Combining walking accessiblity measures to map spatial inequalities

Evaluating spatial inequalities using a single walking accessibility measure is quite challenging. In response, the paper proposes combining two accessibility measures (real and potential) to provide additional insights into the identification and mapping of spatial inequalities. The municipality of...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Aldo Arranz-López, Luis M. Mejía-Macias, Julio A. Soria-Lara
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Taylor & Francis Group 2021-01-01
Series:Journal of Maps
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17445647.2021.1962752
id doaj-6698737c9b3e47838b0af9a52c080e8e
record_format Article
spelling doaj-6698737c9b3e47838b0af9a52c080e8e2021-08-24T14:40:59ZengTaylor & Francis GroupJournal of Maps1744-56472021-01-01171849310.1080/17445647.2021.19627521962752Combining walking accessiblity measures to map spatial inequalitiesAldo Arranz-López0Luis M. Mejía-Macias1Julio A. Soria-Lara2Goethe University Frankfurt/MainTransport Research Centre-TRANSyT-, Universidad Politécnica de MadridTransport Research Centre-TRANSyT-, Universidad Politécnica de MadridEvaluating spatial inequalities using a single walking accessibility measure is quite challenging. In response, the paper proposes combining two accessibility measures (real and potential) to provide additional insights into the identification and mapping of spatial inequalities. The municipality of Getafe in the Madrid Metropolitan Area, Spain serves as a case study. A questionnaire, administered via face-to-face interviews, recorded the resident’s walking preferences for reaching in-store retail. A gravity-based model was used to calculate real and potential accessibilities, which were combined to map four accessibility places that originate spatial inequalities: advantageous, moderately advantageous, moderately disadvantageous, and disadvantageous. The results suggest that potential accessibility values are higher than real accessibility values, and the final map shows the city centre residents (mostly seniors) benefit from the advantageous accessibility places. Disadvantageous places are mainly found in the city’s periphery, where younger people live.http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17445647.2021.1962752social exclusiontravel timepedestrianretailactive mobility
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Aldo Arranz-López
Luis M. Mejía-Macias
Julio A. Soria-Lara
spellingShingle Aldo Arranz-López
Luis M. Mejía-Macias
Julio A. Soria-Lara
Combining walking accessiblity measures to map spatial inequalities
Journal of Maps
social exclusion
travel time
pedestrian
retail
active mobility
author_facet Aldo Arranz-López
Luis M. Mejía-Macias
Julio A. Soria-Lara
author_sort Aldo Arranz-López
title Combining walking accessiblity measures to map spatial inequalities
title_short Combining walking accessiblity measures to map spatial inequalities
title_full Combining walking accessiblity measures to map spatial inequalities
title_fullStr Combining walking accessiblity measures to map spatial inequalities
title_full_unstemmed Combining walking accessiblity measures to map spatial inequalities
title_sort combining walking accessiblity measures to map spatial inequalities
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
series Journal of Maps
issn 1744-5647
publishDate 2021-01-01
description Evaluating spatial inequalities using a single walking accessibility measure is quite challenging. In response, the paper proposes combining two accessibility measures (real and potential) to provide additional insights into the identification and mapping of spatial inequalities. The municipality of Getafe in the Madrid Metropolitan Area, Spain serves as a case study. A questionnaire, administered via face-to-face interviews, recorded the resident’s walking preferences for reaching in-store retail. A gravity-based model was used to calculate real and potential accessibilities, which were combined to map four accessibility places that originate spatial inequalities: advantageous, moderately advantageous, moderately disadvantageous, and disadvantageous. The results suggest that potential accessibility values are higher than real accessibility values, and the final map shows the city centre residents (mostly seniors) benefit from the advantageous accessibility places. Disadvantageous places are mainly found in the city’s periphery, where younger people live.
topic social exclusion
travel time
pedestrian
retail
active mobility
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17445647.2021.1962752
work_keys_str_mv AT aldoarranzlopez combiningwalkingaccessiblitymeasurestomapspatialinequalities
AT luismmejiamacias combiningwalkingaccessiblitymeasurestomapspatialinequalities
AT julioasorialara combiningwalkingaccessiblitymeasurestomapspatialinequalities
_version_ 1721197365545664512