Korean Experimentation of Knowledge and Technology Transfer to Address Climate Change in Developing Countries
This paper explores two Korean cases of Knowledge and Technology Transfer (KTT) to address climate change in developing countries. The target technologies were carbon capture and utilization (CCU) in a project in Bantayan Island, Philippines, and waste-to-energy (WTE) technology in Santiago, Dominic...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2018-04-01
|
Series: | Sustainability |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/4/1263 |
id |
doaj-6701c8d5465049f0b7fc8ace49f49d7b |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-6701c8d5465049f0b7fc8ace49f49d7b2020-11-25T00:34:44ZengMDPI AGSustainability2071-10502018-04-01104126310.3390/su10041263su10041263Korean Experimentation of Knowledge and Technology Transfer to Address Climate Change in Developing CountriesTaewook Huh0Hyung-Ju Kim1Moon Soul Graduate School of Future Strategy, KAIST (Korea Advanced Institute of Science & Technology), Daejeon 34141, KoreaPolicy Research Division, Green Technology Center, Seoul 04554, KoreaThis paper explores two Korean cases of Knowledge and Technology Transfer (KTT) to address climate change in developing countries. The target technologies were carbon capture and utilization (CCU) in a project in Bantayan Island, Philippines, and waste-to-energy (WTE) technology in Santiago, Dominican Republic. These projects were conducted by the Republic of Korea’s Green Technology Center. The study analyses the rationale of KTT (“international environment” and “motives”), its objects (technology types) and activities (“informational contacts”, “research activities”, “consulting” and “education and training”). It concludes that the KTT efforts of these two case studies can be characterized as “uninformed transfer”, given a lack of information on situational factors. In particular, these projects faced cooperation problems between national and local governments in the target countries due to different levels of commitment among different stakeholder groups. In conclusion, this study identifies the implications of an acceptability gap between national and local actors in renewable energy projects of KTT.http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/4/1263Knowledge and Technology Transfercarbon captured and utilizationwaste-to-energyuninformed transfernational acceptabilitylocal acceptability |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Taewook Huh Hyung-Ju Kim |
spellingShingle |
Taewook Huh Hyung-Ju Kim Korean Experimentation of Knowledge and Technology Transfer to Address Climate Change in Developing Countries Sustainability Knowledge and Technology Transfer carbon captured and utilization waste-to-energy uninformed transfer national acceptability local acceptability |
author_facet |
Taewook Huh Hyung-Ju Kim |
author_sort |
Taewook Huh |
title |
Korean Experimentation of Knowledge and Technology Transfer to Address Climate Change in Developing Countries |
title_short |
Korean Experimentation of Knowledge and Technology Transfer to Address Climate Change in Developing Countries |
title_full |
Korean Experimentation of Knowledge and Technology Transfer to Address Climate Change in Developing Countries |
title_fullStr |
Korean Experimentation of Knowledge and Technology Transfer to Address Climate Change in Developing Countries |
title_full_unstemmed |
Korean Experimentation of Knowledge and Technology Transfer to Address Climate Change in Developing Countries |
title_sort |
korean experimentation of knowledge and technology transfer to address climate change in developing countries |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
series |
Sustainability |
issn |
2071-1050 |
publishDate |
2018-04-01 |
description |
This paper explores two Korean cases of Knowledge and Technology Transfer (KTT) to address climate change in developing countries. The target technologies were carbon capture and utilization (CCU) in a project in Bantayan Island, Philippines, and waste-to-energy (WTE) technology in Santiago, Dominican Republic. These projects were conducted by the Republic of Korea’s Green Technology Center. The study analyses the rationale of KTT (“international environment” and “motives”), its objects (technology types) and activities (“informational contacts”, “research activities”, “consulting” and “education and training”). It concludes that the KTT efforts of these two case studies can be characterized as “uninformed transfer”, given a lack of information on situational factors. In particular, these projects faced cooperation problems between national and local governments in the target countries due to different levels of commitment among different stakeholder groups. In conclusion, this study identifies the implications of an acceptability gap between national and local actors in renewable energy projects of KTT. |
topic |
Knowledge and Technology Transfer carbon captured and utilization waste-to-energy uninformed transfer national acceptability local acceptability |
url |
http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/4/1263 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT taewookhuh koreanexperimentationofknowledgeandtechnologytransfertoaddressclimatechangeindevelopingcountries AT hyungjukim koreanexperimentationofknowledgeandtechnologytransfertoaddressclimatechangeindevelopingcountries |
_version_ |
1725311879405895680 |