Intrastriatal convection-enhanced delivery results in widespread perivascular distribution in a pre-clinical model

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Convection-enhanced delivery (CED), a direct method for drug delivery to the brain through intraparenchymal microcatheters, is a promising strategy for intracerebral pharmacological therapy. By establishing a pressure gradient at the...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Barua Neil U, Bienemann Alison S, Hesketh Shirley, Wyatt Marcella J, Castrique Emma, Love Seth, Gill Steven S
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2012-01-01
Series:Fluids and Barriers of the CNS
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.fluidsbarrierscns.com/content/9/1/2
id doaj-66609fb68cb34954893133b071631704
record_format Article
spelling doaj-66609fb68cb34954893133b0716317042020-11-25T00:22:19ZengBMCFluids and Barriers of the CNS2045-81182012-01-0191210.1186/2045-8118-9-2Intrastriatal convection-enhanced delivery results in widespread perivascular distribution in a pre-clinical modelBarua Neil UBienemann Alison SHesketh ShirleyWyatt Marcella JCastrique EmmaLove SethGill Steven S<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Convection-enhanced delivery (CED), a direct method for drug delivery to the brain through intraparenchymal microcatheters, is a promising strategy for intracerebral pharmacological therapy. By establishing a pressure gradient at the tip of the catheter, drugs can be delivered in uniform concentration throughout a large volume of interstitial fluid. However, the variables affecting perivascular distribution of drugs delivered by CED are not fully understood. The aim of this study was to determine whether the perivascular distribution of solutes delivered by CED into the striatum of rats is affected by the molecular weight of the infused agent, by co-infusion of vasodilator, alteration of infusion rates or use of a ramping regime. We also wanted to make a preliminary comparison of the distribution of solutes with that of nanoparticles.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>We analysed the perivascular distribution of 4, 10, 20, 70, 150 kDa fluorescein-labelled dextran and fluorescent nanoparticles at 10 min and 3 h following CED into rat striatum. We investigated the effect of local vasodilatation, slow infusion rates and ramping on the perivascular distribution of solutes. Co-localisation with perivascular basement membranes and vascular endothelial cells was identified by immunohistochemistry. The uptake of infusates by perivascular macrophages was quantified using stereological methods.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Widespread perivascular distribution and macrophage uptake of fluorescein-labelled dextran was visible 10 min after cessation of CED irrespective of molecular weight. However, a significantly higher proportion of perivascular macrophages had taken up 4, 10 and 20 kDa fluorescein-labelled dextran than 150 kDa dextran (<it>p </it>< 0.05, ANOVA). Co-infusion with vasodilator, slow infusion rates and use of a ramping regime did not alter the perivascular distribution. CED of fluorescent nanoparticles indicated that particles co-localise with perivascular basement membranes throughout the striatum but, unlike soluble dextrans, are not taken up by perivascular macrophages after 3 h.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>This study suggests that widespread perivascular distribution and interaction with perivascular macrophages is likely to be an inevitable consequence of CED of solutes. The potential consequences of perivascular distribution of therapeutic agents, and in particular cytotoxic chemotherapies, delivered by CED must be carefully considered to ensure safe and effective translation to clinical trials.</p> http://www.fluidsbarrierscns.com/content/9/1/2Convection-enhanced deliverydextranssolutesperivascularmacrophagesnanoparticles
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Barua Neil U
Bienemann Alison S
Hesketh Shirley
Wyatt Marcella J
Castrique Emma
Love Seth
Gill Steven S
spellingShingle Barua Neil U
Bienemann Alison S
Hesketh Shirley
Wyatt Marcella J
Castrique Emma
Love Seth
Gill Steven S
Intrastriatal convection-enhanced delivery results in widespread perivascular distribution in a pre-clinical model
Fluids and Barriers of the CNS
Convection-enhanced delivery
dextrans
solutes
perivascular
macrophages
nanoparticles
author_facet Barua Neil U
Bienemann Alison S
Hesketh Shirley
Wyatt Marcella J
Castrique Emma
Love Seth
