Making the Case for a Null Effects Framework in Environmental Education and K-12 Academic Outcomes: When “Just as Good” Is a Great Thing
As K-12 audiences represent a major proportion of environmental education (EE) audiences, academics should be an outcome of interest in EE research and evaluation. However, research around links between EE and academic outcomes (e.g., grades, test scores) is scant. Reasons for limited research on EE...
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2019-01-01
|
Series: | Frontiers in Communication |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fcomm.2018.00059/full |
id |
doaj-66f94a3ca79b4205a7bbab4fb74d65ff |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-66f94a3ca79b4205a7bbab4fb74d65ff2020-11-25T02:19:05ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Communication2297-900X2019-01-01310.3389/fcomm.2018.00059432148Making the Case for a Null Effects Framework in Environmental Education and K-12 Academic Outcomes: When “Just as Good” Is a Great ThingKathryn T. Stevenson0M. Nils Peterson1Sarah J. Carrier2Renee L. Strnad3Ryan A. Olson4Rachel E. Szczytko5Department of Parks, Recreation and Tourism Management, NC State University, Raleigh, NC, United StatesFisheries, Wildlife and Conservation Biology Program, Department of Forestry and Environmental Resources, NC State University, Raleigh, NC, United StatesDepartment of Teacher Education and Learning Sciences, NC State University, Raleigh, NC, United StatesDepartment of Forestry and Environmental Resources, NC State University, Raleigh, NC, United StatesMuddy Sneakers, Brevard, NC, United StatesAsombro Institute for Science Education, Las Cruces, NM, United StatesAs K-12 audiences represent a major proportion of environmental education (EE) audiences, academics should be an outcome of interest in EE research and evaluation. However, research around links between EE and academic outcomes (e.g., grades, test scores) is scant. Reasons for limited research on EE and academic outcomes may include disinterest in academic outcomes, assertion that academic outcomes are poor measures of learning, and normative biases against publishing null or negative effects within academia. We argue for adoption of a null effects framework for linking EE and academic outcomes. We begin by outlining what we mean by a null effects framework and then suggest reasons why the EE community should adopt it. Specifically, a null effects framework embraces and celebrates research demonstrating no difference in traditional academic outcomes associated with EE curricula and more traditional classroom instruction. We describe key aspects of operationalizing a null effects framework, including use of key statistical procedures (e.g., measuring power), and changes in peer review associated with emphasizing measures of evidence beyond hypotheses testing and p-values. We conclude by describing how this approach matches EE objectives, strengthens links to academic outcomes without being bound by them, avoids setting unrealistic expectations for EE, and highlights the myriad of non-academic co-benefits offered by EE. As including EE in schools is the best opportunity for reaching the most learners in terms of numbers and diversity, we offer a null effects framework as an approach that can boost adoption of EE where it is arguably needed most.https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fcomm.2018.00059/fullacademic outcomestest scoresenvironmental educationnature-based learningnull effects |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Kathryn T. Stevenson M. Nils Peterson Sarah J. Carrier Renee L. Strnad Ryan A. Olson Rachel E. Szczytko |
spellingShingle |
Kathryn T. Stevenson M. Nils Peterson Sarah J. Carrier Renee L. Strnad Ryan A. Olson Rachel E. Szczytko Making the Case for a Null Effects Framework in Environmental Education and K-12 Academic Outcomes: When “Just as Good” Is a Great Thing Frontiers in Communication academic outcomes test scores environmental education nature-based learning null effects |
author_facet |
Kathryn T. Stevenson M. Nils Peterson Sarah J. Carrier Renee L. Strnad Ryan A. Olson Rachel E. Szczytko |
author_sort |
Kathryn T. Stevenson |
title |
Making the Case for a Null Effects Framework in Environmental Education and K-12 Academic Outcomes: When “Just as Good” Is a Great Thing |
title_short |
Making the Case for a Null Effects Framework in Environmental Education and K-12 Academic Outcomes: When “Just as Good” Is a Great Thing |
title_full |
Making the Case for a Null Effects Framework in Environmental Education and K-12 Academic Outcomes: When “Just as Good” Is a Great Thing |
title_fullStr |
Making the Case for a Null Effects Framework in Environmental Education and K-12 Academic Outcomes: When “Just as Good” Is a Great Thing |
title_full_unstemmed |
Making the Case for a Null Effects Framework in Environmental Education and K-12 Academic Outcomes: When “Just as Good” Is a Great Thing |
title_sort |
making the case for a null effects framework in environmental education and k-12 academic outcomes: when “just as good” is a great thing |
publisher |
Frontiers Media S.A. |
series |
Frontiers in Communication |
issn |
2297-900X |
publishDate |
2019-01-01 |
description |
As K-12 audiences represent a major proportion of environmental education (EE) audiences, academics should be an outcome of interest in EE research and evaluation. However, research around links between EE and academic outcomes (e.g., grades, test scores) is scant. Reasons for limited research on EE and academic outcomes may include disinterest in academic outcomes, assertion that academic outcomes are poor measures of learning, and normative biases against publishing null or negative effects within academia. We argue for adoption of a null effects framework for linking EE and academic outcomes. We begin by outlining what we mean by a null effects framework and then suggest reasons why the EE community should adopt it. Specifically, a null effects framework embraces and celebrates research demonstrating no difference in traditional academic outcomes associated with EE curricula and more traditional classroom instruction. We describe key aspects of operationalizing a null effects framework, including use of key statistical procedures (e.g., measuring power), and changes in peer review associated with emphasizing measures of evidence beyond hypotheses testing and p-values. We conclude by describing how this approach matches EE objectives, strengthens links to academic outcomes without being bound by them, avoids setting unrealistic expectations for EE, and highlights the myriad of non-academic co-benefits offered by EE. As including EE in schools is the best opportunity for reaching the most learners in terms of numbers and diversity, we offer a null effects framework as an approach that can boost adoption of EE where it is arguably needed most. |
topic |
academic outcomes test scores environmental education nature-based learning null effects |
url |
https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fcomm.2018.00059/full |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT kathryntstevenson makingthecaseforanulleffectsframeworkinenvironmentaleducationandk12academicoutcomeswhenjustasgoodisagreatthing AT mnilspeterson makingthecaseforanulleffectsframeworkinenvironmentaleducationandk12academicoutcomeswhenjustasgoodisagreatthing AT sarahjcarrier makingthecaseforanulleffectsframeworkinenvironmentaleducationandk12academicoutcomeswhenjustasgoodisagreatthing AT reneelstrnad makingthecaseforanulleffectsframeworkinenvironmentaleducationandk12academicoutcomeswhenjustasgoodisagreatthing AT ryanaolson makingthecaseforanulleffectsframeworkinenvironmentaleducationandk12academicoutcomeswhenjustasgoodisagreatthing AT racheleszczytko makingthecaseforanulleffectsframeworkinenvironmentaleducationandk12academicoutcomeswhenjustasgoodisagreatthing |
_version_ |
1724878760715485184 |