A Bayesian approach to evaluation of soil biogeochemical models

<p>To make predictions about the carbon cycling consequences of rising global surface temperatures, Earth system scientists rely on mathematical soil biogeochemical models (SBMs). However, it is not clear which models have better predictive accuracy, and a rigorous quantitative approach for co...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: H. W. Xie, A. L. Romero-Olivares, M. Guindani, S. D. Allison
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2020-08-01
Series:Biogeosciences
Online Access:https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/17/4043/2020/bg-17-4043-2020.pdf
id doaj-6622f9e1a1b24090842b0d751cf10422
record_format Article
spelling doaj-6622f9e1a1b24090842b0d751cf104222020-11-25T03:55:42ZengCopernicus PublicationsBiogeosciences1726-41701726-41892020-08-01174043405710.5194/bg-17-4043-2020A Bayesian approach to evaluation of soil biogeochemical modelsH. W. Xie0A. L. Romero-Olivares1M. Guindani2S. D. Allison3Center for Complex Biological Systems, University of California, Irvine, 2620 Biological Sciences III, Irvine, California 92697, USADepartment of Natural Resources and the Environment, University of New Hampshire, 114 James Hall, Durham, New Hampshire 03824, USADepartment of Statistics, University of California, Irvine, 2241 Donald Bren Hall, Irvine, California 92697, USADepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Department of Earth System Science, 321 Steinhaus Hall, University of California, Irvine, California 92697, USA<p>To make predictions about the carbon cycling consequences of rising global surface temperatures, Earth system scientists rely on mathematical soil biogeochemical models (SBMs). However, it is not clear which models have better predictive accuracy, and a rigorous quantitative approach for comparing and validating the predictions has yet to be established. In this study, we present a Bayesian approach to SBM comparison that can be incorporated into a statistical model selection framework. We compared the fits of linear and nonlinear SBMs to soil respiration data compiled in a recent meta-analysis of soil warming field experiments. Fit quality was quantified using Bayesian goodness-of-fit metrics, including the widely applicable information criterion (WAIC) and leave-one-out cross validation (LOO). We found that the linear model generally outperformed the nonlinear model at fitting the meta-analysis data set. Both WAIC and LOO computed higher overfitting risk and effective numbers of parameters for the nonlinear model compared to the linear model, conditional on the data set. Goodness of fit for both models generally improved when they were initialized with lower and more realistic steady-state soil organic carbon densities. Still, testing whether linear models offer definitively superior predictive performance over nonlinear models on a global scale will require comparisons with additional site-specific data sets of suitable size and dimensionality. Such comparisons can build upon the approach defined in this study to make more rigorous statistical determinations about model accuracy while leveraging emerging data sets, such as those from long-term ecological research experiments.</p>https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/17/4043/2020/bg-17-4043-2020.pdf
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author H. W. Xie
A. L. Romero-Olivares
M. Guindani
S. D. Allison
spellingShingle H. W. Xie
A. L. Romero-Olivares
M. Guindani
S. D. Allison
A Bayesian approach to evaluation of soil biogeochemical models
Biogeosciences
author_facet H. W. Xie
A. L. Romero-Olivares
M. Guindani
S. D. Allison
author_sort H. W. Xie
title A Bayesian approach to evaluation of soil biogeochemical models
title_short A Bayesian approach to evaluation of soil biogeochemical models
title_full A Bayesian approach to evaluation of soil biogeochemical models
title_fullStr A Bayesian approach to evaluation of soil biogeochemical models
title_full_unstemmed A Bayesian approach to evaluation of soil biogeochemical models
title_sort bayesian approach to evaluation of soil biogeochemical models
publisher Copernicus Publications
series Biogeosciences
issn 1726-4170
1726-4189
publishDate 2020-08-01
description <p>To make predictions about the carbon cycling consequences of rising global surface temperatures, Earth system scientists rely on mathematical soil biogeochemical models (SBMs). However, it is not clear which models have better predictive accuracy, and a rigorous quantitative approach for comparing and validating the predictions has yet to be established. In this study, we present a Bayesian approach to SBM comparison that can be incorporated into a statistical model selection framework. We compared the fits of linear and nonlinear SBMs to soil respiration data compiled in a recent meta-analysis of soil warming field experiments. Fit quality was quantified using Bayesian goodness-of-fit metrics, including the widely applicable information criterion (WAIC) and leave-one-out cross validation (LOO). We found that the linear model generally outperformed the nonlinear model at fitting the meta-analysis data set. Both WAIC and LOO computed higher overfitting risk and effective numbers of parameters for the nonlinear model compared to the linear model, conditional on the data set. Goodness of fit for both models generally improved when they were initialized with lower and more realistic steady-state soil organic carbon densities. Still, testing whether linear models offer definitively superior predictive performance over nonlinear models on a global scale will require comparisons with additional site-specific data sets of suitable size and dimensionality. Such comparisons can build upon the approach defined in this study to make more rigorous statistical determinations about model accuracy while leveraging emerging data sets, such as those from long-term ecological research experiments.</p>
url https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/17/4043/2020/bg-17-4043-2020.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT hwxie abayesianapproachtoevaluationofsoilbiogeochemicalmodels
AT alromeroolivares abayesianapproachtoevaluationofsoilbiogeochemicalmodels
AT mguindani abayesianapproachtoevaluationofsoilbiogeochemicalmodels
AT sdallison abayesianapproachtoevaluationofsoilbiogeochemicalmodels
AT hwxie bayesianapproachtoevaluationofsoilbiogeochemicalmodels
AT alromeroolivares bayesianapproachtoevaluationofsoilbiogeochemicalmodels
AT mguindani bayesianapproachtoevaluationofsoilbiogeochemicalmodels
AT sdallison bayesianapproachtoevaluationofsoilbiogeochemicalmodels
_version_ 1724468673348894720