A Comparison of Two Anastomotic Techniques in the Jejunum of the Goat

This study was carried out to test two different anastomotic techniques to identify advantages and disadvantages of each technique in goats. All animals were under local infiltration anaesthesia. A five-cm length of jejunum was resected from the first part of the jejunum and end to end anastomosis u...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: H. A. Al-Timmemi, Karim Al-Jashamy, Mohammed S. Dauod
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Limited 2010-01-01
Series:Veterinary Medicine International
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.4061/2010/139610
id doaj-661ebfa6558a46059954fac327ec064e
record_format Article
spelling doaj-661ebfa6558a46059954fac327ec064e2020-11-24T20:56:58ZengHindawi LimitedVeterinary Medicine International2042-00482010-01-01201010.4061/2010/139610139610A Comparison of Two Anastomotic Techniques in the Jejunum of the GoatH. A. Al-Timmemi0Karim Al-Jashamy1Mohammed S. Dauod2Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Selangor 43400, MalaysiaMedical School, SEGi University College, 47810 Petaling Jaya, Selangor, MalaysiaFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, Baghdad University, 1963 Al-aameria, Baghdad, IraqThis study was carried out to test two different anastomotic techniques to identify advantages and disadvantages of each technique in goats. All animals were under local infiltration anaesthesia. A five-cm length of jejunum was resected from the first part of the jejunum and end to end anastomosis using 3-0 Polygalactin-910 with one row of sero-submoucosal interrupted sutures (SSIS) group, and one row of horizontal mattress interrupted sutures (HMIS) group. Two animals from each group were euthanized on the 4th, 14th and 21st postoperative days. A 7-cm segment of jejunum including the anastomosed area was resected from each animal. There was no significant adhesion between anastomosis area and surrounded tissues observed in SSIS animals, while there was significant adhesion between anastomosis area and surrounded tissues which were observed in HMIS animals. Stenosis degree was lower in the SSIS than the HMIS group. The bursting pressure was higher in the SSIS than the HMIS group. Macroscopic evaluation indicated that the anastomotic line mucosa was abridged better with less local edema in the SSIS group. Histological evaluation in the SSIS group showed almost all parameters such as epithelial recovery and repair of submucosal-mucosal layer demonstrated better healing compared to the HMIS group.http://dx.doi.org/10.4061/2010/139610
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author H. A. Al-Timmemi
Karim Al-Jashamy
Mohammed S. Dauod
spellingShingle H. A. Al-Timmemi
Karim Al-Jashamy
Mohammed S. Dauod
A Comparison of Two Anastomotic Techniques in the Jejunum of the Goat
Veterinary Medicine International
author_facet H. A. Al-Timmemi
Karim Al-Jashamy
Mohammed S. Dauod
author_sort H. A. Al-Timmemi
title A Comparison of Two Anastomotic Techniques in the Jejunum of the Goat
title_short A Comparison of Two Anastomotic Techniques in the Jejunum of the Goat
title_full A Comparison of Two Anastomotic Techniques in the Jejunum of the Goat
title_fullStr A Comparison of Two Anastomotic Techniques in the Jejunum of the Goat
title_full_unstemmed A Comparison of Two Anastomotic Techniques in the Jejunum of the Goat
title_sort comparison of two anastomotic techniques in the jejunum of the goat
publisher Hindawi Limited
series Veterinary Medicine International
issn 2042-0048
publishDate 2010-01-01
description This study was carried out to test two different anastomotic techniques to identify advantages and disadvantages of each technique in goats. All animals were under local infiltration anaesthesia. A five-cm length of jejunum was resected from the first part of the jejunum and end to end anastomosis using 3-0 Polygalactin-910 with one row of sero-submoucosal interrupted sutures (SSIS) group, and one row of horizontal mattress interrupted sutures (HMIS) group. Two animals from each group were euthanized on the 4th, 14th and 21st postoperative days. A 7-cm segment of jejunum including the anastomosed area was resected from each animal. There was no significant adhesion between anastomosis area and surrounded tissues observed in SSIS animals, while there was significant adhesion between anastomosis area and surrounded tissues which were observed in HMIS animals. Stenosis degree was lower in the SSIS than the HMIS group. The bursting pressure was higher in the SSIS than the HMIS group. Macroscopic evaluation indicated that the anastomotic line mucosa was abridged better with less local edema in the SSIS group. Histological evaluation in the SSIS group showed almost all parameters such as epithelial recovery and repair of submucosal-mucosal layer demonstrated better healing compared to the HMIS group.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.4061/2010/139610
work_keys_str_mv AT haaltimmemi acomparisonoftwoanastomotictechniquesinthejejunumofthegoat
AT karimaljashamy acomparisonoftwoanastomotictechniquesinthejejunumofthegoat
AT mohammedsdauod acomparisonoftwoanastomotictechniquesinthejejunumofthegoat
AT haaltimmemi comparisonoftwoanastomotictechniquesinthejejunumofthegoat
AT karimaljashamy comparisonoftwoanastomotictechniquesinthejejunumofthegoat
AT mohammedsdauod comparisonoftwoanastomotictechniquesinthejejunumofthegoat
_version_ 1716789266415091712