Supersonic Flow Control Using Combined Energy Deposition
Drag force control via energy deposition in an oncoming flow is a wide area of interest in aerospace sciences. Recently, investigations on the effect of combining energy sources have been conducted. The possibility of coupling microwave (MW) discharges or MW and laser energy deposition is discussed....
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2015-03-01
|
Series: | Aerospace |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.mdpi.com/2226-4310/2/1/118 |
id |
doaj-650eb28aa03240248f8de02b42303258 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-650eb28aa03240248f8de02b423032582020-11-25T01:44:43ZengMDPI AGAerospace2226-43102015-03-012111813410.3390/aerospace2010118aerospace2010118Supersonic Flow Control Using Combined Energy DepositionO. A. Azarova0Department of Mathematical Modeling of Computer-Aided Design Systems, Dorodnicyn Computing Centre of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Vavilova str. 40, Moscow 119333, RussiaDrag force control via energy deposition in an oncoming flow is a wide area of interest in aerospace sciences. Recently, investigations on the effect of combining energy sources have been conducted. The possibility of coupling microwave (MW) discharges or MW and laser energy deposition is discussed. In the present work, the flow details accompanying the interaction of a combined energy release and an aerodynamic body in a supersonic flow are considered numerically on the base of the Euler equations. Comparison with non-combined energy deposition is analyzed. The effect of introducing the internal part to the energy release on the drag force reduction is examined. The flows for blunt cylinder, hemisphere-cylinder and pointed body are considered for a wide class of the combined energy source characteristics. Freestream Mach number is varied from 1.89 to 3.45. Complicated unsteady vortex structures caused by the Richtmyer–Meshkov instabilities are shown to be the reason for the reduction in drag. The unsteady double vortex mechanism of the frontal drag force reduction and mechanism of the constantly acting vortices at the steady flow are described. Suppression of shear layer instability and large scaled flow pulsations as the result of the combined energy release effect is established. Complex conservative difference schemes are used in the simulations.http://www.mdpi.com/2226-4310/2/1/118combined energy depositiondrag force controlcomplex conservative difference schemes |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
O. A. Azarova |
spellingShingle |
O. A. Azarova Supersonic Flow Control Using Combined Energy Deposition Aerospace combined energy deposition drag force control complex conservative difference schemes |
author_facet |
O. A. Azarova |
author_sort |
O. A. Azarova |
title |
Supersonic Flow Control Using Combined Energy Deposition |
title_short |
Supersonic Flow Control Using Combined Energy Deposition |
title_full |
Supersonic Flow Control Using Combined Energy Deposition |
title_fullStr |
Supersonic Flow Control Using Combined Energy Deposition |
title_full_unstemmed |
Supersonic Flow Control Using Combined Energy Deposition |
title_sort |
supersonic flow control using combined energy deposition |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
series |
Aerospace |
issn |
2226-4310 |
publishDate |
2015-03-01 |
description |
Drag force control via energy deposition in an oncoming flow is a wide area of interest in aerospace sciences. Recently, investigations on the effect of combining energy sources have been conducted. The possibility of coupling microwave (MW) discharges or MW and laser energy deposition is discussed. In the present work, the flow details accompanying the interaction of a combined energy release and an aerodynamic body in a supersonic flow are considered numerically on the base of the Euler equations. Comparison with non-combined energy deposition is analyzed. The effect of introducing the internal part to the energy release on the drag force reduction is examined. The flows for blunt cylinder, hemisphere-cylinder and pointed body are considered for a wide class of the combined energy source characteristics. Freestream Mach number is varied from 1.89 to 3.45. Complicated unsteady vortex structures caused by the Richtmyer–Meshkov instabilities are shown to be the reason for the reduction in drag. The unsteady double vortex mechanism of the frontal drag force reduction and mechanism of the constantly acting vortices at the steady flow are described. Suppression of shear layer instability and large scaled flow pulsations as the result of the combined energy release effect is established. Complex conservative difference schemes are used in the simulations. |
topic |
combined energy deposition drag force control complex conservative difference schemes |
url |
http://www.mdpi.com/2226-4310/2/1/118 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT oaazarova supersonicflowcontrolusingcombinedenergydeposition |
_version_ |
1725026885257134080 |