Forbes 30 under 30 in education: Manufacturing “edu-preneur” networks to promote and reinforce privatization/marketization in education
Each year Forbes bestows a handful of “edu-preneurs” with the 30 Under 30 Award in Education (Under30), designating those individuals as the best hope for revolutionizing and reforming education. Boasting low recipient rates, Forbes elevates the manufactured expertise of awardees and the importance...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Arizona State University
2018-06-01
|
Series: | Education Policy Analysis Archives |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://epaa.asu.edu/ojs/article/view/3563 |
id |
doaj-6665695ae167427c87c80602d7ffc6d0 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-6665695ae167427c87c80602d7ffc6d02020-11-25T02:49:19ZengArizona State UniversityEducation Policy Analysis Archives1068-23412018-06-0126010.14507/epaa.26.35631771Forbes 30 under 30 in education: Manufacturing “edu-preneur” networks to promote and reinforce privatization/marketization in educationT. Jameson Brewer0Nicholas D. Hartlep1Ian M. Scott2University of North GeorgiaMetropolitan State UniversityUniversity of Illinois at Urbana-ChampaignEach year Forbes bestows a handful of “edu-preneurs” with the 30 Under 30 Award in Education (Under30), designating those individuals as the best hope for revolutionizing and reforming education. Boasting low recipient rates, Forbes elevates the manufactured expertise of awardees and the importance of their organizations and ventures. Further, Forbes employs the language and norms of neoliberalism to articulate a pro-market vision of education reform. This social network analytic (SNA) study seeks to untangle the edu-preneur network and critically examine the connections between awardees, their organizations, judges, and the larger education reform network. To this end, we utilized descriptive analyses and SNA. We find evidence that Under30 serves as a mechanism for promoting social closure and ideological homophily within education reform networks. Further, we consider the policy implications that such awards may have on public discourse and policy creation.https://epaa.asu.edu/ojs/article/view/3563Education PolicyPrivatizationMarketizationSocial ClosureNeoliberalismHomophilyEcho ChamberEdu-Preneur |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
T. Jameson Brewer Nicholas D. Hartlep Ian M. Scott |
spellingShingle |
T. Jameson Brewer Nicholas D. Hartlep Ian M. Scott Forbes 30 under 30 in education: Manufacturing “edu-preneur” networks to promote and reinforce privatization/marketization in education Education Policy Analysis Archives Education Policy Privatization Marketization Social Closure Neoliberalism Homophily Echo Chamber Edu-Preneur |
author_facet |
T. Jameson Brewer Nicholas D. Hartlep Ian M. Scott |
author_sort |
T. Jameson Brewer |
title |
Forbes 30 under 30 in education: Manufacturing “edu-preneur” networks to promote and reinforce privatization/marketization in education |
title_short |
Forbes 30 under 30 in education: Manufacturing “edu-preneur” networks to promote and reinforce privatization/marketization in education |
title_full |
Forbes 30 under 30 in education: Manufacturing “edu-preneur” networks to promote and reinforce privatization/marketization in education |
title_fullStr |
Forbes 30 under 30 in education: Manufacturing “edu-preneur” networks to promote and reinforce privatization/marketization in education |
title_full_unstemmed |
Forbes 30 under 30 in education: Manufacturing “edu-preneur” networks to promote and reinforce privatization/marketization in education |
title_sort |
forbes 30 under 30 in education: manufacturing “edu-preneur” networks to promote and reinforce privatization/marketization in education |
publisher |
Arizona State University |
series |
Education Policy Analysis Archives |
issn |
1068-2341 |
publishDate |
2018-06-01 |
description |
Each year Forbes bestows a handful of “edu-preneurs” with the 30 Under 30 Award in Education (Under30), designating those individuals as the best hope for revolutionizing and reforming education. Boasting low recipient rates, Forbes elevates the manufactured expertise of awardees and the importance of their organizations and ventures. Further, Forbes employs the language and norms of neoliberalism to articulate a pro-market vision of education reform. This social network analytic (SNA) study seeks to untangle the edu-preneur network and critically examine the connections between awardees, their organizations, judges, and the larger education reform network. To this end, we utilized descriptive analyses and SNA. We find evidence that Under30 serves as a mechanism for promoting social closure and ideological homophily within education reform networks. Further, we consider the policy implications that such awards may have on public discourse and policy creation. |
topic |
Education Policy Privatization Marketization Social Closure Neoliberalism Homophily Echo Chamber Edu-Preneur |
url |
https://epaa.asu.edu/ojs/article/view/3563 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT tjamesonbrewer forbes30under30ineducationmanufacturingedupreneurnetworkstopromoteandreinforceprivatizationmarketizationineducation AT nicholasdhartlep forbes30under30ineducationmanufacturingedupreneurnetworkstopromoteandreinforceprivatizationmarketizationineducation AT ianmscott forbes30under30ineducationmanufacturingedupreneurnetworkstopromoteandreinforceprivatizationmarketizationineducation |
_version_ |
1724744247291150336 |