Relationship Between the Critical Power Test and a 20-min Functional Threshold Power Test in Cycling

To investigate the agreement between critical power (CP) and functional threshold power (FTP), 17 trained cyclists and triathletes (mean ± SD: age 31 ± 9 years, body mass 80 ± 10 kg, maximal aerobic power 350 ± 56 W, peak oxygen consumption 51 ± 10 mL⋅min–1⋅kg–1) performed a maximal incremental ramp...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Bettina Karsten, Luca Petrigna, Andreas Klose, Antonino Bianco, Nathan Townsend, Christoph Triska
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-01-01
Series:Frontiers in Physiology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fphys.2020.613151/full
id doaj-66f10ee2a232405dabee6ca36b195fad
record_format Article
spelling doaj-66f10ee2a232405dabee6ca36b195fad2021-01-22T07:19:20ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Physiology1664-042X2021-01-011110.3389/fphys.2020.613151613151Relationship Between the Critical Power Test and a 20-min Functional Threshold Power Test in CyclingBettina Karsten0Luca Petrigna1Andreas Klose2Antonino Bianco3Nathan Townsend4Christoph Triska5Christoph Triska6European University of Applied Sciences (EUFH), Berlin, GermanySport and Exercise Sciences Research Unit, University of Palermo, Palermo, ItalyInstitut für Sportwissenschaft, Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität Münster, Münster, GermanySport and Exercise Sciences Research Unit, University of Palermo, Palermo, ItalyCollege of Health and Life Sciences, Hamad Bin Khalifa University, Doha, QatarInstitute of Sport Science, Centre for Sport Science and University Sports, University of Vienna, Vienna, AustriaLeistungssport Austria, High Performance Unit, Brunn am Gebirge, AustriaTo investigate the agreement between critical power (CP) and functional threshold power (FTP), 17 trained cyclists and triathletes (mean ± SD: age 31 ± 9 years, body mass 80 ± 10 kg, maximal aerobic power 350 ± 56 W, peak oxygen consumption 51 ± 10 mL⋅min–1⋅kg–1) performed a maximal incremental ramp test, a single-visit CP test and a 20-min time trial (TT) test in randomized order on three different days. CP was determined using a time-trial (TT) protocol of three durations (12, 7, and 3 min) interspersed by 30 min passive rest. FTP was calculated as 95% of 20-min mean power achieved during the TT. Differences between means were examined using magnitude-based inferences and a paired-samples t-test. Effect sizes are reported as Cohen’s d. Agreement between CP and FTP was assessed using the 95% limits of agreement (LoA) method and Pearson correlation coefficient. There was a 91.7% probability that CP (256 ± 50 W) was higher than FTP (249 ± 44 W). Indeed, CP was significantly higher compared to FTP (P = 0.041) which was associated with a trivial effect size (d = 0.04). The mean bias between CP and FTP was 7 ± 13 W and LoA were −19 to 33 W. Even though strong correlations exist between CP and FTP (r = 0.969; P < 0.001), the chance of meaningful differences in terms of performance (1% smallest worthwhile change), were greater than 90%. With relatively large ranges for LoA between variables, these values generally should not be used interchangeably. Caution should consequently be exercised when choosing between FTP and CP for the purposes of performance analysis.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fphys.2020.613151/fullpower-duration relationshipexercise tolerancefatigue thresholdcycling performancefunctional threshold power
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Bettina Karsten
Luca Petrigna
Andreas Klose
Antonino Bianco
Nathan Townsend
Christoph Triska
Christoph Triska
spellingShingle Bettina Karsten
Luca Petrigna
Andreas Klose
Antonino Bianco
Nathan Townsend
Christoph Triska
Christoph Triska
Relationship Between the Critical Power Test and a 20-min Functional Threshold Power Test in Cycling
Frontiers in Physiology
power-duration relationship
exercise tolerance
fatigue threshold
cycling performance
functional threshold power
author_facet Bettina Karsten
Luca Petrigna
Andreas Klose
Antonino Bianco
Nathan Townsend
Christoph Triska
Christoph Triska
author_sort Bettina Karsten
title Relationship Between the Critical Power Test and a 20-min Functional Threshold Power Test in Cycling
title_short Relationship Between the Critical Power Test and a 20-min Functional Threshold Power Test in Cycling
title_full Relationship Between the Critical Power Test and a 20-min Functional Threshold Power Test in Cycling
title_fullStr Relationship Between the Critical Power Test and a 20-min Functional Threshold Power Test in Cycling
title_full_unstemmed Relationship Between the Critical Power Test and a 20-min Functional Threshold Power Test in Cycling
title_sort relationship between the critical power test and a 20-min functional threshold power test in cycling
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Physiology
issn 1664-042X
publishDate 2021-01-01
description To investigate the agreement between critical power (CP) and functional threshold power (FTP), 17 trained cyclists and triathletes (mean ± SD: age 31 ± 9 years, body mass 80 ± 10 kg, maximal aerobic power 350 ± 56 W, peak oxygen consumption 51 ± 10 mL⋅min–1⋅kg–1) performed a maximal incremental ramp test, a single-visit CP test and a 20-min time trial (TT) test in randomized order on three different days. CP was determined using a time-trial (TT) protocol of three durations (12, 7, and 3 min) interspersed by 30 min passive rest. FTP was calculated as 95% of 20-min mean power achieved during the TT. Differences between means were examined using magnitude-based inferences and a paired-samples t-test. Effect sizes are reported as Cohen’s d. Agreement between CP and FTP was assessed using the 95% limits of agreement (LoA) method and Pearson correlation coefficient. There was a 91.7% probability that CP (256 ± 50 W) was higher than FTP (249 ± 44 W). Indeed, CP was significantly higher compared to FTP (P = 0.041) which was associated with a trivial effect size (d = 0.04). The mean bias between CP and FTP was 7 ± 13 W and LoA were −19 to 33 W. Even though strong correlations exist between CP and FTP (r = 0.969; P < 0.001), the chance of meaningful differences in terms of performance (1% smallest worthwhile change), were greater than 90%. With relatively large ranges for LoA between variables, these values generally should not be used interchangeably. Caution should consequently be exercised when choosing between FTP and CP for the purposes of performance analysis.
topic power-duration relationship
exercise tolerance
fatigue threshold
cycling performance
functional threshold power
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fphys.2020.613151/full
work_keys_str_mv AT bettinakarsten relationshipbetweenthecriticalpowertestanda20minfunctionalthresholdpowertestincycling
AT lucapetrigna relationshipbetweenthecriticalpowertestanda20minfunctionalthresholdpowertestincycling
AT andreasklose relationshipbetweenthecriticalpowertestanda20minfunctionalthresholdpowertestincycling
AT antoninobianco relationshipbetweenthecriticalpowertestanda20minfunctionalthresholdpowertestincycling
AT nathantownsend relationshipbetweenthecriticalpowertestanda20minfunctionalthresholdpowertestincycling
AT christophtriska relationshipbetweenthecriticalpowertestanda20minfunctionalthresholdpowertestincycling
AT christophtriska relationshipbetweenthecriticalpowertestanda20minfunctionalthresholdpowertestincycling
_version_ 1724328431217278976