Combining walking accessiblity measures to map spatial inequalities
Evaluating spatial inequalities using a single walking accessibility measure is quite challenging. In response, the paper proposes combining two accessibility measures (real and potential) to provide additional insights into the identification and mapping of spatial inequalities. The municipality of...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Taylor & Francis Group
2021-01-01
|
Series: | Journal of Maps |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17445647.2021.1962752 |
id |
doaj-6698737c9b3e47838b0af9a52c080e8e |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-6698737c9b3e47838b0af9a52c080e8e2021-08-24T14:40:59ZengTaylor & Francis GroupJournal of Maps1744-56472021-01-01171849310.1080/17445647.2021.19627521962752Combining walking accessiblity measures to map spatial inequalitiesAldo Arranz-López0Luis M. Mejía-Macias1Julio A. Soria-Lara2Goethe University Frankfurt/MainTransport Research Centre-TRANSyT-, Universidad Politécnica de MadridTransport Research Centre-TRANSyT-, Universidad Politécnica de MadridEvaluating spatial inequalities using a single walking accessibility measure is quite challenging. In response, the paper proposes combining two accessibility measures (real and potential) to provide additional insights into the identification and mapping of spatial inequalities. The municipality of Getafe in the Madrid Metropolitan Area, Spain serves as a case study. A questionnaire, administered via face-to-face interviews, recorded the resident’s walking preferences for reaching in-store retail. A gravity-based model was used to calculate real and potential accessibilities, which were combined to map four accessibility places that originate spatial inequalities: advantageous, moderately advantageous, moderately disadvantageous, and disadvantageous. The results suggest that potential accessibility values are higher than real accessibility values, and the final map shows the city centre residents (mostly seniors) benefit from the advantageous accessibility places. Disadvantageous places are mainly found in the city’s periphery, where younger people live.http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17445647.2021.1962752social exclusiontravel timepedestrianretailactive mobility |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Aldo Arranz-López Luis M. Mejía-Macias Julio A. Soria-Lara |
spellingShingle |
Aldo Arranz-López Luis M. Mejía-Macias Julio A. Soria-Lara Combining walking accessiblity measures to map spatial inequalities Journal of Maps social exclusion travel time pedestrian retail active mobility |
author_facet |
Aldo Arranz-López Luis M. Mejía-Macias Julio A. Soria-Lara |
author_sort |
Aldo Arranz-López |
title |
Combining walking accessiblity measures to map spatial inequalities |
title_short |
Combining walking accessiblity measures to map spatial inequalities |
title_full |
Combining walking accessiblity measures to map spatial inequalities |
title_fullStr |
Combining walking accessiblity measures to map spatial inequalities |
title_full_unstemmed |
Combining walking accessiblity measures to map spatial inequalities |
title_sort |
combining walking accessiblity measures to map spatial inequalities |
publisher |
Taylor & Francis Group |
series |
Journal of Maps |
issn |
1744-5647 |
publishDate |
2021-01-01 |
description |
Evaluating spatial inequalities using a single walking accessibility measure is quite challenging. In response, the paper proposes combining two accessibility measures (real and potential) to provide additional insights into the identification and mapping of spatial inequalities. The municipality of Getafe in the Madrid Metropolitan Area, Spain serves as a case study. A questionnaire, administered via face-to-face interviews, recorded the resident’s walking preferences for reaching in-store retail. A gravity-based model was used to calculate real and potential accessibilities, which were combined to map four accessibility places that originate spatial inequalities: advantageous, moderately advantageous, moderately disadvantageous, and disadvantageous. The results suggest that potential accessibility values are higher than real accessibility values, and the final map shows the city centre residents (mostly seniors) benefit from the advantageous accessibility places. Disadvantageous places are mainly found in the city’s periphery, where younger people live. |
topic |
social exclusion travel time pedestrian retail active mobility |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17445647.2021.1962752 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT aldoarranzlopez combiningwalkingaccessiblitymeasurestomapspatialinequalities AT luismmejiamacias combiningwalkingaccessiblitymeasurestomapspatialinequalities AT julioasorialara combiningwalkingaccessiblitymeasurestomapspatialinequalities |
_version_ |
1721197365545664512 |