Dynamical implications of prescribing part of a coupled system: Results from a low-order model

It is a common procedure in climate modelling to specify dynamical system components from an external source; a prominent example is the forcing of an atmospheric model with observed sea surface temperatures. In this paper, we examine the dynamics of such forced models using a simple prototype clima...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: A. T. Wittenberg, J. L. Anderson
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 1998-01-01
Series:Nonlinear Processes in Geophysics
Online Access:http://www.nonlin-processes-geophys.net/5/167/1998/npg-5-167-1998.pdf
id doaj-64dfcace008b4235a94a1736e913f547
record_format Article
spelling doaj-64dfcace008b4235a94a1736e913f5472020-11-25T00:00:33ZengCopernicus PublicationsNonlinear Processes in Geophysics1023-58091607-79461998-01-0153167179Dynamical implications of prescribing part of a coupled system: Results from a low-order modelA. T. WittenbergJ. L. AndersonIt is a common procedure in climate modelling to specify dynamical system components from an external source; a prominent example is the forcing of an atmospheric model with observed sea surface temperatures. In this paper, we examine the dynamics of such forced models using a simple prototype climate system. A particular fully coupled run of the model is designated the "true" solution, and an ensemble of perturbed initial states is generated by adding small errors to the "true" initial state. The perturbed ensemble is then integrated for the same period as the true solution, using both the fully-coupled model and a model in which the ocean is prescribed exactly from the true solution at every time step. Although the prescribed forcing is error-free, the forced-atmosphere ensemble is shown to converge to spurious solutions. Statistical tests show that neither the time-mean state nor the variability of the forced ensemble is consistent with the fully-coupled system. A stability analysis reveals the source of the inconsistency, and suggests that such behaviour may be a more general feature of models with prescribed subsystems. Possible implications for model validation and predictability are discussed.http://www.nonlin-processes-geophys.net/5/167/1998/npg-5-167-1998.pdf
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author A. T. Wittenberg
J. L. Anderson
spellingShingle A. T. Wittenberg
J. L. Anderson
Dynamical implications of prescribing part of a coupled system: Results from a low-order model
Nonlinear Processes in Geophysics
author_facet A. T. Wittenberg
J. L. Anderson
author_sort A. T. Wittenberg
title Dynamical implications of prescribing part of a coupled system: Results from a low-order model
title_short Dynamical implications of prescribing part of a coupled system: Results from a low-order model
title_full Dynamical implications of prescribing part of a coupled system: Results from a low-order model
title_fullStr Dynamical implications of prescribing part of a coupled system: Results from a low-order model
title_full_unstemmed Dynamical implications of prescribing part of a coupled system: Results from a low-order model
title_sort dynamical implications of prescribing part of a coupled system: results from a low-order model
publisher Copernicus Publications
series Nonlinear Processes in Geophysics
issn 1023-5809
1607-7946
publishDate 1998-01-01
description It is a common procedure in climate modelling to specify dynamical system components from an external source; a prominent example is the forcing of an atmospheric model with observed sea surface temperatures. In this paper, we examine the dynamics of such forced models using a simple prototype climate system. A particular fully coupled run of the model is designated the "true" solution, and an ensemble of perturbed initial states is generated by adding small errors to the "true" initial state. The perturbed ensemble is then integrated for the same period as the true solution, using both the fully-coupled model and a model in which the ocean is prescribed exactly from the true solution at every time step. Although the prescribed forcing is error-free, the forced-atmosphere ensemble is shown to converge to spurious solutions. Statistical tests show that neither the time-mean state nor the variability of the forced ensemble is consistent with the fully-coupled system. A stability analysis reveals the source of the inconsistency, and suggests that such behaviour may be a more general feature of models with prescribed subsystems. Possible implications for model validation and predictability are discussed.
url http://www.nonlin-processes-geophys.net/5/167/1998/npg-5-167-1998.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT atwittenberg dynamicalimplicationsofprescribingpartofacoupledsystemresultsfromalowordermodel
AT jlanderson dynamicalimplicationsofprescribingpartofacoupledsystemresultsfromalowordermodel
_version_ 1725444507253604352