Debate: Intravascular ultrasound and optical coherence tomography in percutaneous revascularization. The OCT expert perspective
QUESTION: Do you think there is enough evidence to indicate the use of intravascular imaging during percutaneous coronary interventions? ANSWER: Currently, there is enough evidence on the benefits provided by intracoronary imaging modalities during percutaneous coronary interventions. Actually, the...
Main Author: | Nieves Gonzalo |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Permanyer
2020-11-01
|
Series: | REC: Interventional Cardiology (English Ed.) |
Online Access: | https://recintervcardiol.org/en/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=467 |
Similar Items
-
Debate: Intravascular ultrasound and optical coherence tomography in percutaneous revascularization. The IVUS expert perspective
by: Íñigo Lozano
Published: (2020-11-01) -
Intravascular ultrasound versus optical coherence tomography
by: Rachel Hajar
Published: (2019-01-01) -
Intravascular optical coherence tomography (OCT) as an additional tool for the assessment of stent structures
by: Hoffmann Thomas, et al.
Published: (2015-09-01) -
Utility of optical coherence tomography and intravascular ultrasound for the evaluation of coronary lesions
by: Agustín Girassolli, et al.
Published: (2013-11-01) -
Utility of optical coherence tomography and intravascular ultrasound for the evaluation of coronary lesions
by: Agustín Girassolli, et al.
Published: (2013-11-01)