Matching the Material of Transparent Objects: The Role of Background Distortions

It has been proposed that the visual system is able to estimate the refractive index of thick transparent objects from background distortions caused by them. More specifically, it was hypothesized that this is done based on a mid-level cue, the distortion field, whose computation from the input requ...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Nick Schlüter, Franz Faul
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2016-09-01
Series:i-Perception
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/2041669516669616
id doaj-6571c2697224476aaed1631fca0bc994
record_format Article
spelling doaj-6571c2697224476aaed1631fca0bc9942020-11-25T03:38:40ZengSAGE Publishingi-Perception2041-66952016-09-01710.1177/2041669516669616Matching the Material of Transparent Objects: The Role of Background DistortionsNick SchlüterFranz FaulIt has been proposed that the visual system is able to estimate the refractive index of thick transparent objects from background distortions caused by them. More specifically, it was hypothesized that this is done based on a mid-level cue, the distortion field, whose computation from the input requires comparing the part of the background seen through the object with the part visible in plain view. We test two predictions derived from this hypothesis: (a) scene variables that do not change the distortion field, for instance, the density of the background texture, should not systematically influence the subjects’ settings in a material matching task. (b) The uncertainty of the estimates should increase sharply, if the part of the background texture in plain view is removed. Our results are not compatible with these two predictions but are completely in line with the alternative interpretation that the subjects maximized the similarity of the distorted background textures on the image level. Additional results indicate that subjects can take relations between the distorted and the undistorted background into account if this is encouraged by the experimental design, but they do this in a simplistic way that is inappropriate to estimate the refractive index.https://doi.org/10.1177/2041669516669616
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Nick Schlüter
Franz Faul
spellingShingle Nick Schlüter
Franz Faul
Matching the Material of Transparent Objects: The Role of Background Distortions
i-Perception
author_facet Nick Schlüter
Franz Faul
author_sort Nick Schlüter
title Matching the Material of Transparent Objects: The Role of Background Distortions
title_short Matching the Material of Transparent Objects: The Role of Background Distortions
title_full Matching the Material of Transparent Objects: The Role of Background Distortions
title_fullStr Matching the Material of Transparent Objects: The Role of Background Distortions
title_full_unstemmed Matching the Material of Transparent Objects: The Role of Background Distortions
title_sort matching the material of transparent objects: the role of background distortions
publisher SAGE Publishing
series i-Perception
issn 2041-6695
publishDate 2016-09-01
description It has been proposed that the visual system is able to estimate the refractive index of thick transparent objects from background distortions caused by them. More specifically, it was hypothesized that this is done based on a mid-level cue, the distortion field, whose computation from the input requires comparing the part of the background seen through the object with the part visible in plain view. We test two predictions derived from this hypothesis: (a) scene variables that do not change the distortion field, for instance, the density of the background texture, should not systematically influence the subjects’ settings in a material matching task. (b) The uncertainty of the estimates should increase sharply, if the part of the background texture in plain view is removed. Our results are not compatible with these two predictions but are completely in line with the alternative interpretation that the subjects maximized the similarity of the distorted background textures on the image level. Additional results indicate that subjects can take relations between the distorted and the undistorted background into account if this is encouraged by the experimental design, but they do this in a simplistic way that is inappropriate to estimate the refractive index.
url https://doi.org/10.1177/2041669516669616
work_keys_str_mv AT nickschluter matchingthematerialoftransparentobjectstheroleofbackgrounddistortions
AT franzfaul matchingthematerialoftransparentobjectstheroleofbackgrounddistortions
_version_ 1724541189048238080