Setting the research agenda for living with and beyond cancer with comorbid illness: reflections on a research prioritisation exercise

Abstract Background People living with and beyond cancer are more likely to have comorbid conditions and poorer mental and physical health, but there is a dearth of in-depth research exploring the psychosocial needs of people experiencing cancer and comorbid chronic conditions. A patient partnership...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: D. Cavers, S. Cunningham-Burley, E. Watson, E. Banks, C. Campbell
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2020-04-01
Series:Research Involvement and Engagement
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40900-020-00191-9
id doaj-66bca5ad994440fda52b91c464fc1180
record_format Article
spelling doaj-66bca5ad994440fda52b91c464fc11802020-11-25T03:02:46ZengBMCResearch Involvement and Engagement2056-75292020-04-01611910.1186/s40900-020-00191-9Setting the research agenda for living with and beyond cancer with comorbid illness: reflections on a research prioritisation exerciseD. Cavers0S. Cunningham-Burley1E. Watson2E. Banks3C. Campbell4Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Medical SchoolUsher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Medical SchoolFaculty of Health and Life Sciences, Oxford Brookes Universityc/o NCRIUsher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Medical SchoolAbstract Background People living with and beyond cancer are more likely to have comorbid conditions and poorer mental and physical health, but there is a dearth of in-depth research exploring the psychosocial needs of people experiencing cancer and comorbid chronic conditions. A patient partnership approach to research prioritisation and planning can ensure outcomes meaningful to those affected and can inform policy and practice accordingly, but can be challenging. Methods We aimed to inform priorities for qualitative inquiry into the experiences and support needs of people living with and beyond cancer with comorbid illness using a partnership approach. A three-step process including a patient workshop to develop a consultation document, online consultation with patients, and academic expert consultation was carried out. The research prioritisation process was also appraised and reflected upon. Results Six people attended the workshop, ten responded online and eight academic experts commented on the consultation document. Five key priorities were identified for exploration in subsequent qualitative studies, including the diagnostic journey, the burden of symptoms, managing medications, addressing the needs of informal carers, and service provision. Limitations of patient involvement and reflections on procedural ethics, and the challenge of making measurable differences to patient outcomes were discussed. Conclusions Findings from this research prioritisation exercise will inform planned qualitative work to explore patients’ experiences of living with and beyond cancer with comorbid illness. Including patient partners in the research prioritisation process adds focus and relevance, and feeds into future work and recommendations to improve health and social care for this group of patients. Reflections on the consultation process contribute to a broadening of understanding the field of patient involvement.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40900-020-00191-9Patient and public involvementResearch prioritisationQualitativeLiving with and beyond cancerComorbid illnessMulti-morbidity
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author D. Cavers
S. Cunningham-Burley
E. Watson
E. Banks
C. Campbell
spellingShingle D. Cavers
S. Cunningham-Burley
E. Watson
E. Banks
C. Campbell
Setting the research agenda for living with and beyond cancer with comorbid illness: reflections on a research prioritisation exercise
Research Involvement and Engagement
Patient and public involvement
Research prioritisation
Qualitative
Living with and beyond cancer
Comorbid illness
Multi-morbidity
author_facet D. Cavers
S. Cunningham-Burley
E. Watson
E. Banks
C. Campbell
author_sort D. Cavers
title Setting the research agenda for living with and beyond cancer with comorbid illness: reflections on a research prioritisation exercise
title_short Setting the research agenda for living with and beyond cancer with comorbid illness: reflections on a research prioritisation exercise
title_full Setting the research agenda for living with and beyond cancer with comorbid illness: reflections on a research prioritisation exercise
title_fullStr Setting the research agenda for living with and beyond cancer with comorbid illness: reflections on a research prioritisation exercise
title_full_unstemmed Setting the research agenda for living with and beyond cancer with comorbid illness: reflections on a research prioritisation exercise
title_sort setting the research agenda for living with and beyond cancer with comorbid illness: reflections on a research prioritisation exercise
publisher BMC
series Research Involvement and Engagement
issn 2056-7529
publishDate 2020-04-01
description Abstract Background People living with and beyond cancer are more likely to have comorbid conditions and poorer mental and physical health, but there is a dearth of in-depth research exploring the psychosocial needs of people experiencing cancer and comorbid chronic conditions. A patient partnership approach to research prioritisation and planning can ensure outcomes meaningful to those affected and can inform policy and practice accordingly, but can be challenging. Methods We aimed to inform priorities for qualitative inquiry into the experiences and support needs of people living with and beyond cancer with comorbid illness using a partnership approach. A three-step process including a patient workshop to develop a consultation document, online consultation with patients, and academic expert consultation was carried out. The research prioritisation process was also appraised and reflected upon. Results Six people attended the workshop, ten responded online and eight academic experts commented on the consultation document. Five key priorities were identified for exploration in subsequent qualitative studies, including the diagnostic journey, the burden of symptoms, managing medications, addressing the needs of informal carers, and service provision. Limitations of patient involvement and reflections on procedural ethics, and the challenge of making measurable differences to patient outcomes were discussed. Conclusions Findings from this research prioritisation exercise will inform planned qualitative work to explore patients’ experiences of living with and beyond cancer with comorbid illness. Including patient partners in the research prioritisation process adds focus and relevance, and feeds into future work and recommendations to improve health and social care for this group of patients. Reflections on the consultation process contribute to a broadening of understanding the field of patient involvement.
topic Patient and public involvement
Research prioritisation
Qualitative
Living with and beyond cancer
Comorbid illness
Multi-morbidity
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40900-020-00191-9
work_keys_str_mv AT dcavers settingtheresearchagendaforlivingwithandbeyondcancerwithcomorbidillnessreflectionsonaresearchprioritisationexercise
AT scunninghamburley settingtheresearchagendaforlivingwithandbeyondcancerwithcomorbidillnessreflectionsonaresearchprioritisationexercise
AT ewatson settingtheresearchagendaforlivingwithandbeyondcancerwithcomorbidillnessreflectionsonaresearchprioritisationexercise
AT ebanks settingtheresearchagendaforlivingwithandbeyondcancerwithcomorbidillnessreflectionsonaresearchprioritisationexercise
AT ccampbell settingtheresearchagendaforlivingwithandbeyondcancerwithcomorbidillnessreflectionsonaresearchprioritisationexercise
_version_ 1724688536351801344