Crowd-Sourced Reliability of an Assessment of Lower Facial Aging Using a Validated Visual Scale
Background:. Reliable and valid assessments of the visual endpoints of aesthetic surgery procedures are needed. Currently, most assessments are based on the opinion of patients and their plastic surgeons. The objective of this research was to analyze the reliability of crowdworkers assessing de-iden...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wolters Kluwer
2021-01-01
|
Series: | Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Global Open |
Online Access: | http://journals.lww.com/prsgo/fulltext/10.1097/GOX.0000000000003315 |
id |
doaj-651c28ad88344de08b28245befb29e70 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-651c28ad88344de08b28245befb29e702021-02-26T03:25:48ZengWolters KluwerPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Global Open2169-75742021-01-0191e331510.1097/GOX.0000000000003315202101000-00015Crowd-Sourced Reliability of an Assessment of Lower Facial Aging Using a Validated Visual ScaleJason D. Kelly, PhD0Bryan Comstock, MS1Timothy M. Kowalewski, PhD2James M. Smartt, MD3From the * Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minn.† Department of General Internal Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Wa.From the * Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minn.‡ Bucky Plastic Surgery, Philadelphia, Pa.Background:. Reliable and valid assessments of the visual endpoints of aesthetic surgery procedures are needed. Currently, most assessments are based on the opinion of patients and their plastic surgeons. The objective of this research was to analyze the reliability of crowdworkers assessing de-identified photographs using a validated scale that depicts lower facial aging. Methods:. Twenty photographs of the facial nasolabial region of various non-identifiable faces were obtained for which various degrees of facial aging were present. Independent crowds of 100 crowd workers were tasked with assessing the degree of aging using a photograph numeric scale. Independent groups of crowdworkers were surveyed at 4 different times (weekday daytime, weekday nighttime, weekend daytime, weekend nighttime), once a week for 2 weeks. Results:. Crowds assessing midface region photographs had an overall correlation of R = 0.979 (weekday daytime R = 0.991; weekday nighttime R = 0.985; weekend daytime R = 0.997; weekend nighttime R = 0.985). Bland−Altman test for test-retest agreement showed a normal distribution of assessments over the various times tested, with the differences in the majority of photographs being within 1 SD of the average difference in ratings. Conclusions:. Crowd assessments of facial aging in de-identified photographs displayed very strong concordance with each other, regardless of time of day or week. This shows promise toward obtaining reliable assessments of pre and postoperative results for aesthetic surgery procedures. More work must be done to quantify the reliability of assessments for other pretreatment states or the corresponding results following treatment.http://journals.lww.com/prsgo/fulltext/10.1097/GOX.0000000000003315 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Jason D. Kelly, PhD Bryan Comstock, MS Timothy M. Kowalewski, PhD James M. Smartt, MD |
spellingShingle |
Jason D. Kelly, PhD Bryan Comstock, MS Timothy M. Kowalewski, PhD James M. Smartt, MD Crowd-Sourced Reliability of an Assessment of Lower Facial Aging Using a Validated Visual Scale Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Global Open |
author_facet |
Jason D. Kelly, PhD Bryan Comstock, MS Timothy M. Kowalewski, PhD James M. Smartt, MD |
author_sort |
Jason D. Kelly, PhD |
title |
Crowd-Sourced Reliability of an Assessment of Lower Facial Aging Using a Validated Visual Scale |
title_short |
Crowd-Sourced Reliability of an Assessment of Lower Facial Aging Using a Validated Visual Scale |
title_full |
Crowd-Sourced Reliability of an Assessment of Lower Facial Aging Using a Validated Visual Scale |
title_fullStr |
Crowd-Sourced Reliability of an Assessment of Lower Facial Aging Using a Validated Visual Scale |
title_full_unstemmed |
Crowd-Sourced Reliability of an Assessment of Lower Facial Aging Using a Validated Visual Scale |
title_sort |
crowd-sourced reliability of an assessment of lower facial aging using a validated visual scale |
publisher |
Wolters Kluwer |
series |
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Global Open |
issn |
2169-7574 |
publishDate |
2021-01-01 |
description |
Background:. Reliable and valid assessments of the visual endpoints of aesthetic surgery procedures are needed. Currently, most assessments are based on the opinion of patients and their plastic surgeons. The objective of this research was to analyze the reliability of crowdworkers assessing de-identified photographs using a validated scale that depicts lower facial aging.
Methods:. Twenty photographs of the facial nasolabial region of various non-identifiable faces were obtained for which various degrees of facial aging were present. Independent crowds of 100 crowd workers were tasked with assessing the degree of aging using a photograph numeric scale. Independent groups of crowdworkers were surveyed at 4 different times (weekday daytime, weekday nighttime, weekend daytime, weekend nighttime), once a week for 2 weeks.
Results:. Crowds assessing midface region photographs had an overall correlation of R = 0.979 (weekday daytime R = 0.991; weekday nighttime R = 0.985; weekend daytime R = 0.997; weekend nighttime R = 0.985). Bland−Altman test for test-retest agreement showed a normal distribution of assessments over the various times tested, with the differences in the majority of photographs being within 1 SD of the average difference in ratings.
Conclusions:. Crowd assessments of facial aging in de-identified photographs displayed very strong concordance with each other, regardless of time of day or week. This shows promise toward obtaining reliable assessments of pre and postoperative results for aesthetic surgery procedures. More work must be done to quantify the reliability of assessments for other pretreatment states or the corresponding results following treatment. |
url |
http://journals.lww.com/prsgo/fulltext/10.1097/GOX.0000000000003315 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT jasondkellyphd crowdsourcedreliabilityofanassessmentoflowerfacialagingusingavalidatedvisualscale AT bryancomstockms crowdsourcedreliabilityofanassessmentoflowerfacialagingusingavalidatedvisualscale AT timothymkowalewskiphd crowdsourcedreliabilityofanassessmentoflowerfacialagingusingavalidatedvisualscale AT jamesmsmarttmd crowdsourcedreliabilityofanassessmentoflowerfacialagingusingavalidatedvisualscale |
_version_ |
1724250091829592064 |