Sampling and Fieldwork Practices in Europe: Analysis of Methodological Documentation From 1,537 Surveys in Five Cross-National Projects, 1981-2017
This article addresses the comparability of sampling and fieldwork with an analysis of methodological data describing 1,537 national surveys from five major comparative cross-national survey projects in Europe carried out in the period from 1981 to 2017. We describe the variation in the quality of t...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
PsychOpen
2020-09-01
|
Series: | Methodology |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://meth.psychopen.eu/index.php/meth/article/view/2795 |
id |
doaj-64de7614129845539273f120b49366dc |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-64de7614129845539273f120b49366dc2021-07-13T15:24:47ZengPsychOpenMethodology1614-22412020-09-0116318620710.5964/meth.2795meth.2795Sampling and Fieldwork Practices in Europe: Analysis of Methodological Documentation From 1,537 Surveys in Five Cross-National Projects, 1981-2017Piotr Jabkowski0Marta Kołczyńska1Faculty of Sociology, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznan, PolandDepartment of Socio-Political Systems, Institute of Political Studies of the Polish Academy of Science, Warsaw, PolandThis article addresses the comparability of sampling and fieldwork with an analysis of methodological data describing 1,537 national surveys from five major comparative cross-national survey projects in Europe carried out in the period from 1981 to 2017. We describe the variation in the quality of the survey documentation, and in the survey methodologies themselves, focusing on survey procedures with respect to: 1) sampling frames, 2) types of survey samples and sampling designs, 3) within-household selection of target persons in address-based samples, 4) fieldwork execution and 5) fieldwork outcome rates. Our results show substantial differences in sample designs and fieldwork procedures across survey projects, as well as changes within projects over time. This variation invites caution when selecting data for analysis. We conclude with recommendations regarding the use of information about the survey process to select existing survey data for comparative analyses.https://meth.psychopen.eu/index.php/meth/article/view/2795cross-national comparative surveyssample representativenesssampling and fieldwork proceduressurvey documentation |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Piotr Jabkowski Marta Kołczyńska |
spellingShingle |
Piotr Jabkowski Marta Kołczyńska Sampling and Fieldwork Practices in Europe: Analysis of Methodological Documentation From 1,537 Surveys in Five Cross-National Projects, 1981-2017 Methodology cross-national comparative surveys sample representativeness sampling and fieldwork procedures survey documentation |
author_facet |
Piotr Jabkowski Marta Kołczyńska |
author_sort |
Piotr Jabkowski |
title |
Sampling and Fieldwork Practices in Europe: Analysis of Methodological Documentation From 1,537 Surveys in Five Cross-National Projects, 1981-2017 |
title_short |
Sampling and Fieldwork Practices in Europe: Analysis of Methodological Documentation From 1,537 Surveys in Five Cross-National Projects, 1981-2017 |
title_full |
Sampling and Fieldwork Practices in Europe: Analysis of Methodological Documentation From 1,537 Surveys in Five Cross-National Projects, 1981-2017 |
title_fullStr |
Sampling and Fieldwork Practices in Europe: Analysis of Methodological Documentation From 1,537 Surveys in Five Cross-National Projects, 1981-2017 |
title_full_unstemmed |
Sampling and Fieldwork Practices in Europe: Analysis of Methodological Documentation From 1,537 Surveys in Five Cross-National Projects, 1981-2017 |
title_sort |
sampling and fieldwork practices in europe: analysis of methodological documentation from 1,537 surveys in five cross-national projects, 1981-2017 |
publisher |
PsychOpen |
series |
Methodology |
issn |
1614-2241 |
publishDate |
2020-09-01 |
description |
This article addresses the comparability of sampling and fieldwork with an analysis of methodological data describing 1,537 national surveys from five major comparative cross-national survey projects in Europe carried out in the period from 1981 to 2017. We describe the variation in the quality of the survey documentation, and in the survey methodologies themselves, focusing on survey procedures with respect to: 1) sampling frames, 2) types of survey samples and sampling designs, 3) within-household selection of target persons in address-based samples, 4) fieldwork execution and 5) fieldwork outcome rates. Our results show substantial differences in sample designs and fieldwork procedures across survey projects, as well as changes within projects over time. This variation invites caution when selecting data for analysis. We conclude with recommendations regarding the use of information about the survey process to select existing survey data for comparative analyses. |
topic |
cross-national comparative surveys sample representativeness sampling and fieldwork procedures survey documentation |
url |
https://meth.psychopen.eu/index.php/meth/article/view/2795 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT piotrjabkowski samplingandfieldworkpracticesineuropeanalysisofmethodologicaldocumentationfrom1537surveysinfivecrossnationalprojects19812017 AT martakołczynska samplingandfieldworkpracticesineuropeanalysisofmethodologicaldocumentationfrom1537surveysinfivecrossnationalprojects19812017 |
_version_ |
1721305163903270912 |