How effective are biodiversity conservation payments in Mexico?

We assess the additional forest cover protected by 13 rural communities located in the southern state of Chiapas, Mexico, as a result of the economic incentives received through the country's national program of payments for biodiversity conservation. We use spatially explicit data at the intra...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sébastien Costedoat, Esteve Corbera, Driss Ezzine-de-Blas, Jordi Honey-Rosés, Kathy Baylis, Miguel Angel Castillo-Santiago
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2015-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4373862?pdf=render
id doaj-658df769a5a849c08730253b1e42f6d0
record_format Article
spelling doaj-658df769a5a849c08730253b1e42f6d02020-11-25T00:50:48ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032015-01-01103e011988110.1371/journal.pone.0119881How effective are biodiversity conservation payments in Mexico?Sébastien CostedoatEsteve CorberaDriss Ezzine-de-BlasJordi Honey-RosésKathy BaylisMiguel Angel Castillo-SantiagoWe assess the additional forest cover protected by 13 rural communities located in the southern state of Chiapas, Mexico, as a result of the economic incentives received through the country's national program of payments for biodiversity conservation. We use spatially explicit data at the intra-community level to define a credible counterfactual of conservation outcomes. We use covariate-matching specifications associated with spatially explicit variables and difference-in-difference estimators to determine the treatment effect. We estimate that the additional conservation represents between 12 and 14.7 percent of forest area enrolled in the program in comparison to control areas. Despite this high degree of additionality, we also observe lack of compliance in some plots participating in the PES program. This lack of compliance casts doubt on the ability of payments alone to guarantee long-term additionality in context of high deforestation rates, even with an augmented program budget or extension of participation to communities not yet enrolled.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4373862?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Sébastien Costedoat
Esteve Corbera
Driss Ezzine-de-Blas
Jordi Honey-Rosés
Kathy Baylis
Miguel Angel Castillo-Santiago
spellingShingle Sébastien Costedoat
Esteve Corbera
Driss Ezzine-de-Blas
Jordi Honey-Rosés
Kathy Baylis
Miguel Angel Castillo-Santiago
How effective are biodiversity conservation payments in Mexico?
PLoS ONE
author_facet Sébastien Costedoat
Esteve Corbera
Driss Ezzine-de-Blas
Jordi Honey-Rosés
Kathy Baylis
Miguel Angel Castillo-Santiago
author_sort Sébastien Costedoat
title How effective are biodiversity conservation payments in Mexico?
title_short How effective are biodiversity conservation payments in Mexico?
title_full How effective are biodiversity conservation payments in Mexico?
title_fullStr How effective are biodiversity conservation payments in Mexico?
title_full_unstemmed How effective are biodiversity conservation payments in Mexico?
title_sort how effective are biodiversity conservation payments in mexico?
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2015-01-01
description We assess the additional forest cover protected by 13 rural communities located in the southern state of Chiapas, Mexico, as a result of the economic incentives received through the country's national program of payments for biodiversity conservation. We use spatially explicit data at the intra-community level to define a credible counterfactual of conservation outcomes. We use covariate-matching specifications associated with spatially explicit variables and difference-in-difference estimators to determine the treatment effect. We estimate that the additional conservation represents between 12 and 14.7 percent of forest area enrolled in the program in comparison to control areas. Despite this high degree of additionality, we also observe lack of compliance in some plots participating in the PES program. This lack of compliance casts doubt on the ability of payments alone to guarantee long-term additionality in context of high deforestation rates, even with an augmented program budget or extension of participation to communities not yet enrolled.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4373862?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT sebastiencostedoat howeffectivearebiodiversityconservationpaymentsinmexico
AT estevecorbera howeffectivearebiodiversityconservationpaymentsinmexico
AT drissezzinedeblas howeffectivearebiodiversityconservationpaymentsinmexico
AT jordihoneyroses howeffectivearebiodiversityconservationpaymentsinmexico
AT kathybaylis howeffectivearebiodiversityconservationpaymentsinmexico
AT miguelangelcastillosantiago howeffectivearebiodiversityconservationpaymentsinmexico
_version_ 1725246412749275136