Methodological issues regarding power of classical test theory (CTT) and item response theory (IRT)-based approaches for the comparison of patient-reported outcomes in two groups of patients - a simulation study
<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Patients-Reported Outcomes (PRO) are increasingly used in clinical and epidemiological research. Two main types of analytical strategies can be found for these data: classical test theory (CTT) based on the observed scores and models...
Main Authors: | Boyer François, Kubis Gildas, Le Néel Tanguy, Hardouin Jean-Benoit, Sébille Véronique, Guillemin Francis, Falissard Bruno |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2010-03-01
|
Series: | BMC Medical Research Methodology |
Online Access: | http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2288/10/24 |
Similar Items
-
Introduction and analytical comparison of classic test theory (CTT) and item response theory (IRT) in psychometrics
by: Gholamreza Goolmohammadnejhad
Published: (2009-02-01) -
Power and sample size determination for the group comparison of patient-reported outcomes with Rasch family models.
by: Myriam Blanchin, et al.
Published: (2013-01-01) -
The application of Classical Test Theory (CTT) to the development of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) in health services research
by: Hankins, Matthew
Published: (2009) -
Biases and power for groups comparison on subjective health measurements.
by: Jean-François Hamel, et al.
Published: (2012-01-01) -
The external validity of scores based on the twoparameter logistic model: Some comparisons between IRT and CTT
by: Pere J. Ferrando, et al.
Published: (2007-01-01)