Technical Factors Affecting Ultrasound Breast Tumor Size as Correlated with Pathological Type

<i>Background and Objectives:</i> Accurate breast tumor sizing is very important in treatment planning; as a result, ultrasound (US) plays an important role in diagnosing breast masses, due to its non-magnified image and its availability. The continuous change in the disease pathogenesis...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Eman Ahmed Shawky Sabek, Hala Taha Salem
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2019-10-01
Series:Medicina
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1010-660X/55/11/713
id doaj-654f84113be14bedac4f42db9cdd4646
record_format Article
spelling doaj-654f84113be14bedac4f42db9cdd46462020-11-25T02:42:44ZengMDPI AGMedicina1010-660X2019-10-01551171310.3390/medicina55110713medicina55110713Technical Factors Affecting Ultrasound Breast Tumor Size as Correlated with Pathological TypeEman Ahmed Shawky Sabek0Hala Taha Salem1Health Radiation Research Department, National Center of Radiation Research and Technology, Atomic Energy Authority, 3 Ahmed El-zomor street, Nasr City, P.O. BOX 9621, Cairo 11765, EgyptHealth Radiation Research Department, National Center of Radiation Research and Technology, Atomic Energy Authority, 3 Ahmed El-zomor street, Nasr City, P.O. BOX 9621, Cairo 11765, Egypt<i>Background and Objectives:</i> Accurate breast tumor sizing is very important in treatment planning; as a result, ultrasound (US) plays an important role in diagnosing breast masses, due to its non-magnified image and its availability. The continuous change in the disease pathogenesis of breast cancer and tremendous advances in US imaging technology require the continuous evaluation of this imaging modality. In this study, our aim was to determine the accuracy of US in measuring the size of breast mass, and if there is an influence of the different pathological types on this accuracy. <i>Materials and Methods:</i> This study contained 66 specimens of breast masses that underwent surgical excision and pathological examination of the resected masses; the mean difference between the size taken by US and the size taken by pathology was calculated to the patients as a whole and for each tumor type in this study. <i>Results:</i> The result was that US underestimates the size of the tumor by 0.5 cm for all pathological types, and the US size is in agreement with the pathology size. <i>Conclusions:</i> US is an accurate method in measuring breast lesions with a degree of underestimation that may be related to many factors such as the tumor type, size, and margins. Complementary MRI is recommended in case of ILC and architectural distortion.https://www.mdpi.com/1010-660X/55/11/713breast lesionultrasoundtumor sizingpathology
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Eman Ahmed Shawky Sabek
Hala Taha Salem
spellingShingle Eman Ahmed Shawky Sabek
Hala Taha Salem
Technical Factors Affecting Ultrasound Breast Tumor Size as Correlated with Pathological Type
Medicina
breast lesion
ultrasound
tumor sizing
pathology
author_facet Eman Ahmed Shawky Sabek
Hala Taha Salem
author_sort Eman Ahmed Shawky Sabek
title Technical Factors Affecting Ultrasound Breast Tumor Size as Correlated with Pathological Type
title_short Technical Factors Affecting Ultrasound Breast Tumor Size as Correlated with Pathological Type
title_full Technical Factors Affecting Ultrasound Breast Tumor Size as Correlated with Pathological Type
title_fullStr Technical Factors Affecting Ultrasound Breast Tumor Size as Correlated with Pathological Type
title_full_unstemmed Technical Factors Affecting Ultrasound Breast Tumor Size as Correlated with Pathological Type
title_sort technical factors affecting ultrasound breast tumor size as correlated with pathological type
publisher MDPI AG
series Medicina
issn 1010-660X
publishDate 2019-10-01
description <i>Background and Objectives:</i> Accurate breast tumor sizing is very important in treatment planning; as a result, ultrasound (US) plays an important role in diagnosing breast masses, due to its non-magnified image and its availability. The continuous change in the disease pathogenesis of breast cancer and tremendous advances in US imaging technology require the continuous evaluation of this imaging modality. In this study, our aim was to determine the accuracy of US in measuring the size of breast mass, and if there is an influence of the different pathological types on this accuracy. <i>Materials and Methods:</i> This study contained 66 specimens of breast masses that underwent surgical excision and pathological examination of the resected masses; the mean difference between the size taken by US and the size taken by pathology was calculated to the patients as a whole and for each tumor type in this study. <i>Results:</i> The result was that US underestimates the size of the tumor by 0.5 cm for all pathological types, and the US size is in agreement with the pathology size. <i>Conclusions:</i> US is an accurate method in measuring breast lesions with a degree of underestimation that may be related to many factors such as the tumor type, size, and margins. Complementary MRI is recommended in case of ILC and architectural distortion.
topic breast lesion
ultrasound
tumor sizing
pathology
url https://www.mdpi.com/1010-660X/55/11/713
work_keys_str_mv AT emanahmedshawkysabek technicalfactorsaffectingultrasoundbreasttumorsizeascorrelatedwithpathologicaltype
AT halatahasalem technicalfactorsaffectingultrasoundbreasttumorsizeascorrelatedwithpathologicaltype
_version_ 1724771892503511040