Relationship Between the Critical Power Test and a 20-min Functional Threshold Power Test in Cycling
To investigate the agreement between critical power (CP) and functional threshold power (FTP), 17 trained cyclists and triathletes (mean ± SD: age 31 ± 9 years, body mass 80 ± 10 kg, maximal aerobic power 350 ± 56 W, peak oxygen consumption 51 ± 10 mL⋅min–1⋅kg–1) performed a maximal incremental ramp...
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2021-01-01
|
Series: | Frontiers in Physiology |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fphys.2020.613151/full |
id |
doaj-66f10ee2a232405dabee6ca36b195fad |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-66f10ee2a232405dabee6ca36b195fad2021-01-22T07:19:20ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Physiology1664-042X2021-01-011110.3389/fphys.2020.613151613151Relationship Between the Critical Power Test and a 20-min Functional Threshold Power Test in CyclingBettina Karsten0Luca Petrigna1Andreas Klose2Antonino Bianco3Nathan Townsend4Christoph Triska5Christoph Triska6European University of Applied Sciences (EUFH), Berlin, GermanySport and Exercise Sciences Research Unit, University of Palermo, Palermo, ItalyInstitut für Sportwissenschaft, Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität Münster, Münster, GermanySport and Exercise Sciences Research Unit, University of Palermo, Palermo, ItalyCollege of Health and Life Sciences, Hamad Bin Khalifa University, Doha, QatarInstitute of Sport Science, Centre for Sport Science and University Sports, University of Vienna, Vienna, AustriaLeistungssport Austria, High Performance Unit, Brunn am Gebirge, AustriaTo investigate the agreement between critical power (CP) and functional threshold power (FTP), 17 trained cyclists and triathletes (mean ± SD: age 31 ± 9 years, body mass 80 ± 10 kg, maximal aerobic power 350 ± 56 W, peak oxygen consumption 51 ± 10 mL⋅min–1⋅kg–1) performed a maximal incremental ramp test, a single-visit CP test and a 20-min time trial (TT) test in randomized order on three different days. CP was determined using a time-trial (TT) protocol of three durations (12, 7, and 3 min) interspersed by 30 min passive rest. FTP was calculated as 95% of 20-min mean power achieved during the TT. Differences between means were examined using magnitude-based inferences and a paired-samples t-test. Effect sizes are reported as Cohen’s d. Agreement between CP and FTP was assessed using the 95% limits of agreement (LoA) method and Pearson correlation coefficient. There was a 91.7% probability that CP (256 ± 50 W) was higher than FTP (249 ± 44 W). Indeed, CP was significantly higher compared to FTP (P = 0.041) which was associated with a trivial effect size (d = 0.04). The mean bias between CP and FTP was 7 ± 13 W and LoA were −19 to 33 W. Even though strong correlations exist between CP and FTP (r = 0.969; P < 0.001), the chance of meaningful differences in terms of performance (1% smallest worthwhile change), were greater than 90%. With relatively large ranges for LoA between variables, these values generally should not be used interchangeably. Caution should consequently be exercised when choosing between FTP and CP for the purposes of performance analysis.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fphys.2020.613151/fullpower-duration relationshipexercise tolerancefatigue thresholdcycling performancefunctional threshold power |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Bettina Karsten Luca Petrigna Andreas Klose Antonino Bianco Nathan Townsend Christoph Triska Christoph Triska |
spellingShingle |
Bettina Karsten Luca Petrigna Andreas Klose Antonino Bianco Nathan Townsend Christoph Triska Christoph Triska Relationship Between the Critical Power Test and a 20-min Functional Threshold Power Test in Cycling Frontiers in Physiology power-duration relationship exercise tolerance fatigue threshold cycling performance functional threshold power |
author_facet |
Bettina Karsten Luca Petrigna Andreas Klose Antonino Bianco Nathan Townsend Christoph Triska Christoph Triska |
author_sort |
Bettina Karsten |
title |
Relationship Between the Critical Power Test and a 20-min Functional Threshold Power Test in Cycling |
title_short |
Relationship Between the Critical Power Test and a 20-min Functional Threshold Power Test in Cycling |
title_full |
Relationship Between the Critical Power Test and a 20-min Functional Threshold Power Test in Cycling |
title_fullStr |
Relationship Between the Critical Power Test and a 20-min Functional Threshold Power Test in Cycling |
title_full_unstemmed |
Relationship Between the Critical Power Test and a 20-min Functional Threshold Power Test in Cycling |
title_sort |
relationship between the critical power test and a 20-min functional threshold power test in cycling |
publisher |
Frontiers Media S.A. |
series |
Frontiers in Physiology |
issn |
1664-042X |
publishDate |
2021-01-01 |
description |
To investigate the agreement between critical power (CP) and functional threshold power (FTP), 17 trained cyclists and triathletes (mean ± SD: age 31 ± 9 years, body mass 80 ± 10 kg, maximal aerobic power 350 ± 56 W, peak oxygen consumption 51 ± 10 mL⋅min–1⋅kg–1) performed a maximal incremental ramp test, a single-visit CP test and a 20-min time trial (TT) test in randomized order on three different days. CP was determined using a time-trial (TT) protocol of three durations (12, 7, and 3 min) interspersed by 30 min passive rest. FTP was calculated as 95% of 20-min mean power achieved during the TT. Differences between means were examined using magnitude-based inferences and a paired-samples t-test. Effect sizes are reported as Cohen’s d. Agreement between CP and FTP was assessed using the 95% limits of agreement (LoA) method and Pearson correlation coefficient. There was a 91.7% probability that CP (256 ± 50 W) was higher than FTP (249 ± 44 W). Indeed, CP was significantly higher compared to FTP (P = 0.041) which was associated with a trivial effect size (d = 0.04). The mean bias between CP and FTP was 7 ± 13 W and LoA were −19 to 33 W. Even though strong correlations exist between CP and FTP (r = 0.969; P < 0.001), the chance of meaningful differences in terms of performance (1% smallest worthwhile change), were greater than 90%. With relatively large ranges for LoA between variables, these values generally should not be used interchangeably. Caution should consequently be exercised when choosing between FTP and CP for the purposes of performance analysis. |
topic |
power-duration relationship exercise tolerance fatigue threshold cycling performance functional threshold power |
url |
https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fphys.2020.613151/full |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT bettinakarsten relationshipbetweenthecriticalpowertestanda20minfunctionalthresholdpowertestincycling AT lucapetrigna relationshipbetweenthecriticalpowertestanda20minfunctionalthresholdpowertestincycling AT andreasklose relationshipbetweenthecriticalpowertestanda20minfunctionalthresholdpowertestincycling AT antoninobianco relationshipbetweenthecriticalpowertestanda20minfunctionalthresholdpowertestincycling AT nathantownsend relationshipbetweenthecriticalpowertestanda20minfunctionalthresholdpowertestincycling AT christophtriska relationshipbetweenthecriticalpowertestanda20minfunctionalthresholdpowertestincycling AT christophtriska relationshipbetweenthecriticalpowertestanda20minfunctionalthresholdpowertestincycling |
_version_ |
1724328431217278976 |