How do cemented short Exeter stems perform compared with standard-length Exeter stems? The experience of the New Zealand National Joint Registry

• Main Authors: Michael C. Wyatt, FRACS, Vaughan Poutawera, FRACS, David C. Kieser, PhD, FRACS, Chris M.A. Frampton, PhD, Gary J. Hooper, MD, FRACS
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Published: Elsevier 2020-03-01
• Series: Arthroplasty Today
• Online Access: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352344120300030

Background: The standard Exeter (Stryker) cemented stem is 150 mm long with standard offsets ranging from 37.5 mm to 56 mm. Exeter short stems of 125 mm are also available in the offsets of 37.5 mm, 44 mm, and 50 mm. In addition, smaller (125 mm or shorter) Exeter cemented stems with offsets of 35.5 mm or less are available. The aim of this study was to examine the New Zealand Joint Registry (NZJR) comparing medium-term survival rates and functional outcomes of standard-length stems with Exeter short stems of various offsets in patients undergoing primary total hip replacement. Methods: Using the NZJR, we compared the results of 3 separate groups of patients with Exeter stems. Patients with standard 150 mm length Exeter stems (Standard) were compared with patients with Exeter 125 mm stems with regular 37.5 mm, 44 mm, and 50 mm offsets (Short 37+) and Exeter 125 mm stems with offsets of 35.5 mm and below (Short 37−). Demographic data, preoperative diagnosis, patient-reported outcome measures, and reasons for revision were compared between groups. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Cox multivariate regression analysis were used to examine implant survival and the influence of stem group on revision rates adjusting for gender, age, diagnosis, and surgical approach. Results: There were 43,427 Exeter cemented stems in the NZJR between January 1, 1999 and 31, May 2018; 41,629 Standard, 657 Short 37+, and 1501 Short 37−. In all 3 groups, the posterior surgical approach was preferred (Standard, 76.1%; Short 37+, 94.6%; Short 37−, 76.6%; P < .001). In the Short 37− group, 94.1% were female, while in the other 2 groups, there was an equal gender ratio (P < .001). The Short 37- group was also significantly younger than the other 2 groups with 41.6% younger than 65 years compared with Short 37+ (37.2%) and Standard groups (36.9%) (P < .01). There was no difference in American Society of Anesthesiologists grade between groups. Body mass index (BMI) was significantly higher in both the Short 37− and Short 37 + groups compared with the Standard group (Standard BMI, 28.71; SD 5.72; Short 37+ BMI, 29.69; SD, 6.67; Short 37− BMI, 29.09; SD 7.07; P < .001). The all-cause revision rate for standard stems was 0.55/100 component years (cy) (95% CI: 0.52 to 0.58). The Short 37− group had a higher rate of revision compared with the Standard group (hazard ratio 1.6; 95% CI: 1.3 to 1.98; P < .001), while the Short 37+ group had a hazard ratio of 0.84 (95% CI: 0.38 to 1.88; P = .674) compared with the Standard group. Cox regression analysis controlling for age, gender, diagnosis of OA, and surgical approach did not affect these findings. However, no clinically meaningful difference between Oxford hip scores was observed. Conclusions: There was a significant difference in revision rates for aseptic loosening with standard-length Exeter stems having a lower revision rate than short Exeter stems with offsets 35.5 mm or less. The Short 37+ groups, despite comprising relatively small numbers, performed similarly to the Standard stem group. Keywords: Exeter, Short stem, Registry, Offset, Survivorship, Function