Interpretazione dialettica e fantasia esatta. Sul sistema in Adorno
Adorno’s negative dialectics wants to free the thought from the dictates of the system, taking position against the illusion to grasp the essence of reality by logic. Against that false idea of totality, Adorno devises a philosophy of fragment, a logic of disgregation that presupposes a different...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Università degli Studi di Milano
2015-12-01
|
Series: | Itinera |
Online Access: | https://riviste.unimi.it/index.php/itinera/article/view/6656 |
id |
doaj-64e52b82e79741378a667d216a7c0d1d |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-64e52b82e79741378a667d216a7c0d1d2020-11-25T03:04:36ZengUniversità degli Studi di MilanoItinera2039-92512015-12-011010.13130/2039-9251/6656Interpretazione dialettica e fantasia esatta. Sul sistema in AdornoGianpaolo Cherchi0Università degli Studi di Sassari Adorno’s negative dialectics wants to free the thought from the dictates of the system, taking position against the illusion to grasp the essence of reality by logic. Against that false idea of totality, Adorno devises a philosophy of fragment, a logic of disgregation that presupposes a different concept of totality: a fragmented, scattered and conflicting wholeness. The anti systematic thinking of Adorno is configured, however, as a systematic rejection of any systematic formulation: philosophy can at most claiming a pretension to truth by the practice of interpretation. A dialectic configuration of fragments of totality is at stake here: so, the arrangement of such fragments can both produce an image of reality endowed with meaning and also unfold through heterogeneous combinations that are not definitive, but always renewable from time to time. In Adorno’s reflection are so expressed two different instances which are complementary at the same time: on the one hand it represents the critical and negative element against the system and its hybris, on the other hand it expresses the need of the thought to go beyond and overcome that fragmentation, showing how the need of unity of the system is a need of the thought in itself. https://riviste.unimi.it/index.php/itinera/article/view/6656 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Gianpaolo Cherchi |
spellingShingle |
Gianpaolo Cherchi Interpretazione dialettica e fantasia esatta. Sul sistema in Adorno Itinera |
author_facet |
Gianpaolo Cherchi |
author_sort |
Gianpaolo Cherchi |
title |
Interpretazione dialettica e fantasia esatta. Sul sistema in Adorno |
title_short |
Interpretazione dialettica e fantasia esatta. Sul sistema in Adorno |
title_full |
Interpretazione dialettica e fantasia esatta. Sul sistema in Adorno |
title_fullStr |
Interpretazione dialettica e fantasia esatta. Sul sistema in Adorno |
title_full_unstemmed |
Interpretazione dialettica e fantasia esatta. Sul sistema in Adorno |
title_sort |
interpretazione dialettica e fantasia esatta. sul sistema in adorno |
publisher |
Università degli Studi di Milano |
series |
Itinera |
issn |
2039-9251 |
publishDate |
2015-12-01 |
description |
Adorno’s negative dialectics wants to free the thought from the dictates of the system, taking position against the illusion to grasp the essence of reality by logic. Against that false idea of totality, Adorno devises a philosophy of fragment, a logic of disgregation that presupposes a different concept of totality: a fragmented, scattered and conflicting wholeness. The anti systematic thinking of Adorno is configured, however, as a systematic rejection of any systematic formulation: philosophy can at most claiming a pretension to truth by the practice of interpretation. A dialectic configuration of fragments of totality is at stake here: so, the arrangement of such fragments can both produce an image of reality endowed with meaning and also unfold through heterogeneous combinations that are not definitive, but always renewable from time to time. In Adorno’s reflection are so expressed two different instances which are complementary at the same time: on the one hand it represents the critical and negative element against the system and its hybris, on the other hand it expresses the need of the thought to go beyond and overcome that fragmentation, showing how the need of unity of the system is a need of the thought in itself.
|
url |
https://riviste.unimi.it/index.php/itinera/article/view/6656 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT gianpaolocherchi interpretazionedialetticaefantasiaesattasulsistemainadorno |
_version_ |
1724680881887510528 |