INTERNET MOBILITY, CO-PRESENCE AND PURPOSE: CONTEXTUALISING INTERNATIONALISATION IN RESEARCH CAREERS

This paper addresses the role that co-presence plays in the process of researcher and research internationalisation. Put simply, it considers how much time researchers need to spend in particular places (outside of their own country) in order to generate optimal conditions for knowledge creation and...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Louise Ackers
Format: Article
Language:Spanish
Published: Universidad de Valladolid 2013-10-01
Series:Sociología y Tecnociencia
Online Access:http://localhost/phppro/ojs311/index.php/sociotecno/article/view/638
id doaj-65f0522d636146169a75ad2eab540848
record_format Article
spelling doaj-65f0522d636146169a75ad2eab5408482020-11-24T22:20:41ZspaUniversidad de ValladolidSociología y Tecnociencia1989-84872013-10-0133INTERNET MOBILITY, CO-PRESENCE AND PURPOSE: CONTEXTUALISING INTERNATIONALISATION IN RESEARCH CAREERSLouise AckersThis paper addresses the role that co-presence plays in the process of researcher and research internationalisation. Put simply, it considers how much time researchers need to spend in particular places (outside of their own country) in order to generate optimal conditions for knowledge creation and transfer. Drawing on empirical evidence gleaned from a range of recent research projects, it suggests that the need for co-presence is highly contextualised reflecting disciplinary and field-specific considerations. On the basis of this evidence, the paper critiques the received wisdom that permeates research policy in many national contexts equating excellence with internationalisation, and internationalisation with physical (and usually long stay) mobility. In so doing, it supports a growing concern that ‘researcher mobility should never be seen as an end-point in itself’ (ESF, 2013b:3). It builds on the author’s previous work on the relationship between gender, mobility and career progression (Ackers, 2008; 2010). This work, supported by that of other authors such as Cox (2008), established the importance of a growing ‘mobility imperative’ to the career progression of women. It also highlighted the role that the progressive institutionalisation of metrics associated with internationalisation was playing in this process (Ackers and Gill, 2008). Supporting a more evidence-based and nuanced approach to internationalisation, metrics goes some way to remove unintended consequences or discriminatory outcomes (Ackers, 2008) and to encourage a more merit-based approach to researcher evaluation.http://localhost/phppro/ojs311/index.php/sociotecno/article/view/638
collection DOAJ
language Spanish
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Louise Ackers
spellingShingle Louise Ackers
INTERNET MOBILITY, CO-PRESENCE AND PURPOSE: CONTEXTUALISING INTERNATIONALISATION IN RESEARCH CAREERS
Sociología y Tecnociencia
author_facet Louise Ackers
author_sort Louise Ackers
title INTERNET MOBILITY, CO-PRESENCE AND PURPOSE: CONTEXTUALISING INTERNATIONALISATION IN RESEARCH CAREERS
title_short INTERNET MOBILITY, CO-PRESENCE AND PURPOSE: CONTEXTUALISING INTERNATIONALISATION IN RESEARCH CAREERS
title_full INTERNET MOBILITY, CO-PRESENCE AND PURPOSE: CONTEXTUALISING INTERNATIONALISATION IN RESEARCH CAREERS
title_fullStr INTERNET MOBILITY, CO-PRESENCE AND PURPOSE: CONTEXTUALISING INTERNATIONALISATION IN RESEARCH CAREERS
title_full_unstemmed INTERNET MOBILITY, CO-PRESENCE AND PURPOSE: CONTEXTUALISING INTERNATIONALISATION IN RESEARCH CAREERS
title_sort internet mobility, co-presence and purpose: contextualising internationalisation in research careers
publisher Universidad de Valladolid
series Sociología y Tecnociencia
issn 1989-8487
publishDate 2013-10-01
description This paper addresses the role that co-presence plays in the process of researcher and research internationalisation. Put simply, it considers how much time researchers need to spend in particular places (outside of their own country) in order to generate optimal conditions for knowledge creation and transfer. Drawing on empirical evidence gleaned from a range of recent research projects, it suggests that the need for co-presence is highly contextualised reflecting disciplinary and field-specific considerations. On the basis of this evidence, the paper critiques the received wisdom that permeates research policy in many national contexts equating excellence with internationalisation, and internationalisation with physical (and usually long stay) mobility. In so doing, it supports a growing concern that ‘researcher mobility should never be seen as an end-point in itself’ (ESF, 2013b:3). It builds on the author’s previous work on the relationship between gender, mobility and career progression (Ackers, 2008; 2010). This work, supported by that of other authors such as Cox (2008), established the importance of a growing ‘mobility imperative’ to the career progression of women. It also highlighted the role that the progressive institutionalisation of metrics associated with internationalisation was playing in this process (Ackers and Gill, 2008). Supporting a more evidence-based and nuanced approach to internationalisation, metrics goes some way to remove unintended consequences or discriminatory outcomes (Ackers, 2008) and to encourage a more merit-based approach to researcher evaluation.
url http://localhost/phppro/ojs311/index.php/sociotecno/article/view/638
work_keys_str_mv AT louiseackers internetmobilitycopresenceandpurposecontextualisinginternationalisationinresearchcareers
_version_ 1725774548668776448