Towards a correlation of form, use and meaning of German 'ge'-prefixed predicative participles
We argue for a split semantics of German predicative participle constructions, depending on whether or not the formation of the participle involves prefixation with the dedicated morpheme 'ge'-. Against the background of the analysis of participles of German 'be'-prefixed verbs p...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Open Library of Humanities
2019-08-01
|
Series: | Glossa |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.glossa-journal.org/articles/753 |
id |
doaj-66e6f6ea2f2d47bbbee2df7a58426191 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-66e6f6ea2f2d47bbbee2df7a584261912021-09-02T09:44:12ZengOpen Library of HumanitiesGlossa2397-18352019-08-014110.5334/gjgl.753399Towards a correlation of form, use and meaning of German 'ge'-prefixed predicative participlesTillmann Pross0Antje Roßdeutscher1University of StuttgartUniversity of StuttgartWe argue for a split semantics of German predicative participle constructions, depending on whether or not the formation of the participle involves prefixation with the dedicated morpheme 'ge'-. Against the background of the analysis of participles of German 'be'-prefixed verbs proposed in Pross (2019), and using the licensing of superlative constructions and 'ung'-nominalizations as tests, we show that 'ge'-prefixed participles denote a result relation between a property of an event and an individual. In contrast, 'be'-prefixed participles, like adjectives, denote properties of individuals. We cast the distinction between event properties and individual properties in a compositional semantics of 'ge'-and 'be'-prefixed participles and show how the resulting semantic distinction allows to predict the distinction between target and resultant state participles drawn in Kratzer (2000) without using the questionable 'immer noch' ‘still’ test.https://www.glossa-journal.org/articles/753GermanLexical SemanticsAdjectival PassivePredicative ParticipleStativityTarget StateResultant State |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Tillmann Pross Antje Roßdeutscher |
spellingShingle |
Tillmann Pross Antje Roßdeutscher Towards a correlation of form, use and meaning of German 'ge'-prefixed predicative participles Glossa German Lexical Semantics Adjectival Passive Predicative Participle Stativity Target State Resultant State |
author_facet |
Tillmann Pross Antje Roßdeutscher |
author_sort |
Tillmann Pross |
title |
Towards a correlation of form, use and meaning of German 'ge'-prefixed predicative participles |
title_short |
Towards a correlation of form, use and meaning of German 'ge'-prefixed predicative participles |
title_full |
Towards a correlation of form, use and meaning of German 'ge'-prefixed predicative participles |
title_fullStr |
Towards a correlation of form, use and meaning of German 'ge'-prefixed predicative participles |
title_full_unstemmed |
Towards a correlation of form, use and meaning of German 'ge'-prefixed predicative participles |
title_sort |
towards a correlation of form, use and meaning of german 'ge'-prefixed predicative participles |
publisher |
Open Library of Humanities |
series |
Glossa |
issn |
2397-1835 |
publishDate |
2019-08-01 |
description |
We argue for a split semantics of German predicative participle constructions, depending on whether or not the formation of the participle involves prefixation with the dedicated morpheme 'ge'-. Against the background of the analysis of participles of German 'be'-prefixed verbs proposed in Pross (2019), and using the licensing of superlative constructions and 'ung'-nominalizations as tests, we show that 'ge'-prefixed participles denote a result relation between a property of an event and an individual. In contrast, 'be'-prefixed participles, like adjectives, denote properties of individuals. We cast the distinction between event properties and individual properties in a compositional semantics of 'ge'-and 'be'-prefixed participles and show how the resulting semantic distinction allows to predict the distinction between target and resultant state participles drawn in Kratzer (2000) without using the questionable 'immer noch' ‘still’ test. |
topic |
German Lexical Semantics Adjectival Passive Predicative Participle Stativity Target State Resultant State |
url |
https://www.glossa-journal.org/articles/753 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT tillmannpross towardsacorrelationofformuseandmeaningofgermangeprefixedpredicativeparticiples AT antjeroßdeutscher towardsacorrelationofformuseandmeaningofgermangeprefixedpredicativeparticiples |
_version_ |
1721176891120943104 |