Prophecy as a religious language in the Radical Reformation. The prophetic role and authorial voice of HN and his Family of Love

The close relationship between prophecy and dissent is clear and well-researched. The example of the sixteenth-century charismatic Hendrik Niclaes, who wrote prophetical texts under the cryptonym HN, simply seems to be another case in point. Yet a close analysis of his language reveals a certain amb...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Andreas Pietsch
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Institut du Monde Anglophone 2017-10-01
Series:Etudes Epistémè
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journals.openedition.org/episteme/1713
id doaj-65eaa0cf22674d81b6905f5a2717a754
record_format Article
spelling doaj-65eaa0cf22674d81b6905f5a2717a7542020-11-25T01:03:45ZengInstitut du Monde AnglophoneEtudes Epistémè1634-04502017-10-013110.4000/episteme.1713Prophecy as a religious language in the Radical Reformation. The prophetic role and authorial voice of HN and his Family of LoveAndreas PietschThe close relationship between prophecy and dissent is clear and well-researched. The example of the sixteenth-century charismatic Hendrik Niclaes, who wrote prophetical texts under the cryptonym HN, simply seems to be another case in point. Yet a close analysis of his language reveals a certain ambivalence. While Niclaes used a prophetical voice as seen in several characteristic elements of authorship to establish a dissenting position of authority, he also remained very close to conventional ideas of holiness and biblical wisdom. This ambiguity does not seem to be merely a result of precautionary measures meant to avert persecution. It furthermore appears to be a conscious part of his prophetic voice, which both exalts and minimizes HN as an author. In exploring this, this contribution supplies further evidence in favour of arguments first made by Nigel Smith in 1989: Prophecy was a “religious language” for dissidents, and Niclaes was a virtuoso in this language. Paradoxically, the openness and ambiguity of his cryptonymic texts seem to have furthered their successful dissemination.http://journals.openedition.org/episteme/1713prophecyreligious languagedissentRadical ReformationFamily of Love
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Andreas Pietsch
spellingShingle Andreas Pietsch
Prophecy as a religious language in the Radical Reformation. The prophetic role and authorial voice of HN and his Family of Love
Etudes Epistémè
prophecy
religious language
dissent
Radical Reformation
Family of Love
author_facet Andreas Pietsch
author_sort Andreas Pietsch
title Prophecy as a religious language in the Radical Reformation. The prophetic role and authorial voice of HN and his Family of Love
title_short Prophecy as a religious language in the Radical Reformation. The prophetic role and authorial voice of HN and his Family of Love
title_full Prophecy as a religious language in the Radical Reformation. The prophetic role and authorial voice of HN and his Family of Love
title_fullStr Prophecy as a religious language in the Radical Reformation. The prophetic role and authorial voice of HN and his Family of Love
title_full_unstemmed Prophecy as a religious language in the Radical Reformation. The prophetic role and authorial voice of HN and his Family of Love
title_sort prophecy as a religious language in the radical reformation. the prophetic role and authorial voice of hn and his family of love
publisher Institut du Monde Anglophone
series Etudes Epistémè
issn 1634-0450
publishDate 2017-10-01
description The close relationship between prophecy and dissent is clear and well-researched. The example of the sixteenth-century charismatic Hendrik Niclaes, who wrote prophetical texts under the cryptonym HN, simply seems to be another case in point. Yet a close analysis of his language reveals a certain ambivalence. While Niclaes used a prophetical voice as seen in several characteristic elements of authorship to establish a dissenting position of authority, he also remained very close to conventional ideas of holiness and biblical wisdom. This ambiguity does not seem to be merely a result of precautionary measures meant to avert persecution. It furthermore appears to be a conscious part of his prophetic voice, which both exalts and minimizes HN as an author. In exploring this, this contribution supplies further evidence in favour of arguments first made by Nigel Smith in 1989: Prophecy was a “religious language” for dissidents, and Niclaes was a virtuoso in this language. Paradoxically, the openness and ambiguity of his cryptonymic texts seem to have furthered their successful dissemination.
topic prophecy
religious language
dissent
Radical Reformation
Family of Love
url http://journals.openedition.org/episteme/1713
work_keys_str_mv AT andreaspietsch prophecyasareligiouslanguageintheradicalreformationthepropheticroleandauthorialvoiceofhnandhisfamilyoflove
_version_ 1725199637620457472