Whether the idea of Single Member Company (SMC), is a device to exploit and to avoid the corporate liability by the Capitalist? A critical Analysis of Section 160 of (Pakistan) Companies Ordinance, 1984

The concept of Single Member Company (the “SMC”) was introduced in Company law of Pakistan in 2002. However, besides having created anomalies within the existing legislation that have already been analyzed by different academics, there remains potential for abuse of the concept of separate legal ent...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Rehmat Ali
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of London 2015-12-01
Series:IALS Student Law Review
Online Access:https://journals.sas.ac.uk/index.php/lawreview/article/view/2239
id doaj-65c25fc222a34c54b47bad1b96e95b35
record_format Article
spelling doaj-65c25fc222a34c54b47bad1b96e95b352020-11-24T21:14:46ZengUniversity of LondonIALS Student Law Review2053-76462015-12-013610.14296/islr.v3i1.22392239Whether the idea of Single Member Company (SMC), is a device to exploit and to avoid the corporate liability by the Capitalist? A critical Analysis of Section 160 of (Pakistan) Companies Ordinance, 1984Rehmat AliThe concept of Single Member Company (the “SMC”) was introduced in Company law of Pakistan in 2002. However, besides having created anomalies within the existing legislation that have already been analyzed by different academics, there remains potential for abuse of the concept of separate legal entity and/or the doctrine of limited liability at the hand of the single member of the SMC. In this view of matter, this article proposes to review the Section 160 of Companies Ordinance, 1984 to argue that there is no provision in the law in Pakistan to effectively place a mechanism of checks and balances so as to reduce the risk of escaping the corporate liability by the SMC in Pakistan. In the same context, this article also dilates upon the inadequacies of SMC legislation in relation to the concept of social, economic and environmental responsibilities of corporate entities.https://journals.sas.ac.uk/index.php/lawreview/article/view/2239
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Rehmat Ali
spellingShingle Rehmat Ali
Whether the idea of Single Member Company (SMC), is a device to exploit and to avoid the corporate liability by the Capitalist? A critical Analysis of Section 160 of (Pakistan) Companies Ordinance, 1984
IALS Student Law Review
author_facet Rehmat Ali
author_sort Rehmat Ali
title Whether the idea of Single Member Company (SMC), is a device to exploit and to avoid the corporate liability by the Capitalist? A critical Analysis of Section 160 of (Pakistan) Companies Ordinance, 1984
title_short Whether the idea of Single Member Company (SMC), is a device to exploit and to avoid the corporate liability by the Capitalist? A critical Analysis of Section 160 of (Pakistan) Companies Ordinance, 1984
title_full Whether the idea of Single Member Company (SMC), is a device to exploit and to avoid the corporate liability by the Capitalist? A critical Analysis of Section 160 of (Pakistan) Companies Ordinance, 1984
title_fullStr Whether the idea of Single Member Company (SMC), is a device to exploit and to avoid the corporate liability by the Capitalist? A critical Analysis of Section 160 of (Pakistan) Companies Ordinance, 1984
title_full_unstemmed Whether the idea of Single Member Company (SMC), is a device to exploit and to avoid the corporate liability by the Capitalist? A critical Analysis of Section 160 of (Pakistan) Companies Ordinance, 1984
title_sort whether the idea of single member company (smc), is a device to exploit and to avoid the corporate liability by the capitalist? a critical analysis of section 160 of (pakistan) companies ordinance, 1984
publisher University of London
series IALS Student Law Review
issn 2053-7646
publishDate 2015-12-01
description The concept of Single Member Company (the “SMC”) was introduced in Company law of Pakistan in 2002. However, besides having created anomalies within the existing legislation that have already been analyzed by different academics, there remains potential for abuse of the concept of separate legal entity and/or the doctrine of limited liability at the hand of the single member of the SMC. In this view of matter, this article proposes to review the Section 160 of Companies Ordinance, 1984 to argue that there is no provision in the law in Pakistan to effectively place a mechanism of checks and balances so as to reduce the risk of escaping the corporate liability by the SMC in Pakistan. In the same context, this article also dilates upon the inadequacies of SMC legislation in relation to the concept of social, economic and environmental responsibilities of corporate entities.
url https://journals.sas.ac.uk/index.php/lawreview/article/view/2239
work_keys_str_mv AT rehmatali whethertheideaofsinglemembercompanysmcisadevicetoexploitandtoavoidthecorporateliabilitybythecapitalistacriticalanalysisofsection160ofpakistancompaniesordinance1984
_version_ 1716746308718428160