Nitrogen losses from grass ley after slurry application surface broadcasting vs. injection

As the livestock numbers on Finnish dairy farms have increased and most fields on dairy farms are under grass, it has become common to spread cattle slurry over grasslands. To estimate environmental effects of recurrent slurry applications, a 5-year field study was performed to compare nitrogen (N)...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: J. UUSI-KÄMPPÄ, P.K. MATTILA
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Scientific Agricultural Society of Finland 2008-12-01
Series:Agricultural and Food Science
Online Access:https://journal.fi/afs/article/view/5999
id doaj-659151fd82e54e39ba0dce18e7c53830
record_format Article
spelling doaj-659151fd82e54e39ba0dce18e7c538302020-11-24T22:30:43ZengScientific Agricultural Society of FinlandAgricultural and Food Science1459-60671795-18952008-12-01194 Nitrogen losses from grass ley after slurry application surface broadcasting vs. injectionJ. UUSI-KÄMPPÄP.K. MATTILAAs the livestock numbers on Finnish dairy farms have increased and most fields on dairy farms are under grass, it has become common to spread cattle slurry over grasslands. To estimate environmental effects of recurrent slurry applications, a 5-year field study was performed to compare nitrogen (N) losses to water and ammonia losses to air by volatilization, when cattle slurry was either surface broadcast or injected into clay soil after grass cuttings. Slurry was spread on the grass in summer (19961997) or both in summer and autumn (19982000). Biomass N uptake before grass harvesting and amount of soil mineral N in spring and autumn were measured and field N balances were calculated. Despite cool weather, up to one third of the ammonium N of broadcast slurries was lost through ammonia volatilization after application in autumn, but injection effectively prevented losses. The mean surface runoff losses of total N were negligible (0.34.6 kg ha-1 yr-1) with the highest loss of 13 kg ha-1 yr-1 measured after slurry broadcasting to wet soil in autumn and followed with heavy rains. A substantial part (2455%) of the applied mineral N was not recovered by the foregoing measurements.;https://journal.fi/afs/article/view/5999
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author J. UUSI-KÄMPPÄ
P.K. MATTILA
spellingShingle J. UUSI-KÄMPPÄ
P.K. MATTILA
Nitrogen losses from grass ley after slurry application surface broadcasting vs. injection
Agricultural and Food Science
author_facet J. UUSI-KÄMPPÄ
P.K. MATTILA
author_sort J. UUSI-KÄMPPÄ
title Nitrogen losses from grass ley after slurry application surface broadcasting vs. injection
title_short Nitrogen losses from grass ley after slurry application surface broadcasting vs. injection
title_full Nitrogen losses from grass ley after slurry application surface broadcasting vs. injection
title_fullStr Nitrogen losses from grass ley after slurry application surface broadcasting vs. injection
title_full_unstemmed Nitrogen losses from grass ley after slurry application surface broadcasting vs. injection
title_sort nitrogen losses from grass ley after slurry application surface broadcasting vs. injection
publisher Scientific Agricultural Society of Finland
series Agricultural and Food Science
issn 1459-6067
1795-1895
publishDate 2008-12-01
description As the livestock numbers on Finnish dairy farms have increased and most fields on dairy farms are under grass, it has become common to spread cattle slurry over grasslands. To estimate environmental effects of recurrent slurry applications, a 5-year field study was performed to compare nitrogen (N) losses to water and ammonia losses to air by volatilization, when cattle slurry was either surface broadcast or injected into clay soil after grass cuttings. Slurry was spread on the grass in summer (19961997) or both in summer and autumn (19982000). Biomass N uptake before grass harvesting and amount of soil mineral N in spring and autumn were measured and field N balances were calculated. Despite cool weather, up to one third of the ammonium N of broadcast slurries was lost through ammonia volatilization after application in autumn, but injection effectively prevented losses. The mean surface runoff losses of total N were negligible (0.34.6 kg ha-1 yr-1) with the highest loss of 13 kg ha-1 yr-1 measured after slurry broadcasting to wet soil in autumn and followed with heavy rains. A substantial part (2455%) of the applied mineral N was not recovered by the foregoing measurements.;
url https://journal.fi/afs/article/view/5999
work_keys_str_mv AT juusikamppa nitrogenlossesfromgrassleyafterslurryapplicationsurfacebroadcastingvsinjection
AT pkmattila nitrogenlossesfromgrassleyafterslurryapplicationsurfacebroadcastingvsinjection
_version_ 1725739644153233408