Gill Steven S
author_sort Barua Neil U
title Intrastriatal convection-enhanced delivery results in widespread perivascular distribution in a pre-clinical model
title_short Intrastriatal convection-enhanced delivery results in widespread perivascular distribution in a pre-clinical model
title_full Intrastriatal convection-enhanced delivery results in widespread perivascular distribution in a pre-clinical model
title_fullStr Intrastriatal convection-enhanced delivery results in widespread perivascular distribution in a pre-clinical model
title_full_unstemmed Intrastriatal convection-enhanced delivery results in widespread perivascular distribution in a pre-clinical model
title_sort intrastriatal convection-enhanced delivery results in widespread perivascular distribution in a pre-clinical model
publisher BMC
series Fluids and Barriers of the CNS
issn 2045-8118
publishDate 2012-01-01
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Convection-enhanced delivery (CED), a direct method for drug delivery to the brain through intraparenchymal microcatheters, is a promising strategy for intracerebral pharmacological therapy. By establishing a pressure gradient at the tip of the catheter, drugs can be delivered in uniform concentration throughout a large volume of interstitial fluid. However, the variables affecting perivascular distribution of drugs delivered by CED are not fully understood. The aim of this study was to determine whether the perivascular distribution of solutes delivered by CED into the striatum of rats is affected by the molecular weight of the infused agent, by co-infusion of vasodilator, alteration of infusion rates or use of a ramping regime. We also wanted to make a preliminary comparison of the distribution of solutes with that of nanoparticles.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>We analysed the perivascular distribution of 4, 10, 20, 70, 150 kDa fluorescein-labelled dextran and fluorescent nanoparticles at 10 min and 3 h following CED into rat striatum. We investigated the effect of local vasodilatation, slow infusion rates and ramping on the perivascular distribution of solutes. Co-localisation with perivascular basement membranes and vascular endothelial cells was identified by immunohistochemistry. The uptake of infusates by perivascular macrophages was quantified using stereological methods.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Widespread perivascular distribution and macrophage uptake of fluorescein-labelled dextran was visible 10 min after cessation of CED irrespective of molecular weight. However, a significantly higher proportion of perivascular macrophages had taken up 4, 10 and 20 kDa fluorescein-labelled dextran than 150 kDa dextran (<it>p </it>< 0.05, ANOVA). Co-infusion with vasodilator, slow infusion rates and use of a ramping regime did not alter the perivascular distribution. CED of fluorescent nanoparticles indicated that particles co-localise with perivascular basement membranes throughout the striatum but, unlike soluble dextrans, are not taken up by perivascular macrophages after 3 h.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>This study suggests that widespread perivascular distribution and interaction with perivascular macrophages is likely to be an inevitable consequence of CED of solutes. The potential consequences of perivascular distribution of therapeutic agents, and in particular cytotoxic chemotherapies, delivered by CED must be carefully considered to ensure safe and effective translation to clinical trials.</p>
topic Convection-enhanced delivery
dextrans
solutes
perivascular
macrophages
nanoparticles
url http://www.fluidsbarrierscns.com/content/9/1/2
work_keys_str_mv AT baruaneilu intrastriatalconvectionenhanceddeliveryresultsinwidespreadperivasculardistributioninapreclinicalmodel
AT bienemannalisons intrastriatalconvectionenhanceddeliveryresultsinwidespreadperivasculardistributioninapreclinicalmodel
AT heskethshirley intrastriatalconvectionenhanceddeliveryresultsinwidespreadperivasculardistributioninapreclinicalmodel
AT wyattmarcellaj intrastriatalconvectionenhanceddeliveryresultsinwidespreadperivasculardistributioninapreclinicalmodel
AT castriqueemma intrastriatalconvectionenhanceddeliveryresultsinwidespreadperivasculardistributioninapreclinicalmodel
AT loveseth intrastriatalconvectionenhanceddeliveryresultsinwidespreadperivasculardistributioninapreclinicalmodel
AT gillstevens intrastriatalconvectionenhanceddeliveryresultsinwidespreadperivasculardistributioninapreclinicalmodel
_version_ 1725360372196573184