Rater Cognition in L2 Speaking Assessment: A Review of the Literature

This literature review surveys representative studies within the context of L2 speaking assessment that have contributed to the conceptualization of rater cognition. Two types of studies are looked at: 1) studies that examine how raters differ (and sometimes agree) in their cognitive processes and r...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Qie Han
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Columbia University Libraries 2016-05-01
Series:Studies in Applied Linguistics & TESOL
Online Access:https://journals.library.columbia.edu/index.php/SALT/article/view/1261
id doaj-661f97efb86a4372aae318406e3d4527
record_format Article
spelling doaj-661f97efb86a4372aae318406e3d45272020-11-25T02:40:30ZengColumbia University LibrariesStudies in Applied Linguistics & TESOL2689-193X2016-05-0116110.7916/salt.v16i1.1261Rater Cognition in L2 Speaking Assessment: A Review of the LiteratureQie HanThis literature review surveys representative studies within the context of L2 speaking assessment that have contributed to the conceptualization of rater cognition. Two types of studies are looked at: 1) studies that examine how raters differ (and sometimes agree) in their cognitive processes and rating behaviors, in terms of their focus and feature attention, approaches to scoring, and treatment of the scoring criteria and non-criteria relevant aspects and features of the speaking performance; 2) studies that explore why raters differ, through the analysis of the interactions between several rater background factors (i.e., rater language background, rater experience and rater training) and their rating behaviors and decision-making processes. The two types of studies have improved our understanding of the nature and the causes of rater variability in their perception and evaluation of L2 speech. However, few studies has drawn on existing theories of human information processing and research on strategy use, which can explain on a cognitive-processing (Purpura, 2014) level what goes on in raters’ mind during assessment. It is argued as a final conclusion that only based on established frameworks of human information processing and research on (meta)cognitive strategy use can rater cognition be explored with more depth and breadth. https://journals.library.columbia.edu/index.php/SALT/article/view/1261
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Qie Han
spellingShingle Qie Han
Rater Cognition in L2 Speaking Assessment: A Review of the Literature
Studies in Applied Linguistics & TESOL
author_facet Qie Han
author_sort Qie Han
title Rater Cognition in L2 Speaking Assessment: A Review of the Literature
title_short Rater Cognition in L2 Speaking Assessment: A Review of the Literature
title_full Rater Cognition in L2 Speaking Assessment: A Review of the Literature
title_fullStr Rater Cognition in L2 Speaking Assessment: A Review of the Literature
title_full_unstemmed Rater Cognition in L2 Speaking Assessment: A Review of the Literature
title_sort rater cognition in l2 speaking assessment: a review of the literature
publisher Columbia University Libraries
series Studies in Applied Linguistics & TESOL
issn 2689-193X
publishDate 2016-05-01
description This literature review surveys representative studies within the context of L2 speaking assessment that have contributed to the conceptualization of rater cognition. Two types of studies are looked at: 1) studies that examine how raters differ (and sometimes agree) in their cognitive processes and rating behaviors, in terms of their focus and feature attention, approaches to scoring, and treatment of the scoring criteria and non-criteria relevant aspects and features of the speaking performance; 2) studies that explore why raters differ, through the analysis of the interactions between several rater background factors (i.e., rater language background, rater experience and rater training) and their rating behaviors and decision-making processes. The two types of studies have improved our understanding of the nature and the causes of rater variability in their perception and evaluation of L2 speech. However, few studies has drawn on existing theories of human information processing and research on strategy use, which can explain on a cognitive-processing (Purpura, 2014) level what goes on in raters’ mind during assessment. It is argued as a final conclusion that only based on established frameworks of human information processing and research on (meta)cognitive strategy use can rater cognition be explored with more depth and breadth.
url https://journals.library.columbia.edu/index.php/SALT/article/view/1261
work_keys_str_mv AT qiehan ratercognitioninl2speakingassessmentareviewoftheliterature
_version_ 1724781228961300480