Comparison of Six Different Silicones In Vitro for Application as Glaucoma Drainage Device

• Main Authors: Claudia Windhövel, Lisa Harder, Jan-Peter Bach, Michael Teske, Niels Grabow, Thomas Eickner, Ulf Hinze, Boris Chichkov, Ingo Nolte
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Published: MDPI AG 2018-02-01
• Series: Materials
• Subjects: silicone; glaucoma; fibrosis; Med-4234; SILUPRAN 2445A/B; Silastic MDX4-4210; LSR 40; 40,026; Silbione LSR 4330; Silbione LSR 4350
• Online Access: http://www.mdpi.com/1996-1944/11/3/341

Silicones are widely used in medical applications. In ophthalmology, glaucoma drainage devices are utilized if conservative therapies are not applicable or have failed. Long-term success of these devices is limited by failure to control intraocular pressure due to fibrous encapsulation. Therefore, different medical approved silicones were tested in vitro for cell adhesion, cell proliferation and viability of human Sclera (hSF) and human Tenon fibroblasts (hTF). The silicones were analysed also depending on the sample preparation according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The surface quality was characterized with environmental scanning electron microscope (ESEM) and water contact angle measurements. All silicones showed homogeneous smooth and hydrophobic surfaces. Cell adhesion was significantly reduced on all silicones compared to the negative control. Proliferation index and cell viability were not influenced much. For development of a new glaucoma drainage device, the silicones Silbione LSR 4330 and Silbione LSR 4350, in this study, with low cell counts for hTF and low proliferation indices for hSF, and silicone Silastic MDX4-4210, with low cell counts for hSF and low proliferation indices for hTF, have shown the best results in vitro. Due to the high cell adhesion shown on Silicone LSR 40, 40,026, this material is unsuitable.