Control systems for membrane fusion in the ancestral eukaryote; evolution of tethering complexes and SM proteins

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>In membrane trafficking, the mechanisms ensuring vesicle fusion specificity remain to be fully elucidated. Early models proposed that specificity was encoded entirely by SNARE proteins; more recent models include contributions from R...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Coulson Richard MR, Dacks Joel B, Koumandou V Lila, Field Mark C
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2007-02-01
Series:BMC Evolutionary Biology
Online Access:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2148/7/29
id doaj-65b25d73d55d4a37bd8ef931ee61326d
record_format Article
spelling doaj-65b25d73d55d4a37bd8ef931ee61326d2021-09-02T14:41:04ZengBMCBMC Evolutionary Biology1471-21482007-02-01712910.1186/1471-2148-7-29Control systems for membrane fusion in the ancestral eukaryote; evolution of tethering complexes and SM proteinsCoulson Richard MRDacks Joel BKoumandou V LilaField Mark C<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>In membrane trafficking, the mechanisms ensuring vesicle fusion specificity remain to be fully elucidated. Early models proposed that specificity was encoded entirely by SNARE proteins; more recent models include contributions from Rab proteins, Syntaxin-binding (SM) proteins and tethering factors. Most information on membrane trafficking derives from an evolutionarily narrow sampling of model organisms. However, considering factors from a wider diversity of eukaryotes can provide both functional information on core systems and insight into the evolutionary history of the trafficking machinery. For example, the major Qa/syntaxin SNARE families are present in most eukaryotic genomes and likely each evolved <it>via </it>gene duplication from a single ancestral syntaxin before the existing eukaryotic groups diversified. This pattern is also likely for Rabs and various other components of the membrane trafficking machinery.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>We performed comparative genomic and phylogenetic analyses, when relevant, on the SM proteins and components of the tethering complexes, both thought to contribute to vesicle fusion specificity. Despite evidence suggestive of secondary losses amongst many lineages, the tethering complexes are well represented across the eukaryotes, suggesting an origin predating the radiation of eukaryotic lineages. Further, whilst we detect distant sequence relations between GARP, COG, exocyst and DSL1 components, these similarities most likely reflect convergent evolution of similar secondary structural elements. No similarity is found between the TRAPP and HOPS complexes and the other tethering factors. Overall, our data favour independent origins for the various tethering complexes. The taxa examined possess at least one homologue of each of the four SM protein families; since the four monophyletic families each encompass a wide diversity of eukaryotes, the SM protein families very likely evolved before the last common eukaryotic ancestor (LCEA).</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>These data further support a highly complex LCEA and indicate that the basic architecture of the trafficking system is remarkably conserved and ancient, with the SM proteins and tethering factors having originated very early in eukaryotic evolution. However, the independent origin of the tethering complexes suggests a novel pattern for increasing complexity in the membrane trafficking system, in addition to the pattern of paralogous machinery elaboration seen thus far.</p> http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2148/7/29
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Coulson Richard MR
Dacks Joel B
Koumandou V Lila
Field Mark C
spellingShingle Coulson Richard MR
Dacks Joel B
Koumandou V Lila
Field Mark C
Control systems for membrane fusion in the ancestral eukaryote; evolution of tethering complexes and SM proteins
BMC Evolutionary Biology
author_facet Coulson Richard MR
Dacks Joel B
Koumandou V Lila
Field Mark C
author_sort Coulson Richard MR
title Control systems for membrane fusion in the ancestral eukaryote; evolution of tethering complexes and SM proteins
title_short Control systems for membrane fusion in the ancestral eukaryote; evolution of tethering complexes and SM proteins
title_full Control systems for membrane fusion in the ancestral eukaryote; evolution of tethering complexes and SM proteins
title_fullStr Control systems for membrane fusion in the ancestral eukaryote; evolution of tethering complexes and SM proteins
title_full_unstemmed Control systems for membrane fusion in the ancestral eukaryote; evolution of tethering complexes and SM proteins
title_sort control systems for membrane fusion in the ancestral eukaryote; evolution of tethering complexes and sm proteins
publisher BMC
series BMC Evolutionary Biology
issn 1471-2148
publishDate 2007-02-01
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>In membrane trafficking, the mechanisms ensuring vesicle fusion specificity remain to be fully elucidated. Early models proposed that specificity was encoded entirely by SNARE proteins; more recent models include contributions from Rab proteins, Syntaxin-binding (SM) proteins and tethering factors. Most information on membrane trafficking derives from an evolutionarily narrow sampling of model organisms. However, considering factors from a wider diversity of eukaryotes can provide both functional information on core systems and insight into the evolutionary history of the trafficking machinery. For example, the major Qa/syntaxin SNARE families are present in most eukaryotic genomes and likely each evolved <it>via </it>gene duplication from a single ancestral syntaxin before the existing eukaryotic groups diversified. This pattern is also likely for Rabs and various other components of the membrane trafficking machinery.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>We performed comparative genomic and phylogenetic analyses, when relevant, on the SM proteins and components of the tethering complexes, both thought to contribute to vesicle fusion specificity. Despite evidence suggestive of secondary losses amongst many lineages, the tethering complexes are well represented across the eukaryotes, suggesting an origin predating the radiation of eukaryotic lineages. Further, whilst we detect distant sequence relations between GARP, COG, exocyst and DSL1 components, these similarities most likely reflect convergent evolution of similar secondary structural elements. No similarity is found between the TRAPP and HOPS complexes and the other tethering factors. Overall, our data favour independent origins for the various tethering complexes. The taxa examined possess at least one homologue of each of the four SM protein families; since the four monophyletic families each encompass a wide diversity of eukaryotes, the SM protein families very likely evolved before the last common eukaryotic ancestor (LCEA).</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>These data further support a highly complex LCEA and indicate that the basic architecture of the trafficking system is remarkably conserved and ancient, with the SM proteins and tethering factors having originated very early in eukaryotic evolution. However, the independent origin of the tethering complexes suggests a novel pattern for increasing complexity in the membrane trafficking system, in addition to the pattern of paralogous machinery elaboration seen thus far.</p>
url http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2148/7/29
work_keys_str_mv AT coulsonrichardmr controlsystemsformembranefusionintheancestraleukaryoteevolutionoftetheringcomplexesandsmproteins
AT dacksjoelb controlsystemsformembranefusionintheancestraleukaryoteevolutionoftetheringcomplexesandsmproteins
AT koumandouvlila controlsystemsformembranefusionintheancestraleukaryoteevolutionoftetheringcomplexesandsmproteins
AT fieldmarkc controlsystemsformembranefusionintheancestraleukaryoteevolutionoftetheringcomplexesandsmproteins
_version_ 1721174328530173952