Effect of Pore Size Heterogeneity on Hydrocarbon Fluid Distribution, Transport, and Primary and Secondary Recovery in Nano-Porous Media

In this paper, we investigate the effect of pore size heterogeneity on fluid composition distribution of multicomponent-multiphase hydrocarbons and its subsequent influence on mass transfer in shale nanopores. The change of multi-contact minimum miscibility pressure (MMP) in heterogeneous nanopores...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kaiyi Zhang, Fengshuang Du, Bahareh Nojabaei
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-04-01
Series:Energies
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/7/1680
id doaj-652e09612b134d0998d526038b5c6c46
record_format Article
spelling doaj-652e09612b134d0998d526038b5c6c462020-11-25T02:21:57ZengMDPI AGEnergies1996-10732020-04-01131680168010.3390/en13071680Effect of Pore Size Heterogeneity on Hydrocarbon Fluid Distribution, Transport, and Primary and Secondary Recovery in Nano-Porous MediaKaiyi Zhang0Fengshuang Du1Bahareh Nojabaei2Mining & Minerals Engineering, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA 24060, USAMining & Minerals Engineering, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA 24060, USAMining & Minerals Engineering, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA 24060, USAIn this paper, we investigate the effect of pore size heterogeneity on fluid composition distribution of multicomponent-multiphase hydrocarbons and its subsequent influence on mass transfer in shale nanopores. The change of multi-contact minimum miscibility pressure (MMP) in heterogeneous nanopores was investigated. We used a compositional simulation model with a modified flash calculation, which considers the effect of large gas–oil capillary pressure on phase behavior. Different average pore sizes for different segments of the computational domain were considered and the effect of the resulting heterogeneity on phase change, composition distributions, and production was investigated. A two-dimensional formulation was considered here for the application of matrix–fracture cross-mass transfer and the rock matrix can also consist of different segments with different average pore sizes. Both convection and molecular diffusion terms were included in the mass balance equations, and different reservoir fluids such as ternary mixture syntactic oil, Bakken oil, and Marcellus shale condensate were considered. The simulation results indicate that oil and gas phase compositions vary in different pore sizes, resulting in a concentration gradient between the two adjacent pores of different sizes. Given that shale permeability is extremely small, we expect the mass transfer between the two sections of the reservoir/core with two distinct average pore sizes to be diffusion-dominated. This observation implies that there can be a selective matrix–fracture component mass transfer as a result of confinement-dependent phase behavior. Therefore, the molecular diffusion term should be always included in the mass transfer equations, for both primary and gas injection enhanced oil recovery (EOR) simulation of heterogeneous shale reservoirs.https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/7/1680pore size heterogeneitymulticomponent-multiphase hydrocarbonsmass transfershaleminimum miscibility pressure (MMP)large oil-gas capillary pressure
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Kaiyi Zhang
Fengshuang Du
Bahareh Nojabaei
spellingShingle Kaiyi Zhang
Fengshuang Du
Bahareh Nojabaei
Effect of Pore Size Heterogeneity on Hydrocarbon Fluid Distribution, Transport, and Primary and Secondary Recovery in Nano-Porous Media
Energies
pore size heterogeneity
multicomponent-multiphase hydrocarbons
mass transfer
shale
minimum miscibility pressure (MMP)
large oil-gas capillary pressure
author_facet Kaiyi Zhang
Fengshuang Du
Bahareh Nojabaei
author_sort Kaiyi Zhang
title Effect of Pore Size Heterogeneity on Hydrocarbon Fluid Distribution, Transport, and Primary and Secondary Recovery in Nano-Porous Media
title_short Effect of Pore Size Heterogeneity on Hydrocarbon Fluid Distribution, Transport, and Primary and Secondary Recovery in Nano-Porous Media
title_full Effect of Pore Size Heterogeneity on Hydrocarbon Fluid Distribution, Transport, and Primary and Secondary Recovery in Nano-Porous Media
title_fullStr Effect of Pore Size Heterogeneity on Hydrocarbon Fluid Distribution, Transport, and Primary and Secondary Recovery in Nano-Porous Media
title_full_unstemmed Effect of Pore Size Heterogeneity on Hydrocarbon Fluid Distribution, Transport, and Primary and Secondary Recovery in Nano-Porous Media
title_sort effect of pore size heterogeneity on hydrocarbon fluid distribution, transport, and primary and secondary recovery in nano-porous media
publisher MDPI AG
series Energies
issn 1996-1073
publishDate 2020-04-01
description In this paper, we investigate the effect of pore size heterogeneity on fluid composition distribution of multicomponent-multiphase hydrocarbons and its subsequent influence on mass transfer in shale nanopores. The change of multi-contact minimum miscibility pressure (MMP) in heterogeneous nanopores was investigated. We used a compositional simulation model with a modified flash calculation, which considers the effect of large gas–oil capillary pressure on phase behavior. Different average pore sizes for different segments of the computational domain were considered and the effect of the resulting heterogeneity on phase change, composition distributions, and production was investigated. A two-dimensional formulation was considered here for the application of matrix–fracture cross-mass transfer and the rock matrix can also consist of different segments with different average pore sizes. Both convection and molecular diffusion terms were included in the mass balance equations, and different reservoir fluids such as ternary mixture syntactic oil, Bakken oil, and Marcellus shale condensate were considered. The simulation results indicate that oil and gas phase compositions vary in different pore sizes, resulting in a concentration gradient between the two adjacent pores of different sizes. Given that shale permeability is extremely small, we expect the mass transfer between the two sections of the reservoir/core with two distinct average pore sizes to be diffusion-dominated. This observation implies that there can be a selective matrix–fracture component mass transfer as a result of confinement-dependent phase behavior. Therefore, the molecular diffusion term should be always included in the mass transfer equations, for both primary and gas injection enhanced oil recovery (EOR) simulation of heterogeneous shale reservoirs.
topic pore size heterogeneity
multicomponent-multiphase hydrocarbons
mass transfer
shale
minimum miscibility pressure (MMP)
large oil-gas capillary pressure
url https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/7/1680
work_keys_str_mv AT kaiyizhang effectofporesizeheterogeneityonhydrocarbonfluiddistributiontransportandprimaryandsecondaryrecoveryinnanoporousmedia
AT fengshuangdu effectofporesizeheterogeneityonhydrocarbonfluiddistributiontransportandprimaryandsecondaryrecoveryinnanoporousmedia
AT baharehnojabaei effectofporesizeheterogeneityonhydrocarbonfluiddistributiontransportandprimaryandsecondaryrecoveryinnanoporousmedia
_version_ 1724864433966022656