The lack of refugee burden-sharing in Tanzania: tragic effects
The United Republic of Tanzania has been and currently still is one of the most important host countries in the world for refugees. The majority of those refugees have been living in camps for many years and have no prospect of a durable solution of their situation via repatriation, integration or r...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Gents Afrika Platform, Afrika Brug
2009-02-01
|
Series: | Afrika Focus |
Online Access: | https://ojs.ugent.be/AF/article/view/5063 |
id |
doaj-6514a4a0abcd4cab8c970a48f75e7beb |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-6514a4a0abcd4cab8c970a48f75e7beb2020-11-24T23:16:15ZengGents Afrika Platform, Afrika BrugAfrika Focus0772-084X0772-084X2009-02-0122110.21825/af.v22i1.50635063The lack of refugee burden-sharing in Tanzania: tragic effectsMichèle Morel0Department of International Public Law Ghent UniversityThe United Republic of Tanzania has been and currently still is one of the most important host countries in the world for refugees. The majority of those refugees have been living in camps for many years and have no prospect of a durable solution of their situation via repatriation, integration or resettlement. As a result, Tanzania is confronted with protracted refugee situations. The purpose of this article is to answer the question who is responsible for the plight of these refugees. Tanzania’s national refugee policy since the 1960s is analysed, whereby a clear evolution can be observed from an ‘Open Door’ policy to a policy with heavy restrictions and the absence of local integration as a durable solution. However, it will be concluded that it is not Tanzania but the international community that is to be held responsible. There is a lack of international refugee burden-sharing, as evidenced by the lack of an international legal framework for durable solutions for refugees. A ‘common but differentiated responsibility’ should be the basis of international cooperation to solve protracted refugee situations such as those occurring in Tanzania. Key words: African Great Lakes region, protracted refugee situations, national policyhttps://ojs.ugent.be/AF/article/view/5063 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Michèle Morel |
spellingShingle |
Michèle Morel The lack of refugee burden-sharing in Tanzania: tragic effects Afrika Focus |
author_facet |
Michèle Morel |
author_sort |
Michèle Morel |
title |
The lack of refugee burden-sharing in Tanzania: tragic effects |
title_short |
The lack of refugee burden-sharing in Tanzania: tragic effects |
title_full |
The lack of refugee burden-sharing in Tanzania: tragic effects |
title_fullStr |
The lack of refugee burden-sharing in Tanzania: tragic effects |
title_full_unstemmed |
The lack of refugee burden-sharing in Tanzania: tragic effects |
title_sort |
lack of refugee burden-sharing in tanzania: tragic effects |
publisher |
Gents Afrika Platform, Afrika Brug |
series |
Afrika Focus |
issn |
0772-084X 0772-084X |
publishDate |
2009-02-01 |
description |
The United Republic of Tanzania has been and currently still is one of the most important host countries in the world for refugees. The majority of those refugees have been living in camps for many years and have no prospect of a durable solution of their situation via repatriation, integration or resettlement. As a result, Tanzania is confronted with protracted refugee situations. The purpose of this article is to answer the question who is responsible for the plight of these refugees. Tanzania’s national refugee policy since the 1960s is analysed, whereby a clear evolution can be observed from an ‘Open Door’ policy to a policy with heavy restrictions and the absence of local integration as a durable solution. However, it will be concluded that it is not Tanzania but the international community that is to be held responsible. There is a lack of international refugee burden-sharing, as evidenced by the lack of an international legal framework for durable solutions for refugees. A ‘common but differentiated responsibility’ should be the basis of international cooperation to solve protracted refugee situations such as those occurring in Tanzania.
Key words: African Great Lakes region, protracted refugee situations, national policy |
url |
https://ojs.ugent.be/AF/article/view/5063 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT michelemorel thelackofrefugeeburdensharingintanzaniatragiceffects AT michelemorel lackofrefugeeburdensharingintanzaniatragiceffects |
_version_ |
1725588078464073728 |