Korean Experimentation of Knowledge and Technology Transfer to Address Climate Change in Developing Countries

This paper explores two Korean cases of Knowledge and Technology Transfer (KTT) to address climate change in developing countries. The target technologies were carbon capture and utilization (CCU) in a project in Bantayan Island, Philippines, and waste-to-energy (WTE) technology in Santiago, Dominic...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Taewook Huh, Hyung-Ju Kim
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2018-04-01
Series:Sustainability
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/4/1263
id doaj-6701c8d5465049f0b7fc8ace49f49d7b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-6701c8d5465049f0b7fc8ace49f49d7b2020-11-25T00:34:44ZengMDPI AGSustainability2071-10502018-04-01104126310.3390/su10041263su10041263Korean Experimentation of Knowledge and Technology Transfer to Address Climate Change in Developing CountriesTaewook Huh0Hyung-Ju Kim1Moon Soul Graduate School of Future Strategy, KAIST (Korea Advanced Institute of Science & Technology), Daejeon 34141, KoreaPolicy Research Division, Green Technology Center, Seoul 04554, KoreaThis paper explores two Korean cases of Knowledge and Technology Transfer (KTT) to address climate change in developing countries. The target technologies were carbon capture and utilization (CCU) in a project in Bantayan Island, Philippines, and waste-to-energy (WTE) technology in Santiago, Dominican Republic. These projects were conducted by the Republic of Korea’s Green Technology Center. The study analyses the rationale of KTT (“international environment” and “motives”), its objects (technology types) and activities (“informational contacts”, “research activities”, “consulting” and “education and training”). It concludes that the KTT efforts of these two case studies can be characterized as “uninformed transfer”, given a lack of information on situational factors. In particular, these projects faced cooperation problems between national and local governments in the target countries due to different levels of commitment among different stakeholder groups. In conclusion, this study identifies the implications of an acceptability gap between national and local actors in renewable energy projects of KTT.http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/4/1263Knowledge and Technology Transfercarbon captured and utilizationwaste-to-energyuninformed transfernational acceptabilitylocal acceptability
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Taewook Huh
Hyung-Ju Kim
spellingShingle Taewook Huh
Hyung-Ju Kim
Korean Experimentation of Knowledge and Technology Transfer to Address Climate Change in Developing Countries
Sustainability
Knowledge and Technology Transfer
carbon captured and utilization
waste-to-energy
uninformed transfer
national acceptability
local acceptability
author_facet Taewook Huh
Hyung-Ju Kim
author_sort Taewook Huh
title Korean Experimentation of Knowledge and Technology Transfer to Address Climate Change in Developing Countries
title_short Korean Experimentation of Knowledge and Technology Transfer to Address Climate Change in Developing Countries
title_full Korean Experimentation of Knowledge and Technology Transfer to Address Climate Change in Developing Countries
title_fullStr Korean Experimentation of Knowledge and Technology Transfer to Address Climate Change in Developing Countries
title_full_unstemmed Korean Experimentation of Knowledge and Technology Transfer to Address Climate Change in Developing Countries
title_sort korean experimentation of knowledge and technology transfer to address climate change in developing countries
publisher MDPI AG
series Sustainability
issn 2071-1050
publishDate 2018-04-01
description This paper explores two Korean cases of Knowledge and Technology Transfer (KTT) to address climate change in developing countries. The target technologies were carbon capture and utilization (CCU) in a project in Bantayan Island, Philippines, and waste-to-energy (WTE) technology in Santiago, Dominican Republic. These projects were conducted by the Republic of Korea’s Green Technology Center. The study analyses the rationale of KTT (“international environment” and “motives”), its objects (technology types) and activities (“informational contacts”, “research activities”, “consulting” and “education and training”). It concludes that the KTT efforts of these two case studies can be characterized as “uninformed transfer”, given a lack of information on situational factors. In particular, these projects faced cooperation problems between national and local governments in the target countries due to different levels of commitment among different stakeholder groups. In conclusion, this study identifies the implications of an acceptability gap between national and local actors in renewable energy projects of KTT.
topic Knowledge and Technology Transfer
carbon captured and utilization
waste-to-energy
uninformed transfer
national acceptability
local acceptability
url http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/4/1263
work_keys_str_mv AT taewookhuh koreanexperimentationofknowledgeandtechnologytransfertoaddressclimatechangeindevelopingcountries
AT hyungjukim koreanexperimentationofknowledgeandtechnologytransfertoaddressclimatechangeindevelopingcountries
_version_ 1725311879405895680