A systematic review and meta-analysis of the safety and efficacy of uterine artery embolization vs. surgery for symptomatic uterine fibroids
ABSTRACT: Purpose: The aim of this study was to systematically review the safety and efficacy of uterine artery embolization (UAE) versus surgery for symptomatic uterine fibroids.Materials and Methods: An electronic search of the Cochrane Library, PubMed, Embase and Web of Science databases was cond...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
KeAi Communications Co., Ltd.
2018-05-01
|
Series: | Journal of Interventional Medicine |
Online Access: | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2096360219300262 |
id |
doaj-65d93f8671e240dc910b4abde1b35654 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-65d93f8671e240dc910b4abde1b356542020-11-25T02:02:55ZengKeAi Communications Co., Ltd.Journal of Interventional Medicine2096-36022018-05-0112112120A systematic review and meta-analysis of the safety and efficacy of uterine artery embolization vs. surgery for symptomatic uterine fibroidsShiwei Tang0Mingxin Kong1Xinjian Zhao2Jun Chen3Chen Wang4Haibin Zhang5Zhongmin Wang6Department of Interventional Radiology, Weifang People's Hospital, Shandong 261000, ChinaDepartment of Interventional Radiology, Weifang People's Hospital, Shandong 261000, ChinaDepartment of Interventional Radiology, The Frist Affiliated Hospital of the MedicalCollege of Shihezi University, Xinjiang, 832000, ChinaDepartment of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of the Medical College of Shihezi University, Xinjiang 832000, ChinaDepartment of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of the Medical College of Shihezi University, Xinjiang 832000, ChinaDepartment of Interventional Radiology, Weifang People's Hospital, Shandong 261000, ChinaDepartment of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of the Medical College of Shihezi University, Xinjiang 832000, China; Department of Interventional Radiology, Affiliated Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200025, China.; Correspondence: Zhongmin Wang: Department of Vascular And Interventional Radiology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of the MedicalCollege of Shihezi University, Xinjiang 832000, China. Email: wzm0722@hotmail.comABSTRACT: Purpose: The aim of this study was to systematically review the safety and efficacy of uterine artery embolization (UAE) versus surgery for symptomatic uterine fibroids.Materials and Methods: An electronic search of the Cochrane Library, PubMed, Embase and Web of Science databases was conducted from their inception to May 2017 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that assessed UAE versus surgery for the treatment of symptomatic uterine fibroids. The references of the included studies were also retrieved. Two reviewers independently screened the studies based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria, extracted the data, and assessed the methodological quality. The meta-analysis was conducted using RevMan 5.3 software.Results: A total of seven RCTs involving 859 patients were included. The results of the meta-analysis showed a shorter hospital stay and recovery time for UAE as compared to surgery. Surgery was not reported to be better for improving health-related quality of life in any of the included studies. There were no significant differences in patient satisfaction (1-2 and 5 years), and intra-procedural complications or major complications (1 year). However, the rates of minor complications (1 year) and further interventions (2 and 5 years) were significantly higher in patients who underwent UAE rather than surgery. The rates of pregnancy and live births were significantly lower among patients who underwent UAE than surgery.Conclusion: UAE is safe and effective, and has the advantages of shorter hospital stay and recovery time as compared to surgery. However, UAE has the risk of re-intervention, and lower pregnancy and live birth rates. Keywords:: uterine artery embolization, surgery, meta-analysishttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2096360219300262 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Shiwei Tang Mingxin Kong Xinjian Zhao Jun Chen Chen Wang Haibin Zhang Zhongmin Wang |
spellingShingle |
Shiwei Tang Mingxin Kong Xinjian Zhao Jun Chen Chen Wang Haibin Zhang Zhongmin Wang A systematic review and meta-analysis of the safety and efficacy of uterine artery embolization vs. surgery for symptomatic uterine fibroids Journal of Interventional Medicine |
author_facet |
Shiwei Tang Mingxin Kong Xinjian Zhao Jun Chen Chen Wang Haibin Zhang Zhongmin Wang |
author_sort |
Shiwei Tang |
title |
A systematic review and meta-analysis of the safety and efficacy of uterine artery embolization vs. surgery for symptomatic uterine fibroids |
title_short |
A systematic review and meta-analysis of the safety and efficacy of uterine artery embolization vs. surgery for symptomatic uterine fibroids |
