Intrastriatal convection-enhanced delivery results in widespread perivascular distribution in a pre-clinical model
<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Convection-enhanced delivery (CED), a direct method for drug delivery to the brain through intraparenchymal microcatheters, is a promising strategy for intracerebral pharmacological therapy. By establishing a pressure gradient at the...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2012-01-01
|
Series: | Fluids and Barriers of the CNS |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.fluidsbarrierscns.com/content/9/1/2 |
id |
doaj-66609fb68cb34954893133b071631704 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-66609fb68cb34954893133b0716317042020-11-25T00:22:19ZengBMCFluids and Barriers of the CNS2045-81182012-01-0191210.1186/2045-8118-9-2Intrastriatal convection-enhanced delivery results in widespread perivascular distribution in a pre-clinical modelBarua Neil UBienemann Alison SHesketh ShirleyWyatt Marcella JCastrique EmmaLove SethGill Steven S<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Convection-enhanced delivery (CED), a direct method for drug delivery to the brain through intraparenchymal microcatheters, is a promising strategy for intracerebral pharmacological therapy. By establishing a pressure gradient at the tip of the catheter, drugs can be delivered in uniform concentration throughout a large volume of interstitial fluid. However, the variables affecting perivascular distribution of drugs delivered by CED are not fully understood. The aim of this study was to determine whether the perivascular distribution of solutes delivered by CED into the striatum of rats is affected by the molecular weight of the infused agent, by co-infusion of vasodilator, alteration of infusion rates or use of a ramping regime. We also wanted to make a preliminary comparison of the distribution of solutes with that of nanoparticles.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>We analysed the perivascular distribution of 4, 10, 20, 70, 150 kDa fluorescein-labelled dextran and fluorescent nanoparticles at 10 min and 3 h following CED into rat striatum. We investigated the effect of local vasodilatation, slow infusion rates and ramping on the perivascular distribution of solutes. Co-localisation with perivascular basement membranes and vascular endothelial cells was identified by immunohistochemistry. The uptake of infusates by perivascular macrophages was quantified using stereological methods.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Widespread perivascular distribution and macrophage uptake of fluorescein-labelled dextran was visible 10 min after cessation of CED irrespective of molecular weight. However, a significantly higher proportion of perivascular macrophages had taken up 4, 10 and 20 kDa fluorescein-labelled dextran than 150 kDa dextran (<it>p </it>< 0.05, ANOVA). Co-infusion with vasodilator, slow infusion rates and use of a ramping regime did not alter the perivascular distribution. CED of fluorescent nanoparticles indicated that particles co-localise with perivascular basement membranes throughout the striatum but, unlike soluble dextrans, are not taken up by perivascular macrophages after 3 h.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>This study suggests that widespread perivascular distribution and interaction with perivascular macrophages is likely to be an inevitable consequence of CED of solutes. The potential consequences of perivascular distribution of therapeutic agents, and in particular cytotoxic chemotherapies, delivered by CED must be carefully considered to ensure safe and effective translation to clinical trials.</p> http://www.fluidsbarrierscns.com/content/9/1/2Convection-enhanced deliverydextranssolutesperivascularmacrophagesnanoparticles |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Barua Neil U Bienemann Alison S Hesketh Shirley Wyatt Marcella J Castrique Emma Love Seth Gill Steven S |
spellingShingle |
Barua Neil U Bienemann Alison S Hesketh Shirley Wyatt Marcella J Castrique Emma Love Seth Gill Steven S Intrastriatal convection-enhanced delivery results in widespread perivascular distribution in a pre-clinical model Fluids and Barriers of the CNS Convection-enhanced delivery dextrans solutes perivascular macrophages nanoparticles |
author_facet |
Barua Neil U Bienemann Alison S Hesketh Shirley Wyatt Marcella J Castrique Emma Love Seth Gill Steven S |
author_sort |
Barua Neil U |
title |
Intrastriatal convection-enhanced delivery results in widespread perivascular distribution in a pre-clinical model |
