A systematic review and meta-analysis of the safety and efficacy of uterine artery embolization vs. surgery for symptomatic uterine fibroids

ABSTRACT: Purpose: The aim of this study was to systematically review the safety and efficacy of uterine artery embolization (UAE) versus surgery for symptomatic uterine fibroids.Materials and Methods: An electronic search of the Cochrane Library, PubMed, Embase and Web of Science databases was cond...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Shiwei Tang, Mingxin Kong, Xinjian Zhao, Jun Chen, Chen Wang, Haibin Zhang, Zhongmin Wang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: KeAi Communications Co., Ltd. 2018-05-01
Series:Journal of Interventional Medicine
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2096360219300262
id doaj-65d93f8671e240dc910b4abde1b35654
record_format Article
spelling doaj-65d93f8671e240dc910b4abde1b356542020-11-25T02:02:55ZengKeAi Communications Co., Ltd.Journal of Interventional Medicine2096-36022018-05-0112112120A systematic review and meta-analysis of the safety and efficacy of uterine artery embolization vs. surgery for symptomatic uterine fibroidsShiwei Tang0Mingxin Kong1Xinjian Zhao2Jun Chen3Chen Wang4Haibin Zhang5Zhongmin Wang6Department of Interventional Radiology, Weifang People's Hospital, Shandong 261000, ChinaDepartment of Interventional Radiology, Weifang People's Hospital, Shandong 261000, ChinaDepartment of Interventional Radiology, The Frist Affiliated Hospital of the MedicalCollege of Shihezi University, Xinjiang, 832000, ChinaDepartment of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of the Medical College of Shihezi University, Xinjiang 832000, ChinaDepartment of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of the Medical College of Shihezi University, Xinjiang 832000, ChinaDepartment of Interventional Radiology, Weifang People's Hospital, Shandong 261000, ChinaDepartment of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of the Medical College of Shihezi University, Xinjiang 832000, China; Department of Interventional Radiology, Affiliated Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200025, China.; Correspondence: Zhongmin Wang: Department of Vascular And Interventional Radiology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of the MedicalCollege of Shihezi University, Xinjiang 832000, China. Email: wzm0722@hotmail.comABSTRACT: Purpose: The aim of this study was to systematically review the safety and efficacy of uterine artery embolization (UAE) versus surgery for symptomatic uterine fibroids.Materials and Methods: An electronic search of the Cochrane Library, PubMed, Embase and Web of Science databases was conducted from their inception to May 2017 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that assessed UAE versus surgery for the treatment of symptomatic uterine fibroids. The references of the included studies were also retrieved. Two reviewers independently screened the studies based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria, extracted the data, and assessed the methodological quality. The meta-analysis was conducted using RevMan 5.3 software.Results: A total of seven RCTs involving 859 patients were included. The results of the meta-analysis showed a shorter hospital stay and recovery time for UAE as compared to surgery. Surgery was not reported to be better for improving health-related quality of life in any of the included studies. There were no significant differences in patient satisfaction (1-2 and 5 years), and intra-procedural complications or major complications (1 year). However, the rates of minor complications (1 year) and further interventions (2 and 5 years) were significantly higher in patients who underwent UAE rather than surgery. The rates of pregnancy and live births were significantly lower among patients who underwent UAE than surgery.Conclusion: UAE is safe and effective, and has the advantages of shorter hospital stay and recovery time as compared to surgery. However, UAE has the risk of re-intervention, and lower pregnancy and live birth rates. Keywords:: uterine artery embolization, surgery, meta-analysishttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2096360219300262
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Shiwei Tang
Mingxin Kong
Xinjian Zhao
Jun Chen
Chen Wang
Haibin Zhang
Zhongmin Wang
spellingShingle Shiwei Tang
Mingxin Kong
Xinjian Zhao
Jun Chen
Chen Wang
Haibin Zhang
Zhongmin Wang
A systematic review and meta-analysis of the safety and efficacy of uterine artery embolization vs. surgery for symptomatic uterine fibroids
Journal of Interventional Medicine
author_facet Shiwei Tang
Mingxin Kong
Xinjian Zhao
Jun Chen
Chen Wang
Haibin Zhang
Zhongmin Wang
author_sort Shiwei Tang
title A systematic review and meta-analysis of the safety and efficacy of uterine artery embolization vs. surgery for symptomatic uterine fibroids
title_short A systematic review and meta-analysis of the safety and efficacy of uterine artery embolization vs. surgery for symptomatic uterine fibroids
title_full A systematic review and meta-analysis of the safety and efficacy of uterine artery embolization vs. surgery for symptomatic uterine fibroids
title_fullStr A systematic review and meta-analysis of the safety and efficacy of uterine artery embolization vs. surgery for symptomatic uterine fibroids
title_full_unstemmed A systematic review and meta-analysis of the safety and efficacy of uterine artery embolization vs. surgery for symptomatic uterine fibroids
title_sort systematic review and meta-analysis of the safety and efficacy of uterine artery embolization vs. surgery for symptomatic uterine fibroids
publisher KeAi Communications Co., Ltd.
