CFD Modelling of a Stepped Spillway with Various Step Layouts

A traditional stepped spillway is prone to cavitation risks. To improve its hydraulic behaviors, distorted step faces and pool weirs are devised. By numerical modelling, comparative studies are conducted to look into the flow features. The pressures on step surfaces of the unconventional layouts exh...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Shicheng Li, Qiulin Li, James Yang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Limited 2019-01-01
Series:Mathematical Problems in Engineering
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/6215739
id doaj-66fda268521d4545a4d2a9e60862a091
record_format Article
spelling doaj-66fda268521d4545a4d2a9e60862a0912020-11-25T02:32:11ZengHindawi LimitedMathematical Problems in Engineering1024-123X1563-51472019-01-01201910.1155/2019/62157396215739CFD Modelling of a Stepped Spillway with Various Step LayoutsShicheng Li0Qiulin Li1James Yang2Department of Civil and Architectural Engineering, Royal Institute of Technology (KTH), Stockholm 10044, SwedenSouthwest Science Research Institute of Water Transport Engineering, Chongqing Jiaotong University, Chongqing 400016, ChinaDepartment of Civil and Architectural Engineering, Royal Institute of Technology (KTH), Stockholm 10044, SwedenA traditional stepped spillway is prone to cavitation risks. To improve its hydraulic behaviors, distorted step faces and pool weirs are devised. By numerical modelling, comparative studies are conducted to look into the flow features. The pressures on step surfaces of the unconventional layouts exhibit 3D distributions. Pool weirs are essential in increasing both the min. and max. pressure loads. Pressures on the downstream bed show a unique pattern for V- and inverted V-shaped models, with the extreme pressures at the sidewalls for the former and at the central plane for the latter. Symmetrical secondary flows are formed in V- and inverted V-shaped cases with different patterns. Distributions of turbulent kinetic energy suggest differences in flow motions in all cases. Furthermore, the relative energy loss of flat setups is ∼5.4% lower than that of the pooled ones with the same step face angle; inverting the face angle does not give rise to noticeable change. The results provide reference for relevant projects.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/6215739
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Shicheng Li
Qiulin Li
James Yang
spellingShingle Shicheng Li
Qiulin Li
James Yang
CFD Modelling of a Stepped Spillway with Various Step Layouts
Mathematical Problems in Engineering
author_facet Shicheng Li
Qiulin Li
James Yang
author_sort Shicheng Li
title CFD Modelling of a Stepped Spillway with Various Step Layouts
title_short CFD Modelling of a Stepped Spillway with Various Step Layouts
title_full CFD Modelling of a Stepped Spillway with Various Step Layouts
title_fullStr CFD Modelling of a Stepped Spillway with Various Step Layouts
title_full_unstemmed CFD Modelling of a Stepped Spillway with Various Step Layouts
title_sort cfd modelling of a stepped spillway with various step layouts
publisher Hindawi Limited
series Mathematical Problems in Engineering
issn 1024-123X
1563-5147
publishDate 2019-01-01
description A traditional stepped spillway is prone to cavitation risks. To improve its hydraulic behaviors, distorted step faces and pool weirs are devised. By numerical modelling, comparative studies are conducted to look into the flow features. The pressures on step surfaces of the unconventional layouts exhibit 3D distributions. Pool weirs are essential in increasing both the min. and max. pressure loads. Pressures on the downstream bed show a unique pattern for V- and inverted V-shaped models, with the extreme pressures at the sidewalls for the former and at the central plane for the latter. Symmetrical secondary flows are formed in V- and inverted V-shaped cases with different patterns. Distributions of turbulent kinetic energy suggest differences in flow motions in all cases. Furthermore, the relative energy loss of flat setups is ∼5.4% lower than that of the pooled ones with the same step face angle; inverting the face angle does not give rise to noticeable change. The results provide reference for relevant projects.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/6215739
work_keys_str_mv AT shichengli cfdmodellingofasteppedspillwaywithvarioussteplayouts
AT qiulinli cfdmodellingofasteppedspillwaywithvarioussteplayouts
AT jamesyang cfdmodellingofasteppedspillwaywithvarioussteplayouts
_version_ 1724820842398875648