A meta-analysis of the association between angiotensin-converting enzyme insertion/deletion gene polymorphism and steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome in children

• Main Authors: Tian-Biao Zhou, Yuan-Han Qin, Chao Ou, Li-Na Su, Feng-Ying Lei, Wei-Fang Huang, Yan-Jun Zhao, Yu-Sheng Pang
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Published: Hindawi - SAGE Publishing 2012-03-01
• Series: Journal of the Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System
• Online Access: https://doi.org/10.1177/1470320311422579
• ISSN: 1470-3203; 1752-8976

Background and objective : Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) insertion/deletion (I/D) gene polymorphism correlates with circulating and cellular ACE concentration. Association between ACE I/D gene polymorphism and steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome (SSNS) risk in children is still controversial. This meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the relation between ACE I/D gene polymorphism and SSNS susceptibility in children. Methods : The relevant investigations were screened from the search engines of PubMed, Cochrane Library and CBM-disc (China Biological Medicine Database) as of 1 March 2011, and eligible studies were synthesized using meta-analysis methods. Results : Ten studies were identified for the analysis of association between ACE I/D gene polymorphism and SSNS risk in children, including seven in Asians, one for Caucasians and two in Africans. There was no markedly positive association between D allele or DD genotype and SSNS susceptibility in Asians, Caucasians and Africans (D: Asians OR = 1.24, p = 0.28; Caucasians OR = 1.61, p = 0.15; Africans OR = 1.61, p = 0.53; DD: Asians OR = 1.72, p = 0.15; Caucasians OR = 1.39, p = 0.48; Africans OR = 1.80, p = 0.56). Furthermore, II homozygous seemed not to play a protective role against SSNS onset for Asians, Caucasians and Africans (Asians OR = 0.95, p = 0.85; Caucasians OR = 0.30, p = 0.11; Africans OR = 0.60, p = 0.65). Conclusions : There was no association between ACE I/D gene polymorphism and SSNS susceptibility in Asians, Caucasians and Africans. However, the conclusions for Caucasians and Africans were less powerful.