Optimal forest management with carbon benefits included

In this paper, we analyse how optimal forest management of even aged Norway spruce changes when economic values are placed on carbon fixation, release, and saved greenhouse gas emissions from using wood instead of more energy intensive materials or fossil fuels. The analyses are done...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Raymer, Ann, Gobakken, Terje, Solberg, Birger
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Finnish Society of Forest Science 2011-01-01
Series:Silva Fennica
Online Access:https://www.silvafennica.fi/article/109
id doaj-656ac7d9a992433ca7fb06ad38455b43
record_format Article
spelling doaj-656ac7d9a992433ca7fb06ad38455b432020-11-25T01:44:06ZengFinnish Society of Forest ScienceSilva Fennica2242-40752011-01-0145310.14214/sf.109Optimal forest management with carbon benefits includedRaymer, AnnGobakken, TerjeSolberg, Birger In this paper, we analyse how optimal forest management of even aged Norway spruce changes when economic values are placed on carbon fixation, release, and saved greenhouse gas emissions from using wood instead of more energy intensive materials or fossil fuels. The analyses are done for three different site qualities in Norway, assuming present climate and with a range of CO prices and real rates of return. Compared to current recommended management, the optimal number of plants per ha and harvest age are considerably higher when carbon benefits are included, and increase with increasing price on CO. Furthermore, planting becomes more favourable compared to natural regeneration. At the medium site quality, assuming 2% p.a. real rate of return and 20 euros per ton CO, optimal planting density increases from 1500 per ha to 3000 per ha. Optimal harvest age increases from 90 to 140 years. Including saved greenhouse gas emissions when wood is used instead of more energy intensive materials or fossil fuels, i.e. substitution effects, does not affect optimal planting density much, but implies harvesting up to 20 years earlier. The value of the forest area increases with increasing price on CO, and most of the income is from carbon. By using the current recommended management in calculations of carbon benefit, our results indicate that the forestâs potential to provide this environmental good is underestimated. The study includes many uncertain factors. Highest uncertainty is related to the accuracy of the forest growth and mortality functions at high stand ages and densities, and that albedo effects and future climate changes are not considered. As such, the results should be viewed as exploratory and not normative.2222https://www.silvafennica.fi/article/109
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Raymer, Ann
Gobakken, Terje
Solberg, Birger
spellingShingle Raymer, Ann
Gobakken, Terje
Solberg, Birger
Optimal forest management with carbon benefits included
Silva Fennica
author_facet Raymer, Ann
Gobakken, Terje
Solberg, Birger
author_sort Raymer, Ann
title Optimal forest management with carbon benefits included
title_short Optimal forest management with carbon benefits included
title_full Optimal forest management with carbon benefits included
title_fullStr Optimal forest management with carbon benefits included
title_full_unstemmed Optimal forest management with carbon benefits included
title_sort optimal forest management with carbon benefits included
publisher Finnish Society of Forest Science
series Silva Fennica
issn 2242-4075
publishDate 2011-01-01
description In this paper, we analyse how optimal forest management of even aged Norway spruce changes when economic values are placed on carbon fixation, release, and saved greenhouse gas emissions from using wood instead of more energy intensive materials or fossil fuels. The analyses are done for three different site qualities in Norway, assuming present climate and with a range of CO prices and real rates of return. Compared to current recommended management, the optimal number of plants per ha and harvest age are considerably higher when carbon benefits are included, and increase with increasing price on CO. Furthermore, planting becomes more favourable compared to natural regeneration. At the medium site quality, assuming 2% p.a. real rate of return and 20 euros per ton CO, optimal planting density increases from 1500 per ha to 3000 per ha. Optimal harvest age increases from 90 to 140 years. Including saved greenhouse gas emissions when wood is used instead of more energy intensive materials or fossil fuels, i.e. substitution effects, does not affect optimal planting density much, but implies harvesting up to 20 years earlier. The value of the forest area increases with increasing price on CO, and most of the income is from carbon. By using the current recommended management in calculations of carbon benefit, our results indicate that the forestâs potential to provide this environmental good is underestimated. The study includes many uncertain factors. Highest uncertainty is related to the accuracy of the forest growth and mortality functions at high stand ages and densities, and that albedo effects and future climate changes are not considered. As such, the results should be viewed as exploratory and not normative.2222
url https://www.silvafennica.fi/article/109
work_keys_str_mv AT raymerann optimalforestmanagementwithcarbonbenefitsincluded
AT gobakkenterje optimalforestmanagementwithcarbonbenefitsincluded
AT solbergbirger optimalforestmanagementwithcarbonbenefitsincluded
_version_ 1725029976503222272