Contested technology: Social scientific perspectives of behaviour-based insurance
In this review, I analyse how ‘behaviour-based personalisation’ in insurance – that is, insurers’ increased interest in tracking and manipulating insureds’ behaviour with, for instance, wearable devices – has been approached in recent social scientific literature. In the review, I focus on two strea...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
SAGE Publishing
2020-08-01
|
Series: | Big Data & Society |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951720942536 |
id |
doaj-65896f8f619646f89de7180ba480dbfe |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-65896f8f619646f89de7180ba480dbfe2020-11-25T03:47:07ZengSAGE PublishingBig Data & Society2053-95172020-08-01710.1177/2053951720942536Contested technology: Social scientific perspectives of behaviour-based insuranceMaiju TanninenIn this review, I analyse how ‘behaviour-based personalisation’ in insurance – that is, insurers’ increased interest in tracking and manipulating insureds’ behaviour with, for instance, wearable devices – has been approached in recent social scientific literature. In the review, I focus on two streams of literature, critical data studies and the sociology of insurance, discussing the new (i.e. health and life) insurance schemes that utilise sensor-generated and digital data. The aim of this review is to compare these two approaches and to analyse what kinds of understandings, methodologies and theoretical perspectives they apply to so-called ‘behaviour-based insurance’. The critical data studies literature emphasises the exploitative aspects of these new technologies and mobilises behaviour-based insurance to exemplify the negative outcomes of digital health. Scholars from the field of the sociology of insurance empirically analyse the practices of behavioural-based personalisation and study how regulating and ‘doing’ insurance affect attempts to personalise it. I highlight the importance of approaching insurance as a specific financial technology and argue that more research is needed to understand the practices of developing behaviour-based insurance schemes and the insureds’ experiences.https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951720942536 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Maiju Tanninen |
spellingShingle |
Maiju Tanninen Contested technology: Social scientific perspectives of behaviour-based insurance Big Data & Society |
author_facet |
Maiju Tanninen |
author_sort |
Maiju Tanninen |
title |
Contested technology: Social scientific perspectives of behaviour-based insurance |
title_short |
Contested technology: Social scientific perspectives of behaviour-based insurance |
title_full |
Contested technology: Social scientific perspectives of behaviour-based insurance |
title_fullStr |
Contested technology: Social scientific perspectives of behaviour-based insurance |
title_full_unstemmed |
Contested technology: Social scientific perspectives of behaviour-based insurance |
title_sort |
contested technology: social scientific perspectives of behaviour-based insurance |
publisher |
SAGE Publishing |
series |
Big Data & Society |
issn |
2053-9517 |
publishDate |
2020-08-01 |
description |
In this review, I analyse how ‘behaviour-based personalisation’ in insurance – that is, insurers’ increased interest in tracking and manipulating insureds’ behaviour with, for instance, wearable devices – has been approached in recent social scientific literature. In the review, I focus on two streams of literature, critical data studies and the sociology of insurance, discussing the new (i.e. health and life) insurance schemes that utilise sensor-generated and digital data. The aim of this review is to compare these two approaches and to analyse what kinds of understandings, methodologies and theoretical perspectives they apply to so-called ‘behaviour-based insurance’. The critical data studies literature emphasises the exploitative aspects of these new technologies and mobilises behaviour-based insurance to exemplify the negative outcomes of digital health. Scholars from the field of the sociology of insurance empirically analyse the practices of behavioural-based personalisation and study how regulating and ‘doing’ insurance affect attempts to personalise it. I highlight the importance of approaching insurance as a specific financial technology and argue that more research is needed to understand the practices of developing behaviour-based insurance schemes and the insureds’ experiences. |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951720942536 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT maijutanninen contestedtechnologysocialscientificperspectivesofbehaviourbasedinsurance |
_version_ |
1724503352400674816 |