Making the Case for a Null Effects Framework in Environmental Education and K-12 Academic Outcomes: When “Just as Good” Is a Great Thing

As K-12 audiences represent a major proportion of environmental education (EE) audiences, academics should be an outcome of interest in EE research and evaluation. However, research around links between EE and academic outcomes (e.g., grades, test scores) is scant. Reasons for limited research on EE...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kathryn T. Stevenson, M. Nils Peterson, Sarah J. Carrier, Renee L. Strnad, Ryan A. Olson, Rachel E. Szczytko
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-01-01
Series:Frontiers in Communication
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fcomm.2018.00059/full
id doaj-66f94a3ca79b4205a7bbab4fb74d65ff
record_format Article
spelling doaj-66f94a3ca79b4205a7bbab4fb74d65ff2020-11-25T02:19:05ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Communication2297-900X2019-01-01310.3389/fcomm.2018.00059432148Making the Case for a Null Effects Framework in Environmental Education and K-12 Academic Outcomes: When “Just as Good” Is a Great ThingKathryn T. Stevenson0M. Nils Peterson1Sarah J. Carrier2Renee L. Strnad3Ryan A. Olson4Rachel E. Szczytko5Department of Parks, Recreation and Tourism Management, NC State University, Raleigh, NC, United StatesFisheries, Wildlife and Conservation Biology Program, Department of Forestry and Environmental Resources, NC State University, Raleigh, NC, United StatesDepartment of Teacher Education and Learning Sciences, NC State University, Raleigh, NC, United StatesDepartment of Forestry and Environmental Resources, NC State University, Raleigh, NC, United StatesMuddy Sneakers, Brevard, NC, United StatesAsombro Institute for Science Education, Las Cruces, NM, United StatesAs K-12 audiences represent a major proportion of environmental education (EE) audiences, academics should be an outcome of interest in EE research and evaluation. However, research around links between EE and academic outcomes (e.g., grades, test scores) is scant. Reasons for limited research on EE and academic outcomes may include disinterest in academic outcomes, assertion that academic outcomes are poor measures of learning, and normative biases against publishing null or negative effects within academia. We argue for adoption of a null effects framework for linking EE and academic outcomes. We begin by outlining what we mean by a null effects framework and then suggest reasons why the EE community should adopt it. Specifically, a null effects framework embraces and celebrates research demonstrating no difference in traditional academic outcomes associated with EE curricula and more traditional classroom instruction. We describe key aspects of operationalizing a null effects framework, including use of key statistical procedures (e.g., measuring power), and changes in peer review associated with emphasizing measures of evidence beyond hypotheses testing and p-values. We conclude by describing how this approach matches EE objectives, strengthens links to academic outcomes without being bound by them, avoids setting unrealistic expectations for EE, and highlights the myriad of non-academic co-benefits offered by EE. As including EE in schools is the best opportunity for reaching the most learners in terms of numbers and diversity, we offer a null effects framework as an approach that can boost adoption of EE where it is arguably needed most.https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fcomm.2018.00059/fullacademic outcomestest scoresenvironmental educationnature-based learningnull effects
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Kathryn T. Stevenson
M. Nils Peterson
Sarah J. Carrier
Renee L. Strnad
Ryan A. Olson
Rachel E. Szczytko
spellingShingle Kathryn T. Stevenson
M. Nils Peterson
Sarah J. Carrier
Renee L. Strnad
Ryan A. Olson
Rachel E. Szczytko
Making the Case for a Null Effects Framework in Environmental Education and K-12 Academic Outcomes: When “Just as Good” Is a Great Thing
Frontiers in Communication
academic outcomes
test scores
environmental education
nature-based learning
null effects
author_facet Kathryn T. Stevenson
M. Nils Peterson
Sarah J. Carrier
Renee L. Strnad
Ryan A. Olson
Rachel E. Szczytko
author_sort Kathryn T. Stevenson
title Making the Case for a Null Effects Framework in Environmental Education and K-12 Academic Outcomes: When “Just as Good” Is a Great Thing
title_short Making the Case for a Null Effects Framework in Environmental Education and K-12 Academic Outcomes: When “Just as Good” Is a Great Thing
title_full Making the Case for a Null Effects Framework in Environmental Education and K-12 Academic Outcomes: When “Just as Good” Is a Great Thing
title_fullStr Making the Case for a Null Effects Framework in Environmental Education and K-12 Academic Outcomes: When “Just as Good” Is a Great Thing
title_full_unstemmed Making the Case for a Null Effects Framework in Environmental Education and K-12 Academic Outcomes: When “Just as Good” Is a Great Thing
title_sort making the case for a null effects framework in environmental education and k-12 academic outcomes: when “just as good” is a great thing
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Communication
issn 2297-900X
publishDate 2019-01-01
description As K-12 audiences represent a major proportion of environmental education (EE) audiences, academics should be an outcome of interest in EE research and evaluation. However, research around links between EE and academic outcomes (e.g., grades, test scores) is scant. Reasons for limited research on EE and academic outcomes may include disinterest in academic outcomes, assertion that academic outcomes are poor measures of learning, and normative biases against publishing null or negative effects within academia. We argue for adoption of a null effects framework for linking EE and academic outcomes. We begin by outlining what we mean by a null effects framework and then suggest reasons why the EE community should adopt it. Specifically, a null effects framework embraces and celebrates research demonstrating no difference in traditional academic outcomes associated with EE curricula and more traditional classroom instruction. We describe key aspects of operationalizing a null effects framework, including use of key statistical procedures (e.g., measuring power), and changes in peer review associated with emphasizing measures of evidence beyond hypotheses testing and p-values. We conclude by describing how this approach matches EE objectives, strengthens links to academic outcomes without being bound by them, avoids setting unrealistic expectations for EE, and highlights the myriad of non-academic co-benefits offered by EE. As including EE in schools is the best opportunity for reaching the most learners in terms of numbers and diversity, we offer a null effects framework as an approach that can boost adoption of EE where it is arguably needed most.
topic academic outcomes
test scores
environmental education
nature-based learning
null effects
url https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fcomm.2018.00059/full
work_keys_str_mv AT kathryntstevenson makingthecaseforanulleffectsframeworkinenvironmentaleducationandk12academicoutcomeswhenjustasgoodisagreatthing
AT mnilspeterson makingthecaseforanulleffectsframeworkinenvironmentaleducationandk12academicoutcomeswhenjustasgoodisagreatthing
AT sarahjcarrier makingthecaseforanulleffectsframeworkinenvironmentaleducationandk12academicoutcomeswhenjustasgoodisagreatthing
AT reneelstrnad makingthecaseforanulleffectsframeworkinenvironmentaleducationandk12academicoutcomeswhenjustasgoodisagreatthing
AT ryanaolson makingthecaseforanulleffectsframeworkinenvironmentaleducationandk12academicoutcomeswhenjustasgoodisagreatthing
AT racheleszczytko makingthecaseforanulleffectsframeworkinenvironmentaleducationandk12academicoutcomeswhenjustasgoodisagreatthing
_version_ 1724878760715485184