Predicting Clinical Dementia Rating Using Blood RNA Levels

The Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) is commonly used to assess cognitive decline in Alzheimer’s disease patients and is included in the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) dataset. We divided 741 ADNI participants with blood microarray data into three groups based on their most recent...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Justin B. Miller, John S. K. Kauwe
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-06-01
Series:Genes
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4425/11/6/706
id doaj-670e0ecf28ae4779b449e394820288d8
record_format Article
spelling doaj-670e0ecf28ae4779b449e394820288d82020-11-25T03:05:31ZengMDPI AGGenes2073-44252020-06-011170670610.3390/genes11060706Predicting Clinical Dementia Rating Using Blood RNA LevelsJustin B. Miller0John S. K. Kauwe1Department of Biology, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT 84602, USADepartment of Biology, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT 84602, USAThe Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) is commonly used to assess cognitive decline in Alzheimer’s disease patients and is included in the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) dataset. We divided 741 ADNI participants with blood microarray data into three groups based on their most recent CDR assessment: cognitive normal (CDR = 0), mild cognitive impairment (CDR = 0.5), and probable Alzheimer’s disease (CDR ≥ 1.0). We then used machine learning to predict cognitive status using only blood RNA levels. Only one probe for chloride intracellular channel 1 (<i>CLIC1</i>) was significant after correction. However, by combining individually nonsignificant probes with <i>p</i>-values less than 0.1, we averaged 87.87% (s = 1.02) predictive accuracy for classifying the three groups, compared to a 55.46% baseline for this study due to unequal group sizes. The best model had an overall precision of 0.902, recall of 0.895, and a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve area of 0.904. Although we identified one significant probe in <i>CLIC1</i>, <i>CLIC1</i> levels alone were not sufficient to predict dementia status and cannot be used alone in a clinical setting. Additional analyses combining individually suggestive, but nonsignificant, blood RNA levels were significantly predictive and may improve diagnostic accuracy for Alzheimer’s disease. Therefore, we propose that patient features that do not individually predict cognitive status might still contribute to overall cognitive decline through interactions that can be elucidated through machine learning.https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4425/11/6/706diagnosismachine learningchloride intracellular channel 1 (<i>CLIC1</i>)clinical dementia ratingAlzheimer’s disease
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Justin B. Miller
John S. K. Kauwe
spellingShingle Justin B. Miller
John S. K. Kauwe
Predicting Clinical Dementia Rating Using Blood RNA Levels
Genes
diagnosis
machine learning
chloride intracellular channel 1 (<i>CLIC1</i>)
clinical dementia rating
Alzheimer’s disease
author_facet Justin B. Miller
John S. K. Kauwe
author_sort Justin B. Miller
title Predicting Clinical Dementia Rating Using Blood RNA Levels
title_short Predicting Clinical Dementia Rating Using Blood RNA Levels
title_full Predicting Clinical Dementia Rating Using Blood RNA Levels
title_fullStr Predicting Clinical Dementia Rating Using Blood RNA Levels
title_full_unstemmed Predicting Clinical Dementia Rating Using Blood RNA Levels
title_sort predicting clinical dementia rating using blood rna levels
publisher MDPI AG
series Genes
issn 2073-4425
publishDate 2020-06-01
description The Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) is commonly used to assess cognitive decline in Alzheimer’s disease patients and is included in the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) dataset. We divided 741 ADNI participants with blood microarray data into three groups based on their most recent CDR assessment: cognitive normal (CDR = 0), mild cognitive impairment (CDR = 0.5), and probable Alzheimer’s disease (CDR ≥ 1.0). We then used machine learning to predict cognitive status using only blood RNA levels. Only one probe for chloride intracellular channel 1 (<i>CLIC1</i>) was significant after correction. However, by combining individually nonsignificant probes with <i>p</i>-values less than 0.1, we averaged 87.87% (s = 1.02) predictive accuracy for classifying the three groups, compared to a 55.46% baseline for this study due to unequal group sizes. The best model had an overall precision of 0.902, recall of 0.895, and a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve area of 0.904. Although we identified one significant probe in <i>CLIC1</i>, <i>CLIC1</i> levels alone were not sufficient to predict dementia status and cannot be used alone in a clinical setting. Additional analyses combining individually suggestive, but nonsignificant, blood RNA levels were significantly predictive and may improve diagnostic accuracy for Alzheimer’s disease. Therefore, we propose that patient features that do not individually predict cognitive status might still contribute to overall cognitive decline through interactions that can be elucidated through machine learning.
topic diagnosis
machine learning
chloride intracellular channel 1 (<i>CLIC1</i>)
clinical dementia rating
Alzheimer’s disease
url https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4425/11/6/706
work_keys_str_mv AT justinbmiller predictingclinicaldementiaratingusingbloodrnalevels
AT johnskkauwe predictingclinicaldementiaratingusingbloodrnalevels
_version_ 1724678128727490560