Supersonic Flow Control Using Combined Energy Deposition

Drag force control via energy deposition in an oncoming flow is a wide area of interest in aerospace sciences. Recently, investigations on the effect of combining energy sources have been conducted. The possibility of coupling microwave (MW) discharges or MW and laser energy deposition is discussed....

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: O. A. Azarova
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2015-03-01
Series:Aerospace
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.mdpi.com/2226-4310/2/1/118
id doaj-650eb28aa03240248f8de02b42303258
record_format Article
spelling doaj-650eb28aa03240248f8de02b423032582020-11-25T01:44:43ZengMDPI AGAerospace2226-43102015-03-012111813410.3390/aerospace2010118aerospace2010118Supersonic Flow Control Using Combined Energy DepositionO. A. Azarova0Department of Mathematical Modeling of Computer-Aided Design Systems, Dorodnicyn Computing Centre of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Vavilova str. 40, Moscow 119333, RussiaDrag force control via energy deposition in an oncoming flow is a wide area of interest in aerospace sciences. Recently, investigations on the effect of combining energy sources have been conducted. The possibility of coupling microwave (MW) discharges or MW and laser energy deposition is discussed. In the present work, the flow details accompanying the interaction of a combined energy release and an aerodynamic body in a supersonic flow are considered numerically on the base of the Euler equations. Comparison with non-combined energy deposition is analyzed. The effect of introducing the internal part to the energy release on the drag force reduction is examined. The flows for blunt cylinder, hemisphere-cylinder and pointed body are considered for a wide class of the combined energy source characteristics. Freestream Mach number is varied from 1.89 to 3.45. Complicated unsteady vortex structures caused by the Richtmyer–Meshkov instabilities are shown to be the reason for the reduction in drag. The unsteady double vortex mechanism of the frontal drag force reduction and mechanism of the constantly acting vortices at the steady flow are described. Suppression of shear layer instability and large scaled flow pulsations as the result of the combined energy release effect is established. Complex conservative difference schemes are used in the simulations.http://www.mdpi.com/2226-4310/2/1/118combined energy depositiondrag force controlcomplex conservative difference schemes
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author O. A. Azarova
spellingShingle O. A. Azarova
Supersonic Flow Control Using Combined Energy Deposition
Aerospace
combined energy deposition
drag force control
complex conservative difference schemes
author_facet O. A. Azarova
author_sort O. A. Azarova
title Supersonic Flow Control Using Combined Energy Deposition
title_short Supersonic Flow Control Using Combined Energy Deposition
title_full Supersonic Flow Control Using Combined Energy Deposition
title_fullStr Supersonic Flow Control Using Combined Energy Deposition
title_full_unstemmed Supersonic Flow Control Using Combined Energy Deposition
title_sort supersonic flow control using combined energy deposition
publisher MDPI AG
series Aerospace
issn 2226-4310
publishDate 2015-03-01
description Drag force control via energy deposition in an oncoming flow is a wide area of interest in aerospace sciences. Recently, investigations on the effect of combining energy sources have been conducted. The possibility of coupling microwave (MW) discharges or MW and laser energy deposition is discussed. In the present work, the flow details accompanying the interaction of a combined energy release and an aerodynamic body in a supersonic flow are considered numerically on the base of the Euler equations. Comparison with non-combined energy deposition is analyzed. The effect of introducing the internal part to the energy release on the drag force reduction is examined. The flows for blunt cylinder, hemisphere-cylinder and pointed body are considered for a wide class of the combined energy source characteristics. Freestream Mach number is varied from 1.89 to 3.45. Complicated unsteady vortex structures caused by the Richtmyer–Meshkov instabilities are shown to be the reason for the reduction in drag. The unsteady double vortex mechanism of the frontal drag force reduction and mechanism of the constantly acting vortices at the steady flow are described. Suppression of shear layer instability and large scaled flow pulsations as the result of the combined energy release effect is established. Complex conservative difference schemes are used in the simulations.
topic combined energy deposition
drag force control
complex conservative difference schemes
url http://www.mdpi.com/2226-4310/2/1/118
work_keys_str_mv AT oaazarova supersonicflowcontrolusingcombinedenergydeposition
_version_ 1725026885257134080