Crowd-Sourced Reliability of an Assessment of Lower Facial Aging Using a Validated Visual Scale

Background:. Reliable and valid assessments of the visual endpoints of aesthetic surgery procedures are needed. Currently, most assessments are based on the opinion of patients and their plastic surgeons. The objective of this research was to analyze the reliability of crowdworkers assessing de-iden...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jason D. Kelly, PhD, Bryan Comstock, MS, Timothy M. Kowalewski, PhD, James M. Smartt, MD
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer 2021-01-01
Series:Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Global Open
Online Access:http://journals.lww.com/prsgo/fulltext/10.1097/GOX.0000000000003315
id doaj-651c28ad88344de08b28245befb29e70
record_format Article
spelling doaj-651c28ad88344de08b28245befb29e702021-02-26T03:25:48ZengWolters KluwerPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Global Open2169-75742021-01-0191e331510.1097/GOX.0000000000003315202101000-00015Crowd-Sourced Reliability of an Assessment of Lower Facial Aging Using a Validated Visual ScaleJason D. Kelly, PhD0Bryan Comstock, MS1Timothy M. Kowalewski, PhD2James M. Smartt, MD3From the * Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minn.† Department of General Internal Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Wa.From the * Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minn.‡ Bucky Plastic Surgery, Philadelphia, Pa.Background:. Reliable and valid assessments of the visual endpoints of aesthetic surgery procedures are needed. Currently, most assessments are based on the opinion of patients and their plastic surgeons. The objective of this research was to analyze the reliability of crowdworkers assessing de-identified photographs using a validated scale that depicts lower facial aging. Methods:. Twenty photographs of the facial nasolabial region of various non-identifiable faces were obtained for which various degrees of facial aging were present. Independent crowds of 100 crowd workers were tasked with assessing the degree of aging using a photograph numeric scale. Independent groups of crowdworkers were surveyed at 4 different times (weekday daytime, weekday nighttime, weekend daytime, weekend nighttime), once a week for 2 weeks. Results:. Crowds assessing midface region photographs had an overall correlation of R = 0.979 (weekday daytime R = 0.991; weekday nighttime R = 0.985; weekend daytime R = 0.997; weekend nighttime R = 0.985). Bland−Altman test for test-retest agreement showed a normal distribution of assessments over the various times tested, with the differences in the majority of photographs being within 1 SD of the average difference in ratings. Conclusions:. Crowd assessments of facial aging in de-identified photographs displayed very strong concordance with each other, regardless of time of day or week. This shows promise toward obtaining reliable assessments of pre and postoperative results for aesthetic surgery procedures. More work must be done to quantify the reliability of assessments for other pretreatment states or the corresponding results following treatment.http://journals.lww.com/prsgo/fulltext/10.1097/GOX.0000000000003315
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jason D. Kelly, PhD
Bryan Comstock, MS
Timothy M. Kowalewski, PhD
James M. Smartt, MD
spellingShingle Jason D. Kelly, PhD
Bryan Comstock, MS
Timothy M. Kowalewski, PhD
James M. Smartt, MD
Crowd-Sourced Reliability of an Assessment of Lower Facial Aging Using a Validated Visual Scale
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Global Open
author_facet Jason D. Kelly, PhD
Bryan Comstock, MS
Timothy M. Kowalewski, PhD
James M. Smartt, MD
author_sort Jason D. Kelly, PhD
title Crowd-Sourced Reliability of an Assessment of Lower Facial Aging Using a Validated Visual Scale
title_short Crowd-Sourced Reliability of an Assessment of Lower Facial Aging Using a Validated Visual Scale
title_full Crowd-Sourced Reliability of an Assessment of Lower Facial Aging Using a Validated Visual Scale
title_fullStr Crowd-Sourced Reliability of an Assessment of Lower Facial Aging Using a Validated Visual Scale
title_full_unstemmed Crowd-Sourced Reliability of an Assessment of Lower Facial Aging Using a Validated Visual Scale
title_sort crowd-sourced reliability of an assessment of lower facial aging using a validated visual scale
publisher Wolters Kluwer
series Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Global Open
issn 2169-7574
publishDate 2021-01-01
description Background:. Reliable and valid assessments of the visual endpoints of aesthetic surgery procedures are needed. Currently, most assessments are based on the opinion of patients and their plastic surgeons. The objective of this research was to analyze the reliability of crowdworkers assessing de-identified photographs using a validated scale that depicts lower facial aging. Methods:. Twenty photographs of the facial nasolabial region of various non-identifiable faces were obtained for which various degrees of facial aging were present. Independent crowds of 100 crowd workers were tasked with assessing the degree of aging using a photograph numeric scale. Independent groups of crowdworkers were surveyed at 4 different times (weekday daytime, weekday nighttime, weekend daytime, weekend nighttime), once a week for 2 weeks. Results:. Crowds assessing midface region photographs had an overall correlation of R = 0.979 (weekday daytime R = 0.991; weekday nighttime R = 0.985; weekend daytime R = 0.997; weekend nighttime R = 0.985). Bland−Altman test for test-retest agreement showed a normal distribution of assessments over the various times tested, with the differences in the majority of photographs being within 1 SD of the average difference in ratings. Conclusions:. Crowd assessments of facial aging in de-identified photographs displayed very strong concordance with each other, regardless of time of day or week. This shows promise toward obtaining reliable assessments of pre and postoperative results for aesthetic surgery procedures. More work must be done to quantify the reliability of assessments for other pretreatment states or the corresponding results following treatment.
url http://journals.lww.com/prsgo/fulltext/10.1097/GOX.0000000000003315
work_keys_str_mv AT jasondkellyphd crowdsourcedreliabilityofanassessmentoflowerfacialagingusingavalidatedvisualscale
AT bryancomstockms crowdsourcedreliabilityofanassessmentoflowerfacialagingusingavalidatedvisualscale
AT timothymkowalewskiphd crowdsourcedreliabilityofanassessmentoflowerfacialagingusingavalidatedvisualscale
AT jamesmsmarttmd crowdsourcedreliabilityofanassessmentoflowerfacialagingusingavalidatedvisualscale
_version_ 1724250091829592064