Interpretazione dialettica e fantasia esatta. Sul sistema in Adorno

Adorno’s negative dialectics wants to free the thought from the dictates of the system, taking position against the illusion to grasp the essence of reality by logic. Against that false idea of totality, Adorno devises a philosophy of  fragment, a logic of disgregation that presupposes a different...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Gianpaolo Cherchi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Università degli Studi di Milano 2015-12-01
Series:Itinera
Online Access:https://riviste.unimi.it/index.php/itinera/article/view/6656
id doaj-64e52b82e79741378a667d216a7c0d1d
record_format Article
spelling doaj-64e52b82e79741378a667d216a7c0d1d2020-11-25T03:04:36ZengUniversità degli Studi di MilanoItinera2039-92512015-12-011010.13130/2039-9251/6656Interpretazione dialettica e fantasia esatta. Sul sistema in AdornoGianpaolo Cherchi0Università degli Studi di Sassari Adorno’s negative dialectics wants to free the thought from the dictates of the system, taking position against the illusion to grasp the essence of reality by logic. Against that false idea of totality, Adorno devises a philosophy of  fragment, a logic of disgregation that presupposes a different concept of totality: a fragmented, scattered and conflicting wholeness. The anti systematic thinking of Adorno is configured, however, as a systematic rejection of any systematic formulation: philosophy can at most claiming a pretension to truth by the practice of interpretation. A dialectic configuration of fragments of totality is at stake here: so, the arrangement of such fragments can both produce an image of reality endowed with meaning and also unfold through heterogeneous combinations that are not definitive, but always renewable from time to time. In Adorno’s reflection are so expressed two different instances which are complementary at the same time: on the one hand it represents the critical and negative element against the system and its hybris, on the other hand it expresses the need of the thought to go beyond and overcome that fragmentation, showing how the need of unity of the system is a need of the thought in itself. https://riviste.unimi.it/index.php/itinera/article/view/6656
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Gianpaolo Cherchi
spellingShingle Gianpaolo Cherchi
Interpretazione dialettica e fantasia esatta. Sul sistema in Adorno
Itinera
author_facet Gianpaolo Cherchi
author_sort Gianpaolo Cherchi
title Interpretazione dialettica e fantasia esatta. Sul sistema in Adorno
title_short Interpretazione dialettica e fantasia esatta. Sul sistema in Adorno
title_full Interpretazione dialettica e fantasia esatta. Sul sistema in Adorno
title_fullStr Interpretazione dialettica e fantasia esatta. Sul sistema in Adorno
title_full_unstemmed Interpretazione dialettica e fantasia esatta. Sul sistema in Adorno
title_sort interpretazione dialettica e fantasia esatta. sul sistema in adorno
publisher Università degli Studi di Milano
series Itinera
issn 2039-9251
publishDate 2015-12-01
description Adorno’s negative dialectics wants to free the thought from the dictates of the system, taking position against the illusion to grasp the essence of reality by logic. Against that false idea of totality, Adorno devises a philosophy of  fragment, a logic of disgregation that presupposes a different concept of totality: a fragmented, scattered and conflicting wholeness. The anti systematic thinking of Adorno is configured, however, as a systematic rejection of any systematic formulation: philosophy can at most claiming a pretension to truth by the practice of interpretation. A dialectic configuration of fragments of totality is at stake here: so, the arrangement of such fragments can both produce an image of reality endowed with meaning and also unfold through heterogeneous combinations that are not definitive, but always renewable from time to time. In Adorno’s reflection are so expressed two different instances which are complementary at the same time: on the one hand it represents the critical and negative element against the system and its hybris, on the other hand it expresses the need of the thought to go beyond and overcome that fragmentation, showing how the need of unity of the system is a need of the thought in itself.
url https://riviste.unimi.it/index.php/itinera/article/view/6656
work_keys_str_mv AT gianpaolocherchi interpretazionedialetticaefantasiaesattasulsistemainadorno
_version_ 1724680881887510528