Comparative evaluation of reproductive parameters between the automatic GEDIS cervical insemination method and the traditional in multicolor bristles

• Main Authors: Núñez-Torres Oscar Patricio, Montero-Recalde Mayra Andrea, Rosero-Peñaherrera Marco Antonio, Lozada-Salcedo Euclides Efraín, Pazmiño-Miranda Pilar
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Published: Selva Andina Research Society 2017-04-01
• Series: Journal of the Selva Andina Animal Science
• Subjects: Piglets; pregnancy; seminal reflux; ultrasound; effectiveness.
• Online Access: http://www.scielo.org.bo/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2311-25812017000100006&lng=pt&nrm=iso&tlng=es
• ISSN: 2311-3766; 2311-2581

The research was carried out in Ecuador, in the province of Tungurahua, Cevallos county. A comparison of reproductive parameters between the cervical self insemination method and the traditional one in multiparous sows was performed using 12 sows (hybrid females between the second and fourth calving), dividing In two groups of 6 sows respectively, using the insemination protocol 12h - 24h - 36h. Fresh semen was prepared with long-term diluent + bidistilled water, at a concentration of 3 x 109 spermatozoa/mL in total volume per 100 mL straw. At the time of insemination the amount of seminal reflux was determined and when the Student's T test was applied with paired observations in the results, they statistically reported a significant difference at 5% among the evaluated methods, the calculated T value was 9.50 Which is greater than the T of tables at 5% of 2.57. The duration of each method was determined, results that reported similarity between the two methods (15 min). At 21 days post insemination pregnancy was diagnosed by ultrasound and evaluation of no return of heat, results that reported in both methods 100% effectiveness. Subsequently, at the time of delivery, the number of total born piglets was evaluated, using the Student's T-test with paired observations that statistically there was no significant difference at 5% between the two methods, the calculated T value was 0, 14 which is less than the T of tables at 5% of 2.57. We also determined the weight of piglets at birth, reported by Student's t-test with paired observations that there is a statistically significant difference to 5% among the evaluated methods, the calculated T value was 5.17, which is higher than the T Of tables at 5% of 2.57. As for costs there is no considerable difference.