Forbes 30 under 30 in education: Manufacturing “edu-preneur” networks to promote and reinforce privatization/marketization in education

Each year Forbes bestows a handful of “edu-preneurs” with the 30 Under 30 Award in Education (Under30), designating those individuals as the best hope for revolutionizing and reforming education. Boasting low recipient rates, Forbes elevates the manufactured expertise of awardees and the importance...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: T. Jameson Brewer, Nicholas D. Hartlep, Ian M. Scott
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Arizona State University 2018-06-01
Series:Education Policy Analysis Archives
Subjects:
Online Access:https://epaa.asu.edu/ojs/article/view/3563
id doaj-6665695ae167427c87c80602d7ffc6d0
record_format Article
spelling doaj-6665695ae167427c87c80602d7ffc6d02020-11-25T02:49:19ZengArizona State UniversityEducation Policy Analysis Archives1068-23412018-06-0126010.14507/epaa.26.35631771Forbes 30 under 30 in education: Manufacturing “edu-preneur” networks to promote and reinforce privatization/marketization in educationT. Jameson Brewer0Nicholas D. Hartlep1Ian M. Scott2University of North GeorgiaMetropolitan State UniversityUniversity of Illinois at Urbana-ChampaignEach year Forbes bestows a handful of “edu-preneurs” with the 30 Under 30 Award in Education (Under30), designating those individuals as the best hope for revolutionizing and reforming education. Boasting low recipient rates, Forbes elevates the manufactured expertise of awardees and the importance of their organizations and ventures. Further, Forbes employs the language and norms of neoliberalism to articulate a pro-market vision of education reform. This social network analytic (SNA) study seeks to untangle the edu-preneur network and critically examine the connections between awardees, their organizations, judges, and the larger education reform network. To this end, we utilized descriptive analyses and SNA. We find evidence that Under30 serves as a mechanism for promoting social closure and ideological homophily within education reform networks. Further, we consider the policy implications that such awards may have on public discourse and policy creation.https://epaa.asu.edu/ojs/article/view/3563Education PolicyPrivatizationMarketizationSocial ClosureNeoliberalismHomophilyEcho ChamberEdu-Preneur
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author T. Jameson Brewer
Nicholas D. Hartlep
Ian M. Scott
spellingShingle T. Jameson Brewer
Nicholas D. Hartlep
Ian M. Scott
Forbes 30 under 30 in education: Manufacturing “edu-preneur” networks to promote and reinforce privatization/marketization in education
Education Policy Analysis Archives
Education Policy
Privatization
Marketization
Social Closure
Neoliberalism
Homophily
Echo Chamber
Edu-Preneur
author_facet T. Jameson Brewer
Nicholas D. Hartlep
Ian M. Scott
author_sort T. Jameson Brewer
title Forbes 30 under 30 in education: Manufacturing “edu-preneur” networks to promote and reinforce privatization/marketization in education
title_short Forbes 30 under 30 in education: Manufacturing “edu-preneur” networks to promote and reinforce privatization/marketization in education
title_full Forbes 30 under 30 in education: Manufacturing “edu-preneur” networks to promote and reinforce privatization/marketization in education
title_fullStr Forbes 30 under 30 in education: Manufacturing “edu-preneur” networks to promote and reinforce privatization/marketization in education
title_full_unstemmed Forbes 30 under 30 in education: Manufacturing “edu-preneur” networks to promote and reinforce privatization/marketization in education
title_sort forbes 30 under 30 in education: manufacturing “edu-preneur” networks to promote and reinforce privatization/marketization in education
publisher Arizona State University
series Education Policy Analysis Archives
issn 1068-2341
publishDate 2018-06-01
description Each year Forbes bestows a handful of “edu-preneurs” with the 30 Under 30 Award in Education (Under30), designating those individuals as the best hope for revolutionizing and reforming education. Boasting low recipient rates, Forbes elevates the manufactured expertise of awardees and the importance of their organizations and ventures. Further, Forbes employs the language and norms of neoliberalism to articulate a pro-market vision of education reform. This social network analytic (SNA) study seeks to untangle the edu-preneur network and critically examine the connections between awardees, their organizations, judges, and the larger education reform network. To this end, we utilized descriptive analyses and SNA. We find evidence that Under30 serves as a mechanism for promoting social closure and ideological homophily within education reform networks. Further, we consider the policy implications that such awards may have on public discourse and policy creation.
topic Education Policy
Privatization
Marketization
Social Closure
Neoliberalism
Homophily
Echo Chamber
Edu-Preneur
url https://epaa.asu.edu/ojs/article/view/3563
work_keys_str_mv AT tjamesonbrewer forbes30under30ineducationmanufacturingedupreneurnetworkstopromoteandreinforceprivatizationmarketizationineducation
AT nicholasdhartlep forbes30under30ineducationmanufacturingedupreneurnetworkstopromoteandreinforceprivatizationmarketizationineducation
AT ianmscott forbes30under30ineducationmanufacturingedupreneurnetworkstopromoteandreinforceprivatizationmarketizationineducation
_version_ 1724744247291150336