‘Evidence’ of Neglect as a Form of Structural Violence: Parents with Intellectual Disabilities and Custody Deprivation

This contribution draws upon the findings from a multi-year project in Iceland entitled Family Life and Disability. One goal of the project was to analyse whether or not parents with intellectual disabilities (ID) experienced differential treatment in custody deprivation proceedings. The dataset con...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hanna Björg Sigurjónsdóttir, James G. Rice
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Cogitatio 2018-05-01
Series:Social Inclusion
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.cogitatiopress.com/socialinclusion/article/view/1344
id doaj-64f85eb40f4d4f828288266f197045dd
record_format Article
spelling doaj-64f85eb40f4d4f828288266f197045dd2020-11-24T22:25:29ZengCogitatioSocial Inclusion2183-28032018-05-0162667310.17645/si.v6i2.1344717‘Evidence’ of Neglect as a Form of Structural Violence: Parents with Intellectual Disabilities and Custody DeprivationHanna Björg Sigurjónsdóttir0James G. Rice1Faculty of Social and Human Sciences, University of Iceland, IcelandFaculty of Social and Human Sciences, University of Iceland, IcelandThis contribution draws upon the findings from a multi-year project in Iceland entitled Family Life and Disability. One goal of the project was to analyse whether or not parents with intellectual disabilities (ID) experienced differential treatment in custody deprivation proceedings. The dataset consisted of the analysis of publicly available court documents concerning custody deprivation cases from 2012 to 2017. The project later expanded its dataset to include supplementary information provided by parents. The initial findings mirrored that of the international literature, that parents with ID faced disproportionate levels of permanent custody deprivation and prejudicial attitudes from the child protection system. This contribution critically explores the evidence of parenting neglect that forms of basis for custody deprivation in our dataset. Both authors noted a preponderance of evidence in our dataset that appeared strange and at times absurd, and generally did not appear in cases were ID was not a factor. We contend that this evidence played a prejudicial role in the outcome of these cases. In conclusion we argue that the patterned reliance upon this kind of ‘evidence’ is a form of structural violence which serves to unjustly exclude marginalised groups from the parenting role.https://www.cogitatiopress.com/socialinclusion/article/view/1344child protectioncustody deprivationdisabilityIcelandintellectual disabilitystructural violence
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Hanna Björg Sigurjónsdóttir
James G. Rice
spellingShingle Hanna Björg Sigurjónsdóttir
James G. Rice
‘Evidence’ of Neglect as a Form of Structural Violence: Parents with Intellectual Disabilities and Custody Deprivation
Social Inclusion
child protection
custody deprivation
disability
Iceland
intellectual disability
structural violence
author_facet Hanna Björg Sigurjónsdóttir
James G. Rice
author_sort Hanna Björg Sigurjónsdóttir
title ‘Evidence’ of Neglect as a Form of Structural Violence: Parents with Intellectual Disabilities and Custody Deprivation
title_short ‘Evidence’ of Neglect as a Form of Structural Violence: Parents with Intellectual Disabilities and Custody Deprivation
title_full ‘Evidence’ of Neglect as a Form of Structural Violence: Parents with Intellectual Disabilities and Custody Deprivation
title_fullStr ‘Evidence’ of Neglect as a Form of Structural Violence: Parents with Intellectual Disabilities and Custody Deprivation
title_full_unstemmed ‘Evidence’ of Neglect as a Form of Structural Violence: Parents with Intellectual Disabilities and Custody Deprivation
title_sort ‘evidence’ of neglect as a form of structural violence: parents with intellectual disabilities and custody deprivation
publisher Cogitatio
series Social Inclusion
issn 2183-2803
publishDate 2018-05-01
description This contribution draws upon the findings from a multi-year project in Iceland entitled Family Life and Disability. One goal of the project was to analyse whether or not parents with intellectual disabilities (ID) experienced differential treatment in custody deprivation proceedings. The dataset consisted of the analysis of publicly available court documents concerning custody deprivation cases from 2012 to 2017. The project later expanded its dataset to include supplementary information provided by parents. The initial findings mirrored that of the international literature, that parents with ID faced disproportionate levels of permanent custody deprivation and prejudicial attitudes from the child protection system. This contribution critically explores the evidence of parenting neglect that forms of basis for custody deprivation in our dataset. Both authors noted a preponderance of evidence in our dataset that appeared strange and at times absurd, and generally did not appear in cases were ID was not a factor. We contend that this evidence played a prejudicial role in the outcome of these cases. In conclusion we argue that the patterned reliance upon this kind of ‘evidence’ is a form of structural violence which serves to unjustly exclude marginalised groups from the parenting role.
topic child protection
custody deprivation
disability
Iceland
intellectual disability
structural violence
url https://www.cogitatiopress.com/socialinclusion/article/view/1344
work_keys_str_mv AT hannabjorgsigurjonsdottir evidenceofneglectasaformofstructuralviolenceparentswithintellectualdisabilitiesandcustodydeprivation
AT jamesgrice evidenceofneglectasaformofstructuralviolenceparentswithintellectualdisabilitiesandcustodydeprivation
_version_ 1725757370355679232