Effects of Long-Term Exposure to an Electronic Containment System on the Behaviour and Welfare of Domestic Cats.

Free-roaming cats are exposed to a variety of risks, including involvement in road traffic accidents. One way of mitigating these risks is to contain cats, for example using an electronic boundary fence system that delivers an electric 'correction' via a collar if a cat ignores a warning c...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Naïma Kasbaoui, Jonathan Cooper, Daniel S Mills, Oliver Burman
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2016-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5014424?pdf=render
id doaj-65c46e76806b421e98130ba0e53821f6
record_format Article
spelling doaj-65c46e76806b421e98130ba0e53821f62020-11-24T21:37:03ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032016-01-01119e016207310.1371/journal.pone.0162073Effects of Long-Term Exposure to an Electronic Containment System on the Behaviour and Welfare of Domestic Cats.Naïma KasbaouiJonathan CooperDaniel S MillsOliver BurmanFree-roaming cats are exposed to a variety of risks, including involvement in road traffic accidents. One way of mitigating these risks is to contain cats, for example using an electronic boundary fence system that delivers an electric 'correction' via a collar if a cat ignores a warning cue and attempts to cross the boundary. However, concerns have been expressed over the welfare impact of such systems. Our aim was to determine if long-term exposure to an electronic containment system was associated with reduced cat welfare. We compared 46 owned domestic cats: 23 cats that had been contained by an electronic containment system for more than 12 months (AF group); and 23 cats with no containment system that were able to roam more widely (C group). We assessed the cats' behavioural responses and welfare via four behavioural tests (unfamiliar person test; novel object test; sudden noise test; cognitive bias test) and an owner questionnaire. In the unfamiliar person test, C group lip-licked more than the AF group, whilst the AF group looked at, explored and interacted more with the unfamiliar person than C group. In the novel object test, the AF group looked at and explored the object more than C group. No significant differences were found between AF and C groups for the sudden noise or cognitive bias tests. Regarding the questionnaire, C group owners thought their cats showed more irritable behaviour and AF owners thought that their cats toileted inappropriately more often than C owners. Overall, AF cats were less neophobic than C cats and there was no evidence of significant differences between the populations in general affective state. These findings indicate that an electronic boundary fence with clear pre-warning cues does not impair the long term quality of life of cats.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5014424?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Naïma Kasbaoui
Jonathan Cooper
Daniel S Mills
Oliver Burman
spellingShingle Naïma Kasbaoui
Jonathan Cooper
Daniel S Mills
Oliver Burman
Effects of Long-Term Exposure to an Electronic Containment System on the Behaviour and Welfare of Domestic Cats.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Naïma Kasbaoui
Jonathan Cooper
Daniel S Mills
Oliver Burman
author_sort Naïma Kasbaoui
title Effects of Long-Term Exposure to an Electronic Containment System on the Behaviour and Welfare of Domestic Cats.
title_short Effects of Long-Term Exposure to an Electronic Containment System on the Behaviour and Welfare of Domestic Cats.
title_full Effects of Long-Term Exposure to an Electronic Containment System on the Behaviour and Welfare of Domestic Cats.
title_fullStr Effects of Long-Term Exposure to an Electronic Containment System on the Behaviour and Welfare of Domestic Cats.
title_full_unstemmed Effects of Long-Term Exposure to an Electronic Containment System on the Behaviour and Welfare of Domestic Cats.
title_sort effects of long-term exposure to an electronic containment system on the behaviour and welfare of domestic cats.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2016-01-01
description Free-roaming cats are exposed to a variety of risks, including involvement in road traffic accidents. One way of mitigating these risks is to contain cats, for example using an electronic boundary fence system that delivers an electric 'correction' via a collar if a cat ignores a warning cue and attempts to cross the boundary. However, concerns have been expressed over the welfare impact of such systems. Our aim was to determine if long-term exposure to an electronic containment system was associated with reduced cat welfare. We compared 46 owned domestic cats: 23 cats that had been contained by an electronic containment system for more than 12 months (AF group); and 23 cats with no containment system that were able to roam more widely (C group). We assessed the cats' behavioural responses and welfare via four behavioural tests (unfamiliar person test; novel object test; sudden noise test; cognitive bias test) and an owner questionnaire. In the unfamiliar person test, C group lip-licked more than the AF group, whilst the AF group looked at, explored and interacted more with the unfamiliar person than C group. In the novel object test, the AF group looked at and explored the object more than C group. No significant differences were found between AF and C groups for the sudden noise or cognitive bias tests. Regarding the questionnaire, C group owners thought their cats showed more irritable behaviour and AF owners thought that their cats toileted inappropriately more often than C owners. Overall, AF cats were less neophobic than C cats and there was no evidence of significant differences between the populations in general affective state. These findings indicate that an electronic boundary fence with clear pre-warning cues does not impair the long term quality of life of cats.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5014424?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT naimakasbaoui effectsoflongtermexposuretoanelectroniccontainmentsystemonthebehaviourandwelfareofdomesticcats
AT jonathancooper effectsoflongtermexposuretoanelectroniccontainmentsystemonthebehaviourandwelfareofdomesticcats
AT danielsmills effectsoflongtermexposuretoanelectroniccontainmentsystemonthebehaviourandwelfareofdomesticcats
AT oliverburman effectsoflongtermexposuretoanelectroniccontainmentsystemonthebehaviourandwelfareofdomesticcats
_version_ 1725938586644119552