series Journal of Interventional Medicine
issn 2096-3602
publishDate 2018-05-01
description ABSTRACT: Purpose: The aim of this study was to systematically review the safety and efficacy of uterine artery embolization (UAE) versus surgery for symptomatic uterine fibroids.Materials and Methods: An electronic search of the Cochrane Library, PubMed, Embase and Web of Science databases was conducted from their inception to May 2017 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that assessed UAE versus surgery for the treatment of symptomatic uterine fibroids. The references of the included studies were also retrieved. Two reviewers independently screened the studies based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria, extracted the data, and assessed the methodological quality. The meta-analysis was conducted using RevMan 5.3 software.Results: A total of seven RCTs involving 859 patients were included. The results of the meta-analysis showed a shorter hospital stay and recovery time for UAE as compared to surgery. Surgery was not reported to be better for improving health-related quality of life in any of the included studies. There were no significant differences in patient satisfaction (1-2 and 5 years), and intra-procedural complications or major complications (1 year). However, the rates of minor complications (1 year) and further interventions (2 and 5 years) were significantly higher in patients who underwent UAE rather than surgery. The rates of pregnancy and live births were significantly lower among patients who underwent UAE than surgery.Conclusion: UAE is safe and effective, and has the advantages of shorter hospital stay and recovery time as compared to surgery. However, UAE has the risk of re-intervention, and lower pregnancy and live birth rates. Keywords:: uterine artery embolization, surgery, meta-analysis
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2096360219300262
work_keys_str_mv AT shiweitang asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofthesafetyandefficacyofuterinearteryembolizationvssurgeryforsymptomaticuterinefibroids
AT mingxinkong asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofthesafetyandefficacyofuterinearteryembolizationvssurgeryforsymptomaticuterinefibroids
AT xinjianzhao asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofthesafetyandefficacyofuterinearteryembolizationvssurgeryforsymptomaticuterinefibroids
AT junchen asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofthesafetyandefficacyofuterinearteryembolizationvssurgeryforsymptomaticuterinefibroids
AT chenwang asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofthesafetyandefficacyofuterinearteryembolizationvssurgeryforsymptomaticuterinefibroids
AT haibinzhang asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofthesafetyandefficacyofuterinearteryembolizationvssurgeryforsymptomaticuterinefibroids
AT zhongminwang asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofthesafetyandefficacyofuterinearteryembolizationvssurgeryforsymptomaticuterinefibroids
AT shiweitang systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofthesafetyandefficacyofuterinearteryembolizationvssurgeryforsymptomaticuterinefibroids
AT mingxinkong systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofthesafetyandefficacyofuterinearteryembolizationvssurgeryforsymptomaticuterinefibroids
AT xinjianzhao systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofthesafetyandefficacyofuterinearteryembolizationvssurgeryforsymptomaticuterinefibroids
AT junchen systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofthesafetyandefficacyofuterinearteryembolizationvssurgeryforsymptomaticuterinefibroids
AT chenwang systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofthesafetyandefficacyofuterinearteryembolizationvssurgeryforsymptomaticuterinefibroids
AT haibinzhang systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofthesafetyandefficacyofuterinearteryembolizationvssurgeryforsymptomaticuterinefibroids
AT zhongminwang systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofthesafetyandefficacyofuterinearteryembolizationvssurgeryforsymptomaticuterinefibroids
_version_ 1724950659947560960