Effect of structural differences of pumice on synthesis of pumice-supported nFe0: removal of Cr (VI) from water

Abstract In this study, pumice from different regions of Turkey (Diyarbakir, Southeast Turkey and Bitlis, East Turkey) has been supplied and used as supporting material for nanoscale zero-valent iron (nFe0). Native Bitlis pumice (NBP)-supported nanoscale zero-valent iron (BP-nFe0) and native Diyarba...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Bilsen Tural, Erdal Ertaş, Mehmet Güzel, Servet Tural
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SpringerOpen 2021-06-01
Series:Applied Water Science
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-021-01458-6
id doaj-66f2d29435564b6f80d1cd7da94d3c79
record_format Article
spelling doaj-66f2d29435564b6f80d1cd7da94d3c792021-07-04T11:15:11ZengSpringerOpenApplied Water Science2190-54872190-54952021-06-0111711110.1007/s13201-021-01458-6Effect of structural differences of pumice on synthesis of pumice-supported nFe0: removal of Cr (VI) from waterBilsen Tural0Erdal Ertaş1Mehmet Güzel2Servet Tural3Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Education, Dicle UniversityDepartment of Chemistry, Faculty of Education, Dicle UniversityDepartment of Chemistry, Faculty of Education, Dicle UniversityDepartment of Chemistry, Faculty of Education, Dicle UniversityAbstract In this study, pumice from different regions of Turkey (Diyarbakir, Southeast Turkey and Bitlis, East Turkey) has been supplied and used as supporting material for nanoscale zero-valent iron (nFe0). Native Bitlis pumice (NBP)-supported nanoscale zero-valent iron (BP-nFe0) and native Diyarbakir pumice (NDP)-supported nanoscale zero-value iron (DP-nFe0) were synthesized under the same conditions. Native pumice (NDP, NBP) and pumice-supported nFe0 (DP-nFe0 and BP-nFe0) adsorbents were morphologically and structurally characterized by SEM, EDX, XRF and BET. When using NBP as support material, the iron content of the BP-nFe0 increased 1.9-fold from 1.99 to 3.83%. However, iron content of NDP (2.08%) increased approximately 29 times after it is used as a support material in synthesis of DP-nFe0 (60%). The removal potential of native pumice (NBP and NDP) and iron-modified pumice (BP-nFe0 and DP-nFe0) samples was investigated to remove Cr(VI) ions. The parameters of solution pH, initial metal concentration, contact time and the amount of adsorbent in the removal of chromium (VI) ions were investigated. Langmuir, Freundlich, Temkin, Dubinin–Radushkevich and Jovanovic isotherm models were used to evaluate the adsorption equilibrium data. The equilibrium adsorption was found so as to be well described by the Langmuir isotherm model for all the adsorbents studied. The maximum adsorption capacity of Cr(VI) ions for NDP, NBP, DP-nFe0 and BP-nFe0 was 10.82, 14.30, 161.29 and 17.39 mg/g, respectively. The rate of Cr(VI) removal was subjected to kinetic analysis using pseudo-first-order, pseudo-second-order, intraparticle diffusion and Elovich models. Kinetic studies suggest that adsorption of NDP, NBP, DP-nFe0 and BP-nFe0 described more favorably by the pseudo-second-order kinetic model. The results showed that NDP is a much better support material for nFe0 when compared to NBP.https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-021-01458-6PumiceHexavalent chromiumNano-zero-valent ironAdsorptionComparison
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Bilsen Tural
Erdal Ertaş
Mehmet Güzel
Servet Tural
spellingShingle Bilsen Tural
Erdal Ertaş
Mehmet Güzel
Servet Tural
Effect of structural differences of pumice on synthesis of pumice-supported nFe0: removal of Cr (VI) from water
Applied Water Science
Pumice
Hexavalent chromium
Nano-zero-valent iron
Adsorption
Comparison
author_facet Bilsen Tural
Erdal Ertaş
Mehmet Güzel
Servet Tural
author_sort Bilsen Tural
title Effect of structural differences of pumice on synthesis of pumice-supported nFe0: removal of Cr (VI) from water
title_short Effect of structural differences of pumice on synthesis of pumice-supported nFe0: removal of Cr (VI) from water
title_full Effect of structural differences of pumice on synthesis of pumice-supported nFe0: removal of Cr (VI) from water
title_fullStr Effect of structural differences of pumice on synthesis of pumice-supported nFe0: removal of Cr (VI) from water
title_full_unstemmed Effect of structural differences of pumice on synthesis of pumice-supported nFe0: removal of Cr (VI) from water
title_sort effect of structural differences of pumice on synthesis of pumice-supported nfe0: removal of cr (vi) from water
publisher SpringerOpen
series Applied Water Science
issn 2190-5487
2190-5495
publishDate 2021-06-01
description Abstract In this study, pumice from different regions of Turkey (Diyarbakir, Southeast Turkey and Bitlis, East Turkey) has been supplied and used as supporting material for nanoscale zero-valent iron (nFe0). Native Bitlis pumice (NBP)-supported nanoscale zero-valent iron (BP-nFe0) and native Diyarbakir pumice (NDP)-supported nanoscale zero-value iron (DP-nFe0) were synthesized under the same conditions. Native pumice (NDP, NBP) and pumice-supported nFe0 (DP-nFe0 and BP-nFe0) adsorbents were morphologically and structurally characterized by SEM, EDX, XRF and BET. When using NBP as support material, the iron content of the BP-nFe0 increased 1.9-fold from 1.99 to 3.83%. However, iron content of NDP (2.08%) increased approximately 29 times after it is used as a support material in synthesis of DP-nFe0 (60%). The removal potential of native pumice (NBP and NDP) and iron-modified pumice (BP-nFe0 and DP-nFe0) samples was investigated to remove Cr(VI) ions. The parameters of solution pH, initial metal concentration, contact time and the amount of adsorbent in the removal of chromium (VI) ions were investigated. Langmuir, Freundlich, Temkin, Dubinin–Radushkevich and Jovanovic isotherm models were used to evaluate the adsorption equilibrium data. The equilibrium adsorption was found so as to be well described by the Langmuir isotherm model for all the adsorbents studied. The maximum adsorption capacity of Cr(VI) ions for NDP, NBP, DP-nFe0 and BP-nFe0 was 10.82, 14.30, 161.29 and 17.39 mg/g, respectively. The rate of Cr(VI) removal was subjected to kinetic analysis using pseudo-first-order, pseudo-second-order, intraparticle diffusion and Elovich models. Kinetic studies suggest that adsorption of NDP, NBP, DP-nFe0 and BP-nFe0 described more favorably by the pseudo-second-order kinetic model. The results showed that NDP is a much better support material for nFe0 when compared to NBP.
topic Pumice
Hexavalent chromium
Nano-zero-valent iron
Adsorption
Comparison
url https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-021-01458-6
work_keys_str_mv AT bilsentural effectofstructuraldifferencesofpumiceonsynthesisofpumicesupportednfe0removalofcrvifromwater
AT erdalertas effectofstructuraldifferencesofpumiceonsynthesisofpumicesupportednfe0removalofcrvifromwater
AT mehmetguzel effectofstructuraldifferencesofpumiceonsynthesisofpumicesupportednfe0removalofcrvifromwater
AT servettural effectofstructuraldifferencesofpumiceonsynthesisofpumicesupportednfe0removalofcrvifromwater
_version_ 1721320523036622848