Productive faculty resources activated by curricular materials: An example of epistemological beliefs in University Modeling Instruction

[This paper is part of the Focused Collection on Curriculum Development: Theory into Design.] When disseminating curricula, typically only the physical curriculum materials are transferred from the instructor to another. However, left as artifacts in the curricula are a set of epistemological belief...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Daryl McPadden, Eric Brewe, Camila Monsalve, Vashti Sawtelle
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: American Physical Society 2020-12-01
Series:Physical Review Physics Education Research
Online Access:http://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.16.020158
id doaj-65fd33ab77cf44ad934fc728d8d717b2
record_format Article
spelling doaj-65fd33ab77cf44ad934fc728d8d717b22021-02-11T23:49:18ZengAmerican Physical SocietyPhysical Review Physics Education Research2469-98962020-12-0116202015810.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.16.020158Productive faculty resources activated by curricular materials: An example of epistemological beliefs in University Modeling InstructionDaryl McPaddenEric BreweCamila MonsalveVashti Sawtelle[This paper is part of the Focused Collection on Curriculum Development: Theory into Design.] When disseminating curricula, typically only the physical curriculum materials are transferred from the instructor to another. However, left as artifacts in the curricula are a set of epistemological beliefs held by the creators and designers of the materials. These epistemological beliefs are often underpinning the activity structures and strongly influence how the curriculum materials are implemented in the classroom, particularly when those beliefs differ from those activated by the instructor. In this paper, we articulate three epistemological beliefs that are built into the University Modeling Instruction curriculum that are essential for running the large-group discussions, which are a crucial part of the curriculum. We highlight how these beliefs are built into the student-facing and instructor-facing curricular materials and the influence of these beliefs in the interpretation and implementation of the curriculum materials. Finally, we discuss the implications on curriculum dissemination, on the adoption and adaptation of curriculum materials, and training models for instructors beyond the curriculum designers.http://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.16.020158
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Daryl McPadden
Eric Brewe
Camila Monsalve
Vashti Sawtelle
spellingShingle Daryl McPadden
Eric Brewe
Camila Monsalve
Vashti Sawtelle
Productive faculty resources activated by curricular materials: An example of epistemological beliefs in University Modeling Instruction
Physical Review Physics Education Research
author_facet Daryl McPadden
Eric Brewe
Camila Monsalve
Vashti Sawtelle
author_sort Daryl McPadden
title Productive faculty resources activated by curricular materials: An example of epistemological beliefs in University Modeling Instruction
title_short Productive faculty resources activated by curricular materials: An example of epistemological beliefs in University Modeling Instruction
title_full Productive faculty resources activated by curricular materials: An example of epistemological beliefs in University Modeling Instruction
title_fullStr Productive faculty resources activated by curricular materials: An example of epistemological beliefs in University Modeling Instruction
title_full_unstemmed Productive faculty resources activated by curricular materials: An example of epistemological beliefs in University Modeling Instruction
title_sort productive faculty resources activated by curricular materials: an example of epistemological beliefs in university modeling instruction
publisher American Physical Society
series Physical Review Physics Education Research
issn 2469-9896
publishDate 2020-12-01
description [This paper is part of the Focused Collection on Curriculum Development: Theory into Design.] When disseminating curricula, typically only the physical curriculum materials are transferred from the instructor to another. However, left as artifacts in the curricula are a set of epistemological beliefs held by the creators and designers of the materials. These epistemological beliefs are often underpinning the activity structures and strongly influence how the curriculum materials are implemented in the classroom, particularly when those beliefs differ from those activated by the instructor. In this paper, we articulate three epistemological beliefs that are built into the University Modeling Instruction curriculum that are essential for running the large-group discussions, which are a crucial part of the curriculum. We highlight how these beliefs are built into the student-facing and instructor-facing curricular materials and the influence of these beliefs in the interpretation and implementation of the curriculum materials. Finally, we discuss the implications on curriculum dissemination, on the adoption and adaptation of curriculum materials, and training models for instructors beyond the curriculum designers.
url http://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.16.020158
work_keys_str_mv AT darylmcpadden productivefacultyresourcesactivatedbycurricularmaterialsanexampleofepistemologicalbeliefsinuniversitymodelinginstruction
AT ericbrewe productivefacultyresourcesactivatedbycurricularmaterialsanexampleofepistemologicalbeliefsinuniversitymodelinginstruction
AT camilamonsalve productivefacultyresourcesactivatedbycurricularmaterialsanexampleofepistemologicalbeliefsinuniversitymodelinginstruction
AT vashtisawtelle productivefacultyresourcesactivatedbycurricularmaterialsanexampleofepistemologicalbeliefsinuniversitymodelinginstruction
_version_ 1724274079258640384