Employment and quality of life postkidney transplant: Are we justifying the choice of RRT - A cross sectional study

Introduction: For kidney, patients' socioeconomic status (SES) and employment significantly contribute to their general well-being, mental health (MH), and quality of life (QoL). Due to the scarcity of the literature, the present study was conducted to analyze the interrelationship between QoL,...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Shikha Khandelwal, Vinay Malhotra, Dhananjay Agarwal, Pankaj Beniwal, Sanjeev Sharma, Rajesh Jorawat, Vartul Gupta, Shiv Chada
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2020-01-01
Series:Indian Journal of Transplantation
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.ijtonline.in/article.asp?issn=2212-0017;year=2020;volume=14;issue=3;spage=219;epage=223;aulast=Khandelwal
id doaj-66779037f8364eb7a26d03b9505b0d0b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-66779037f8364eb7a26d03b9505b0d0b2020-11-25T03:37:17ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsIndian Journal of Transplantation2212-00172212-00252020-01-0114321922310.4103/ijot.ijot_47_20Employment and quality of life postkidney transplant: Are we justifying the choice of RRT - A cross sectional studyShikha KhandelwalVinay MalhotraDhananjay AgarwalPankaj BeniwalSanjeev SharmaRajesh JorawatVartul GuptaShiv ChadaIntroduction: For kidney, patients' socioeconomic status (SES) and employment significantly contribute to their general well-being, mental health (MH), and quality of life (QoL). Due to the scarcity of the literature, the present study was conducted to analyze the interrelationship between QoL, employment, and sociodemographic factors postkidney transplant and to identify the possible predictors of employment. Materials and Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted on 90 kidney transplant patients during follow-up visits from July 2018 to June 2019 in the tertiary care government institute in North India. Employment before and after transplant was evaluated using a sociodemographic schedule. Short-form health survey 36 was used for the QoL. Results: Lower SES was not found in any of the subject's prekidney transplants, whereas it was revealed in 27.8% of the subject's postkidney transplant with a statistically significant difference. Unemployed status was also increased from 23.3% to 47.8% postkidney transplant. Employment posttransplant (EPT) is not associated with a good perception of psychophysical well-being: EPT/general health, r = −01.6; EPT/MH, r=-0.08, and EPT/ Mental component summary score (MCS), r = −0.34. It emerged that job return depends on the highest education, exercise, and insurance, while it is inversely proportional to the residence in a rural area and lower SES. Conclusion: Maintaining employment pretransplant and posttransplant should be actively supported and in case employment is lost, return to work should be integrated into the transplant planning. It may be useful to organize psychological support for these patients and to cure any psychological fragility in the posttransplant condition.http://www.ijtonline.in/article.asp?issn=2212-0017;year=2020;volume=14;issue=3;spage=219;epage=223;aulast=Khandelwalemploymentquality of liferenal transplantation
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Shikha Khandelwal
Vinay Malhotra
Dhananjay Agarwal
Pankaj Beniwal
Sanjeev Sharma
Rajesh Jorawat
Vartul Gupta
Shiv Chada
spellingShingle Shikha Khandelwal
Vinay Malhotra
Dhananjay Agarwal
Pankaj Beniwal
Sanjeev Sharma
Rajesh Jorawat
Vartul Gupta
Shiv Chada
Employment and quality of life postkidney transplant: Are we justifying the choice of RRT - A cross sectional study
Indian Journal of Transplantation
employment
quality of life
renal transplantation
author_facet Shikha Khandelwal
Vinay Malhotra
Dhananjay Agarwal
Pankaj Beniwal
Sanjeev Sharma
Rajesh Jorawat
Vartul Gupta
Shiv Chada
author_sort Shikha Khandelwal
title Employment and quality of life postkidney transplant: Are we justifying the choice of RRT - A cross sectional study
title_short Employment and quality of life postkidney transplant: Are we justifying the choice of RRT - A cross sectional study
title_full Employment and quality of life postkidney transplant: Are we justifying the choice of RRT - A cross sectional study
title_fullStr Employment and quality of life postkidney transplant: Are we justifying the choice of RRT - A cross sectional study
title_full_unstemmed Employment and quality of life postkidney transplant: Are we justifying the choice of RRT - A cross sectional study
title_sort employment and quality of life postkidney transplant: are we justifying the choice of rrt - a cross sectional study
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
series Indian Journal of Transplantation
issn 2212-0017
2212-0025
publishDate 2020-01-01
description Introduction: For kidney, patients' socioeconomic status (SES) and employment significantly contribute to their general well-being, mental health (MH), and quality of life (QoL). Due to the scarcity of the literature, the present study was conducted to analyze the interrelationship between QoL, employment, and sociodemographic factors postkidney transplant and to identify the possible predictors of employment. Materials and Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted on 90 kidney transplant patients during follow-up visits from July 2018 to June 2019 in the tertiary care government institute in North India. Employment before and after transplant was evaluated using a sociodemographic schedule. Short-form health survey 36 was used for the QoL. Results: Lower SES was not found in any of the subject's prekidney transplants, whereas it was revealed in 27.8% of the subject's postkidney transplant with a statistically significant difference. Unemployed status was also increased from 23.3% to 47.8% postkidney transplant. Employment posttransplant (EPT) is not associated with a good perception of psychophysical well-being: EPT/general health, r = −01.6; EPT/MH, r=-0.08, and EPT/ Mental component summary score (MCS), r = −0.34. It emerged that job return depends on the highest education, exercise, and insurance, while it is inversely proportional to the residence in a rural area and lower SES. Conclusion: Maintaining employment pretransplant and posttransplant should be actively supported and in case employment is lost, return to work should be integrated into the transplant planning. It may be useful to organize psychological support for these patients and to cure any psychological fragility in the posttransplant condition.
topic employment
quality of life
renal transplantation
url http://www.ijtonline.in/article.asp?issn=2212-0017;year=2020;volume=14;issue=3;spage=219;epage=223;aulast=Khandelwal
work_keys_str_mv AT shikhakhandelwal employmentandqualityoflifepostkidneytransplantarewejustifyingthechoiceofrrtacrosssectionalstudy
AT vinaymalhotra employmentandqualityoflifepostkidneytransplantarewejustifyingthechoiceofrrtacrosssectionalstudy
AT dhananjayagarwal employmentandqualityoflifepostkidneytransplantarewejustifyingthechoiceofrrtacrosssectionalstudy
AT pankajbeniwal employmentandqualityoflifepostkidneytransplantarewejustifyingthechoiceofrrtacrosssectionalstudy
AT sanjeevsharma employmentandqualityoflifepostkidneytransplantarewejustifyingthechoiceofrrtacrosssectionalstudy
AT rajeshjorawat employmentandqualityoflifepostkidneytransplantarewejustifyingthechoiceofrrtacrosssectionalstudy
AT vartulgupta employmentandqualityoflifepostkidneytransplantarewejustifyingthechoiceofrrtacrosssectionalstudy
AT shivchada employmentandqualityoflifepostkidneytransplantarewejustifyingthechoiceofrrtacrosssectionalstudy
_version_ 1724546004191019008