Practical Aesthetic Knowledge: Goodman and Husserl on the Possibilities of Learning by Aesthetic Practices

In this article I aim to shed light on the question of whether aesthetic experience can constitute practical knowledge and, if so, how it achieves this. I will compare the approaches of Nelson Goodman and Edmund Husserl. Both authors treat the question of which benefits aesthetic experience can brin...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Iris Laner
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Helsinki University Press 2015-11-01
Series:Estetika
Online Access:https://estetikajournal.org/articles/138
id doaj-650be8ca6c324dbc97180897246cb334
record_format Article
spelling doaj-650be8ca6c324dbc97180897246cb3342020-11-25T02:27:00ZengHelsinki University PressEstetika 2571-09152015-11-0152216418910.33134/eeja.138128Practical Aesthetic Knowledge: Goodman and Husserl on the Possibilities of Learning by Aesthetic PracticesIris Laner0Institute of Philosophy, University of Leuven, Kardinaal Mercierplein 2, 3000 LeuvenIn this article I aim to shed light on the question of whether aesthetic experience can constitute practical knowledge and, if so, how it achieves this. I will compare the approaches of Nelson Goodman and Edmund Husserl. Both authors treat the question of which benefits aesthetic experience can bring to certain basic skills. Though one could argue together with Goodman that repeated aesthetic experience allows for a trained and discriminating approach to artworks, Husserl argues that by viewing aesthetic objects we can learn to perceive in a more undiluted fashion and to qualify our own perceptions against the backdrop of the conceptual framework that shapes our everyday experience. As a consequence, aesthetic experience is not to be regarded as something that only contributes to a normatively loaded involvement in the distinct field of the ‘aesthetic’. Reading Goodman with Husserl and vice versa, I will argue in support of a practical aesthetic knowledge account that mediates cognitivist-constructivist and phenomenological concerns and can thus overcome some of their respective shortcomings. The account I present is useful for understanding the practical value of aesthetic experience in and beyond the confined field of the arts.https://estetikajournal.org/articles/138
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Iris Laner
spellingShingle Iris Laner
Practical Aesthetic Knowledge: Goodman and Husserl on the Possibilities of Learning by Aesthetic Practices
Estetika
author_facet Iris Laner
author_sort Iris Laner
title Practical Aesthetic Knowledge: Goodman and Husserl on the Possibilities of Learning by Aesthetic Practices
title_short Practical Aesthetic Knowledge: Goodman and Husserl on the Possibilities of Learning by Aesthetic Practices
title_full Practical Aesthetic Knowledge: Goodman and Husserl on the Possibilities of Learning by Aesthetic Practices
title_fullStr Practical Aesthetic Knowledge: Goodman and Husserl on the Possibilities of Learning by Aesthetic Practices
title_full_unstemmed Practical Aesthetic Knowledge: Goodman and Husserl on the Possibilities of Learning by Aesthetic Practices
title_sort practical aesthetic knowledge: goodman and husserl on the possibilities of learning by aesthetic practices
publisher Helsinki University Press
series Estetika
issn 2571-0915
publishDate 2015-11-01
description In this article I aim to shed light on the question of whether aesthetic experience can constitute practical knowledge and, if so, how it achieves this. I will compare the approaches of Nelson Goodman and Edmund Husserl. Both authors treat the question of which benefits aesthetic experience can bring to certain basic skills. Though one could argue together with Goodman that repeated aesthetic experience allows for a trained and discriminating approach to artworks, Husserl argues that by viewing aesthetic objects we can learn to perceive in a more undiluted fashion and to qualify our own perceptions against the backdrop of the conceptual framework that shapes our everyday experience. As a consequence, aesthetic experience is not to be regarded as something that only contributes to a normatively loaded involvement in the distinct field of the ‘aesthetic’. Reading Goodman with Husserl and vice versa, I will argue in support of a practical aesthetic knowledge account that mediates cognitivist-constructivist and phenomenological concerns and can thus overcome some of their respective shortcomings. The account I present is useful for understanding the practical value of aesthetic experience in and beyond the confined field of the arts.
url https://estetikajournal.org/articles/138
work_keys_str_mv AT irislaner practicalaestheticknowledgegoodmanandhusserlonthepossibilitiesoflearningbyaestheticpractices
_version_ 1724844678252068864