Covid-19 Preparedness and Response Capability: A Case Study of the Hanoi Primary Healthcare System

This study examined the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) preparedness and response of the health system (HS) in Hanoi, Vietnam, and identified enabling factors and barriers. This cross-sectional, mixed-methods study was conducted in 4 urban and peri-urban districts that included some wards with C...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Minh Van Hoang, Anh Tuan Tran, Trang Thu Vu, Tuan Kim Duong
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2021-05-01
Series:Health Services Insights
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/11786329211019224
id doaj-653484c94de74126936677d2724a4e40
record_format Article
spelling doaj-653484c94de74126936677d2724a4e402021-05-26T21:33:30ZengSAGE PublishingHealth Services Insights1178-63292021-05-011410.1177/11786329211019224Covid-19 Preparedness and Response Capability: A Case Study of the Hanoi Primary Healthcare SystemMinh Van HoangAnh Tuan TranTrang Thu VuTuan Kim DuongThis study examined the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) preparedness and response of the health system (HS) in Hanoi, Vietnam, and identified enabling factors and barriers. This cross-sectional, mixed-methods study was conducted in 4 urban and peri-urban districts that included some wards with COVID-19-positive cases and some without. The US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) analytical frameworks were used. Overall, 10% of health facilities (HFs) failed to fully implement COVID-19 risk determination; 8.8% failed to fully implement stronger community partnerships with local stakeholders to support public health (PH) preparedness; 35% and 2.5% incompletely implemented and did not implement evaluation of PH emergency operations, respectively; 10% did not identify communication channels to issue public information, alerts, warnings, and notifications; 25% incompletely implemented identification, development of guidance, and standards for information; 72.5% had good preventive and treatment collaboration; and 10% did not fully implement procedures for laboratory testing and reporting results. Enablers included sufficient infrastructure and equipment, strong leadership, and good cross-public-sector collaboration with police and military forces. Barriers included workforce constraints, overburdened and inconsistent reporting systems, inappropriate financial mechanisms, ambiguous health governance, and lack of private-sector engagement. Nonetheless, the HS preparedness and response were satisfactory, although further coordinated efforts in evaluation, coordination, communication, and volunteering remain necessary.https://doi.org/10.1177/11786329211019224
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Minh Van Hoang
Anh Tuan Tran
Trang Thu Vu
Tuan Kim Duong
spellingShingle Minh Van Hoang
Anh Tuan Tran
Trang Thu Vu
Tuan Kim Duong
Covid-19 Preparedness and Response Capability: A Case Study of the Hanoi Primary Healthcare System
Health Services Insights
author_facet Minh Van Hoang
Anh Tuan Tran
Trang Thu Vu
Tuan Kim Duong
author_sort Minh Van Hoang
title Covid-19 Preparedness and Response Capability: A Case Study of the Hanoi Primary Healthcare System
title_short Covid-19 Preparedness and Response Capability: A Case Study of the Hanoi Primary Healthcare System
title_full Covid-19 Preparedness and Response Capability: A Case Study of the Hanoi Primary Healthcare System
title_fullStr Covid-19 Preparedness and Response Capability: A Case Study of the Hanoi Primary Healthcare System
title_full_unstemmed Covid-19 Preparedness and Response Capability: A Case Study of the Hanoi Primary Healthcare System
title_sort covid-19 preparedness and response capability: a case study of the hanoi primary healthcare system
publisher SAGE Publishing
series Health Services Insights
issn 1178-6329
publishDate 2021-05-01
description This study examined the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) preparedness and response of the health system (HS) in Hanoi, Vietnam, and identified enabling factors and barriers. This cross-sectional, mixed-methods study was conducted in 4 urban and peri-urban districts that included some wards with COVID-19-positive cases and some without. The US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) analytical frameworks were used. Overall, 10% of health facilities (HFs) failed to fully implement COVID-19 risk determination; 8.8% failed to fully implement stronger community partnerships with local stakeholders to support public health (PH) preparedness; 35% and 2.5% incompletely implemented and did not implement evaluation of PH emergency operations, respectively; 10% did not identify communication channels to issue public information, alerts, warnings, and notifications; 25% incompletely implemented identification, development of guidance, and standards for information; 72.5% had good preventive and treatment collaboration; and 10% did not fully implement procedures for laboratory testing and reporting results. Enablers included sufficient infrastructure and equipment, strong leadership, and good cross-public-sector collaboration with police and military forces. Barriers included workforce constraints, overburdened and inconsistent reporting systems, inappropriate financial mechanisms, ambiguous health governance, and lack of private-sector engagement. Nonetheless, the HS preparedness and response were satisfactory, although further coordinated efforts in evaluation, coordination, communication, and volunteering remain necessary.
url https://doi.org/10.1177/11786329211019224
work_keys_str_mv AT minhvanhoang covid19preparednessandresponsecapabilityacasestudyofthehanoiprimaryhealthcaresystem
AT anhtuantran covid19preparednessandresponsecapabilityacasestudyofthehanoiprimaryhealthcaresystem
AT trangthuvu covid19preparednessandresponsecapabilityacasestudyofthehanoiprimaryhealthcaresystem
AT tuankimduong covid19preparednessandresponsecapabilityacasestudyofthehanoiprimaryhealthcaresystem
_version_ 1721426095022014464