title_full |
A systematic review and meta-analysis of the safety and efficacy of uterine artery embolization vs. surgery for symptomatic uterine fibroids |
title_fullStr |
A systematic review and meta-analysis of the safety and efficacy of uterine artery embolization vs. surgery for symptomatic uterine fibroids |
title_full_unstemmed |
A systematic review and meta-analysis of the safety and efficacy of uterine artery embolization vs. surgery for symptomatic uterine fibroids |
title_sort |
systematic review and meta-analysis of the safety and efficacy of uterine artery embolization vs. surgery for symptomatic uterine fibroids |
publisher |
KeAi Communications Co., Ltd. |
series |
Journal of Interventional Medicine |
issn |
2096-3602 |
publishDate |
2018-05-01 |
description |
ABSTRACT: Purpose: The aim of this study was to systematically review the safety and efficacy of uterine artery embolization (UAE) versus surgery for symptomatic uterine fibroids.Materials and Methods: An electronic search of the Cochrane Library, PubMed, Embase and Web of Science databases was conducted from their inception to May 2017 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that assessed UAE versus surgery for the treatment of symptomatic uterine fibroids. The references of the included studies were also retrieved. Two reviewers independently screened the studies based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria, extracted the data, and assessed the methodological quality. The meta-analysis was conducted using RevMan 5.3 software.Results: A total of seven RCTs involving 859 patients were included. The results of the meta-analysis showed a shorter hospital stay and recovery time for UAE as compared to surgery. Surgery was not reported to be better for improving health-related quality of life in any of the included studies. There were no significant differences in patient satisfaction (1-2 and 5 years), and intra-procedural complications or major complications (1 year). However, the rates of minor complications (1 year) and further interventions (2 and 5 years) were significantly higher in patients who underwent UAE rather than surgery. The rates of pregnancy and live births were significantly lower among patients who underwent UAE than surgery.Conclusion: UAE is safe and effective, and has the advantages of shorter hospital stay and recovery time as compared to surgery. However, UAE has the risk of re-intervention, and lower pregnancy and live birth rates. Keywords:: uterine artery embolization, surgery, meta-analysis |
url |
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2096360219300262 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT shiweitang asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofthesafetyandefficacyofuterinearteryembolizationvssurgeryforsymptomaticuterinefibroids AT mingxinkong asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofthesafetyandefficacyofuterinearteryembolizationvssurgeryforsymptomaticuterinefibroids AT xinjianzhao asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofthesafetyandefficacyofuterinearteryembolizationvssurgeryforsymptomaticuterinefibroids AT junchen asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofthesafetyandefficacyofuterinearteryembolizationvssurgeryforsymptomaticuterinefibroids AT chenwang asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofthesafetyandefficacyofuterinearteryembolizationvssurgeryforsymptomaticuterinefibroids AT haibinzhang asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofthesafetyandefficacyofuterinearteryembolizationvssurgeryforsymptomaticuterinefibroids AT zhongminwang asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofthesafetyandefficacyofuterinearteryembolizationvssurgeryforsymptomaticuterinefibroids AT shiweitang systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofthesafetyandefficacyofuterinearteryembolizationvssurgeryforsymptomaticuterinefibroids AT mingxinkong systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofthesafetyandefficacyofuterinearteryembolizationvssurgeryforsymptomaticuterinefibroids AT xinjianzhao systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofthesafetyandefficacyofuterinearteryembolizationvssurgeryforsymptomaticuterinefibroids AT junchen systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofthesafetyandefficacyofuterinearteryembolizationvssurgeryforsymptomaticuterinefibroids AT chenwang systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofthesafetyandefficacyofuterinearteryembolizationvssurgeryforsymptomaticuterinefibroids AT haibinzhang systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofthesafetyandefficacyofuterinearteryembolizationvssurgeryforsymptomaticuterinefibroids AT zhongminwang systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofthesafetyandefficacyofuterinearteryembolizationvssurgeryforsymptomaticuterinefibroids |
_version_ |
1724950659947560960 |