Covid-19 Preparedness and Response Capability: A Case Study of the Hanoi Primary Healthcare System
This study examined the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) preparedness and response of the health system (HS) in Hanoi, Vietnam, and identified enabling factors and barriers. This cross-sectional, mixed-methods study was conducted in 4 urban and peri-urban districts that included some wards with C...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
SAGE Publishing
2021-05-01
|
Series: | Health Services Insights |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1177/11786329211019224 |
id |
doaj-653484c94de74126936677d2724a4e40 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-653484c94de74126936677d2724a4e402021-05-26T21:33:30ZengSAGE PublishingHealth Services Insights1178-63292021-05-011410.1177/11786329211019224Covid-19 Preparedness and Response Capability: A Case Study of the Hanoi Primary Healthcare SystemMinh Van HoangAnh Tuan TranTrang Thu VuTuan Kim DuongThis study examined the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) preparedness and response of the health system (HS) in Hanoi, Vietnam, and identified enabling factors and barriers. This cross-sectional, mixed-methods study was conducted in 4 urban and peri-urban districts that included some wards with COVID-19-positive cases and some without. The US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) analytical frameworks were used. Overall, 10% of health facilities (HFs) failed to fully implement COVID-19 risk determination; 8.8% failed to fully implement stronger community partnerships with local stakeholders to support public health (PH) preparedness; 35% and 2.5% incompletely implemented and did not implement evaluation of PH emergency operations, respectively; 10% did not identify communication channels to issue public information, alerts, warnings, and notifications; 25% incompletely implemented identification, development of guidance, and standards for information; 72.5% had good preventive and treatment collaboration; and 10% did not fully implement procedures for laboratory testing and reporting results. Enablers included sufficient infrastructure and equipment, strong leadership, and good cross-public-sector collaboration with police and military forces. Barriers included workforce constraints, overburdened and inconsistent reporting systems, inappropriate financial mechanisms, ambiguous health governance, and lack of private-sector engagement. Nonetheless, the HS preparedness and response were satisfactory, although further coordinated efforts in evaluation, coordination, communication, and volunteering remain necessary.https://doi.org/10.1177/11786329211019224 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Minh Van Hoang Anh Tuan Tran Trang Thu Vu Tuan Kim Duong |
spellingShingle |
Minh Van Hoang Anh Tuan Tran Trang Thu Vu Tuan Kim Duong Covid-19 Preparedness and Response Capability: A Case Study of the Hanoi Primary Healthcare System Health Services Insights |
author_facet |
Minh Van Hoang Anh Tuan Tran Trang Thu Vu Tuan Kim Duong |
author_sort |
Minh Van Hoang |
title |
Covid-19 Preparedness and Response Capability: A Case Study of the Hanoi Primary Healthcare System |
title_short |
Covid-19 Preparedness and Response Capability: A Case Study of the Hanoi Primary Healthcare System |
title_full |
Covid-19 Preparedness and Response Capability: A Case Study of the Hanoi Primary Healthcare System |
title_fullStr |
Covid-19 Preparedness and Response Capability: A Case Study of the Hanoi Primary Healthcare System |
title_full_unstemmed |
Covid-19 Preparedness and Response Capability: A Case Study of the Hanoi Primary Healthcare System |
title_sort |
covid-19 preparedness and response capability: a case study of the hanoi primary healthcare system |
publisher |
SAGE Publishing |
series |
Health Services Insights |
issn |
1178-6329 |
publishDate |
2021-05-01 |
description |
This study examined the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) preparedness and response of the health system (HS) in Hanoi, Vietnam, and identified enabling factors and barriers. This cross-sectional, mixed-methods study was conducted in 4 urban and peri-urban districts that included some wards with COVID-19-positive cases and some without. The US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) analytical frameworks were used. Overall, 10% of health facilities (HFs) failed to fully implement COVID-19 risk determination; 8.8% failed to fully implement stronger community partnerships with local stakeholders to support public health (PH) preparedness; 35% and 2.5% incompletely implemented and did not implement evaluation of PH emergency operations, respectively; 10% did not identify communication channels to issue public information, alerts, warnings, and notifications; 25% incompletely implemented identification, development of guidance, and standards for information; 72.5% had good preventive and treatment collaboration; and 10% did not fully implement procedures for laboratory testing and reporting results. Enablers included sufficient infrastructure and equipment, strong leadership, and good cross-public-sector collaboration with police and military forces. Barriers included workforce constraints, overburdened and inconsistent reporting systems, inappropriate financial mechanisms, ambiguous health governance, and lack of private-sector engagement. Nonetheless, the HS preparedness and response were satisfactory, although further coordinated efforts in evaluation, coordination, communication, and volunteering remain necessary. |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1177/11786329211019224 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT minhvanhoang covid19preparednessandresponsecapabilityacasestudyofthehanoiprimaryhealthcaresystem AT anhtuantran covid19preparednessandresponsecapabilityacasestudyofthehanoiprimaryhealthcaresystem AT trangthuvu covid19preparednessandresponsecapabilityacasestudyofthehanoiprimaryhealthcaresystem AT tuankimduong covid19preparednessandresponsecapabilityacasestudyofthehanoiprimaryhealthcaresystem |
_version_ |
1721426095022014464 |