Rationale of the Exclusion of Choice of Law by the Parties in Articles 6(4) and 8(3) of Rome II Regulation

Rationale of the Exclusion of Choice of Law by the Parties in Articles 6(4) and 8(3) of Rome II Regulation

This paper analyses the reasons why Rome II restricts party autonomy in Articles 6 and 8.

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Pascal de Vareilles-Sommières
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Scandinavian University Press (Universitetsforlaget) 2019-01-01
Series:Oslo Law Review
Subjects:
Non-contractual obligations
party autonomy
unfair competition
free competition
intellectual property rights
Non-contractualobligations
Online Access:https://www.idunn.no/oslo_law_review/2019/01/rationale_of_the_exclusion_of_choice_of_law_by_the_parties_
id doaj-652cca7c76a94060beba6e5e095c3738
record_format Article
spelling doaj-652cca7c76a94060beba6e5e095c37382020-11-25T03:15:27ZengScandinavian University Press (Universitetsforlaget)Oslo Law Review2387-32992019-01-016626610.18261/issn.2387-3299-2019-01-0818948693Rationale of the Exclusion of Choice of Law by the Parties in Articles 6(4) and 8(3) of Rome II RegulationPascal de Vareilles-SommièresThis paper analyses the reasons why Rome II restricts party autonomy in Articles 6 and 8.https://www.idunn.no/oslo_law_review/2019/01/rationale_of_the_exclusion_of_choice_of_law_by_the_parties_Non-contractual obligationsparty autonomyunfair competitionfree competitionintellectual property rightsNon-contractualobligations
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Pascal de Vareilles-Sommières
spellingShingle Pascal de Vareilles-Sommières
Rationale of the Exclusion of Choice of Law by the Parties in Articles 6(4) and 8(3) of Rome II Regulation
Oslo Law Review
Non-contractual obligations
party autonomy
unfair competition
free competition
intellectual property rights
Non-contractualobligations
author_facet Pascal de Vareilles-Sommières
author_sort Pascal de Vareilles-Sommières
title Rationale of the Exclusion of Choice of Law by the Parties in Articles 6(4) and 8(3) of Rome II Regulation
title_short Rationale of the Exclusion of Choice of Law by the Parties in Articles 6(4) and 8(3) of Rome II Regulation
title_full Rationale of the Exclusion of Choice of Law by the Parties in Articles 6(4) and 8(3) of Rome II Regulation
title_fullStr Rationale of the Exclusion of Choice of Law by the Parties in Articles 6(4) and 8(3) of Rome II Regulation
title_full_unstemmed Rationale of the Exclusion of Choice of Law by the Parties in Articles 6(4) and 8(3) of Rome II Regulation
title_sort rationale of the exclusion of choice of law by the parties in articles 6(4) and 8(3) of rome ii regulation
publisher Scandinavian University Press (Universitetsforlaget)
series Oslo Law Review
issn 2387-3299
publishDate 2019-01-01
description This paper analyses the reasons why Rome II restricts party autonomy in Articles 6 and 8.
topic Non-contractual obligations
party autonomy
unfair competition
free competition
intellectual property rights
Non-contractualobligations
url https://www.idunn.no/oslo_law_review/2019/01/rationale_of_the_exclusion_of_choice_of_law_by_the_parties_
work_keys_str_mv AT pascaldevareillessommieres rationaleoftheexclusionofchoiceoflawbythepartiesinarticles64and83ofromeiiregulation
_version_ 1724639263370248192

Similar Items