title_short |
Intrastriatal convection-enhanced delivery results in widespread perivascular distribution in a pre-clinical model |
title_full |
Intrastriatal convection-enhanced delivery results in widespread perivascular distribution in a pre-clinical model |
title_fullStr |
Intrastriatal convection-enhanced delivery results in widespread perivascular distribution in a pre-clinical model |
title_full_unstemmed |
Intrastriatal convection-enhanced delivery results in widespread perivascular distribution in a pre-clinical model |
title_sort |
intrastriatal convection-enhanced delivery results in widespread perivascular distribution in a pre-clinical model |
publisher |
BMC |
series |
Fluids and Barriers of the CNS |
issn |
2045-8118 |
publishDate |
2012-01-01 |
description |
<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Convection-enhanced delivery (CED), a direct method for drug delivery to the brain through intraparenchymal microcatheters, is a promising strategy for intracerebral pharmacological therapy. By establishing a pressure gradient at the tip of the catheter, drugs can be delivered in uniform concentration throughout a large volume of interstitial fluid. However, the variables affecting perivascular distribution of drugs delivered by CED are not fully understood. The aim of this study was to determine whether the perivascular distribution of solutes delivered by CED into the striatum of rats is affected by the molecular weight of the infused agent, by co-infusion of vasodilator, alteration of infusion rates or use of a ramping regime. We also wanted to make a preliminary comparison of the distribution of solutes with that of nanoparticles.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>We analysed the perivascular distribution of 4, 10, 20, 70, 150 kDa fluorescein-labelled dextran and fluorescent nanoparticles at 10 min and 3 h following CED into rat striatum. We investigated the effect of local vasodilatation, slow infusion rates and ramping on the perivascular distribution of solutes. Co-localisation with perivascular basement membranes and vascular endothelial cells was identified by immunohistochemistry. The uptake of infusates by perivascular macrophages was quantified using stereological methods.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Widespread perivascular distribution and macrophage uptake of fluorescein-labelled dextran was visible 10 min after cessation of CED irrespective of molecular weight. However, a significantly higher proportion of perivascular macrophages had taken up 4, 10 and 20 kDa fluorescein-labelled dextran than 150 kDa dextran (<it>p </it>< 0.05, ANOVA). Co-infusion with vasodilator, slow infusion rates and use of a ramping regime did not alter the perivascular distribution. CED of fluorescent nanoparticles indicated that particles co-localise with perivascular basement membranes throughout the striatum but, unlike soluble dextrans, are not taken up by perivascular macrophages after 3 h.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>This study suggests that widespread perivascular distribution and interaction with perivascular macrophages is likely to be an inevitable consequence of CED of solutes. The potential consequences of perivascular distribution of therapeutic agents, and in particular cytotoxic chemotherapies, delivered by CED must be carefully considered to ensure safe and effective translation to clinical trials.</p> |
topic |
Convection-enhanced delivery dextrans solutes perivascular macrophages nanoparticles |
url |
http://www.fluidsbarrierscns.com/content/9/1/2 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT baruaneilu intrastriatalconvectionenhanceddeliveryresultsinwidespreadperivasculardistributioninapreclinicalmodel AT bienemannalisons intrastriatalconvectionenhanceddeliveryresultsinwidespreadperivasculardistributioninapreclinicalmodel AT heskethshirley intrastriatalconvectionenhanceddeliveryresultsinwidespreadperivasculardistributioninapreclinicalmodel AT wyattmarcellaj intrastriatalconvectionenhanceddeliveryresultsinwidespreadperivasculardistributioninapreclinicalmodel AT castriqueemma intrastriatalconvectionenhanceddeliveryresultsinwidespreadperivasculardistributioninapreclinicalmodel AT loveseth intrastriatalconvectionenhanceddeliveryresultsinwidespreadperivasculardistributioninapreclinicalmodel AT gillstevens intrastriatalconvectionenhanceddeliveryresultsinwidespreadperivasculardistributioninapreclinicalmodel |
_version_ |
1725360372196573184 |