How effective are biodiversity conservation payments in Mexico?
We assess the additional forest cover protected by 13 rural communities located in the southern state of Chiapas, Mexico, as a result of the economic incentives received through the country's national program of payments for biodiversity conservation. We use spatially explicit data at the intra...
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2015-01-01
|
Series: | PLoS ONE |
Online Access: | http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4373862?pdf=render |
id |
doaj-658df769a5a849c08730253b1e42f6d0 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-658df769a5a849c08730253b1e42f6d02020-11-25T00:50:48ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032015-01-01103e011988110.1371/journal.pone.0119881How effective are biodiversity conservation payments in Mexico?Sébastien CostedoatEsteve CorberaDriss Ezzine-de-BlasJordi Honey-RosésKathy BaylisMiguel Angel Castillo-SantiagoWe assess the additional forest cover protected by 13 rural communities located in the southern state of Chiapas, Mexico, as a result of the economic incentives received through the country's national program of payments for biodiversity conservation. We use spatially explicit data at the intra-community level to define a credible counterfactual of conservation outcomes. We use covariate-matching specifications associated with spatially explicit variables and difference-in-difference estimators to determine the treatment effect. We estimate that the additional conservation represents between 12 and 14.7 percent of forest area enrolled in the program in comparison to control areas. Despite this high degree of additionality, we also observe lack of compliance in some plots participating in the PES program. This lack of compliance casts doubt on the ability of payments alone to guarantee long-term additionality in context of high deforestation rates, even with an augmented program budget or extension of participation to communities not yet enrolled.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4373862?pdf=render |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Sébastien Costedoat Esteve Corbera Driss Ezzine-de-Blas Jordi Honey-Rosés Kathy Baylis Miguel Angel Castillo-Santiago |
spellingShingle |
Sébastien Costedoat Esteve Corbera Driss Ezzine-de-Blas Jordi Honey-Rosés Kathy Baylis Miguel Angel Castillo-Santiago How effective are biodiversity conservation payments in Mexico? PLoS ONE |
author_facet |
Sébastien Costedoat Esteve Corbera Driss Ezzine-de-Blas Jordi Honey-Rosés Kathy Baylis Miguel Angel Castillo-Santiago |
author_sort |
Sébastien Costedoat |
title |
How effective are biodiversity conservation payments in Mexico? |
title_short |
How effective are biodiversity conservation payments in Mexico? |
title_full |
How effective are biodiversity conservation payments in Mexico? |
title_fullStr |
How effective are biodiversity conservation payments in Mexico? |
title_full_unstemmed |
How effective are biodiversity conservation payments in Mexico? |
title_sort |
how effective are biodiversity conservation payments in mexico? |
publisher |
Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
series |
PLoS ONE |
issn |
1932-6203 |
publishDate |
2015-01-01 |
description |
We assess the additional forest cover protected by 13 rural communities located in the southern state of Chiapas, Mexico, as a result of the economic incentives received through the country's national program of payments for biodiversity conservation. We use spatially explicit data at the intra-community level to define a credible counterfactual of conservation outcomes. We use covariate-matching specifications associated with spatially explicit variables and difference-in-difference estimators to determine the treatment effect. We estimate that the additional conservation represents between 12 and 14.7 percent of forest area enrolled in the program in comparison to control areas. Despite this high degree of additionality, we also observe lack of compliance in some plots participating in the PES program. This lack of compliance casts doubt on the ability of payments alone to guarantee long-term additionality in context of high deforestation rates, even with an augmented program budget or extension of participation to communities not yet enrolled. |
url |
http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4373862?pdf=render |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT sebastiencostedoat howeffectivearebiodiversityconservationpaymentsinmexico AT estevecorbera howeffectivearebiodiversityconservationpaymentsinmexico AT drissezzinedeblas howeffectivearebiodiversityconservationpaymentsinmexico AT jordihoneyroses howeffectivearebiodiversityconservationpaymentsinmexico AT kathybaylis howeffectivearebiodiversityconservationpaymentsinmexico AT miguelangelcastillosantiago howeffectivearebiodiversityconservationpaymentsinmexico |
_version_ |
1725246412749275136 |