EUS-guided sampling with 25G biopsy needle as a rescue strategy for diagnosis of small subepithelial lesions of the upper gastrointestinal tract

Background and study aims This study was designed to evaluate the impact of additional tissue obtained with endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided 25-gauge core biopsy needle (25G-PC) following an unsuccessful fine-needle biopsy (FNB) performed with larger-bore needles for the characterization of gastro...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Filippo Antonini, Sara Giorgini, Lorenzo Fuccio, Lucia Angelelli, Giampiero Macarri
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2018-07-01
Series:Endoscopy International Open
Online Access:http://www.thieme-connect.de/DOI/DOI?10.1055/a-0603-3578
id doaj-6694b872918c44429f3fe93e9211c7ae
record_format Article
spelling doaj-6694b872918c44429f3fe93e9211c7ae2020-11-25T03:51:35ZengGeorg Thieme Verlag KGEndoscopy International Open2364-37222196-97362018-07-010607E892E89710.1055/a-0603-3578EUS-guided sampling with 25G biopsy needle as a rescue strategy for diagnosis of small subepithelial lesions of the upper gastrointestinal tractFilippo Antonini0Sara Giorgini1Lorenzo Fuccio2Lucia Angelelli3Giampiero Macarri4Department of Gastroenterology, A. Murri Hospital, Polytechnic University of Marche, Fermo, Italy Pathological Anatomy and Histopathology, Department of Biomedical Sciences and Public Health, Polytechnic University of Marche, Ancona, Italy Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, S. Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, University of Bologna, Bologna, ItalyMedical Oncology, Mazzoni Hospital, Ascoli Piceno, ItalyDepartment of Gastroenterology, A. Murri Hospital, Polytechnic University of Marche, Fermo, Italy Background and study aims This study was designed to evaluate the impact of additional tissue obtained with endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided 25-gauge core biopsy needle (25G-PC) following an unsuccessful fine-needle biopsy (FNB) performed with larger-bore needles for the characterization of gastrointestinal subepithelial lesions (GI-SELs). Patients and methods We prospectively collected and retrospectively analyzed information in our database from January 2013 to June 2017 for all patients with GI-SELs who received a EUS-guided FNB (EUS-FNB) with 25G-PC during the same procedure after failure of biopsy performed with larger-bore needle. Diagnostic yield, diagnostic accuracy and procedural complications were evaluated. Results Sixteen patients were included in this study, 10 men and 6 women, median age 67.8 (range 43 to 76 years). Five patients were found to have a SEL localized in the distal duodenum, five in the gastric antrum, two in the gastric fundus and four in the gastric body. The mean size of the lesions was 20.5 mm (range 18 – 24 mm). EUS-FNB with 25G-PC enabled final diagnosis in nine patients (56.2 %). Regarding the subgroup of duodenal lesions, the procedure was successful in four of five (80 %). Final diagnoses with EUS-guided sampling were GIST (n = 6), leiomyoma (n = 2) and metastatic ovarian carcinoma (n = 1). No procedure-related complications were recorded. Conclusion In patients with small GI-SELs, additional tissue obtained with 25G-PC could represents a “rescue” strategy after an unsuccessful procedure with larger-bore needles, especially when lesions are localized in the distal duodenum.http://www.thieme-connect.de/DOI/DOI?10.1055/a-0603-3578
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Filippo Antonini
Sara Giorgini
Lorenzo Fuccio
Lucia Angelelli
Giampiero Macarri
spellingShingle Filippo Antonini
Sara Giorgini
Lorenzo Fuccio
Lucia Angelelli
Giampiero Macarri
EUS-guided sampling with 25G biopsy needle as a rescue strategy for diagnosis of small subepithelial lesions of the upper gastrointestinal tract
Endoscopy International Open
author_facet Filippo Antonini
Sara Giorgini
Lorenzo Fuccio
Lucia Angelelli
Giampiero Macarri
author_sort Filippo Antonini
title EUS-guided sampling with 25G biopsy needle as a rescue strategy for diagnosis of small subepithelial lesions of the upper gastrointestinal tract
title_short EUS-guided sampling with 25G biopsy needle as a rescue strategy for diagnosis of small subepithelial lesions of the upper gastrointestinal tract
title_full EUS-guided sampling with 25G biopsy needle as a rescue strategy for diagnosis of small subepithelial lesions of the upper gastrointestinal tract
title_fullStr EUS-guided sampling with 25G biopsy needle as a rescue strategy for diagnosis of small subepithelial lesions of the upper gastrointestinal tract
title_full_unstemmed EUS-guided sampling with 25G biopsy needle as a rescue strategy for diagnosis of small subepithelial lesions of the upper gastrointestinal tract
title_sort eus-guided sampling with 25g biopsy needle as a rescue strategy for diagnosis of small subepithelial lesions of the upper gastrointestinal tract
publisher Georg Thieme Verlag KG
series Endoscopy International Open
issn 2364-3722
2196-9736
publishDate 2018-07-01
description Background and study aims This study was designed to evaluate the impact of additional tissue obtained with endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided 25-gauge core biopsy needle (25G-PC) following an unsuccessful fine-needle biopsy (FNB) performed with larger-bore needles for the characterization of gastrointestinal subepithelial lesions (GI-SELs). Patients and methods We prospectively collected and retrospectively analyzed information in our database from January 2013 to June 2017 for all patients with GI-SELs who received a EUS-guided FNB (EUS-FNB) with 25G-PC during the same procedure after failure of biopsy performed with larger-bore needle. Diagnostic yield, diagnostic accuracy and procedural complications were evaluated. Results Sixteen patients were included in this study, 10 men and 6 women, median age 67.8 (range 43 to 76 years). Five patients were found to have a SEL localized in the distal duodenum, five in the gastric antrum, two in the gastric fundus and four in the gastric body. The mean size of the lesions was 20.5 mm (range 18 – 24 mm). EUS-FNB with 25G-PC enabled final diagnosis in nine patients (56.2 %). Regarding the subgroup of duodenal lesions, the procedure was successful in four of five (80 %). Final diagnoses with EUS-guided sampling were GIST (n = 6), leiomyoma (n = 2) and metastatic ovarian carcinoma (n = 1). No procedure-related complications were recorded. Conclusion In patients with small GI-SELs, additional tissue obtained with 25G-PC could represents a “rescue” strategy after an unsuccessful procedure with larger-bore needles, especially when lesions are localized in the distal duodenum.
url http://www.thieme-connect.de/DOI/DOI?10.1055/a-0603-3578
work_keys_str_mv AT filippoantonini eusguidedsamplingwith25gbiopsyneedleasarescuestrategyfordiagnosisofsmallsubepitheliallesionsoftheuppergastrointestinaltract
AT saragiorgini eusguidedsamplingwith25gbiopsyneedleasarescuestrategyfordiagnosisofsmallsubepitheliallesionsoftheuppergastrointestinaltract
AT lorenzofuccio eusguidedsamplingwith25gbiopsyneedleasarescuestrategyfordiagnosisofsmallsubepitheliallesionsoftheuppergastrointestinaltract
AT luciaangelelli eusguidedsamplingwith25gbiopsyneedleasarescuestrategyfordiagnosisofsmallsubepitheliallesionsoftheuppergastrointestinaltract
AT giampieromacarri eusguidedsamplingwith25gbiopsyneedleasarescuestrategyfordiagnosisofsmallsubepitheliallesionsoftheuppergastrointestinaltract
_version_ 1724486703865921536