Sampling and Fieldwork Practices in Europe: Analysis of Methodological Documentation From 1,537 Surveys in Five Cross-National Projects, 1981-2017

This article addresses the comparability of sampling and fieldwork with an analysis of methodological data describing 1,537 national surveys from five major comparative cross-national survey projects in Europe carried out in the period from 1981 to 2017. We describe the variation in the quality of t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Piotr Jabkowski, Marta Kołczyńska
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: PsychOpen 2020-09-01
Series:Methodology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://meth.psychopen.eu/index.php/meth/article/view/2795
id doaj-64de7614129845539273f120b49366dc
record_format Article
spelling doaj-64de7614129845539273f120b49366dc2021-07-13T15:24:47ZengPsychOpenMethodology1614-22412020-09-0116318620710.5964/meth.2795meth.2795Sampling and Fieldwork Practices in Europe: Analysis of Methodological Documentation From 1,537 Surveys in Five Cross-National Projects, 1981-2017Piotr Jabkowski0Marta Kołczyńska1Faculty of Sociology, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznan, PolandDepartment of Socio-Political Systems, Institute of Political Studies of the Polish Academy of Science, Warsaw, PolandThis article addresses the comparability of sampling and fieldwork with an analysis of methodological data describing 1,537 national surveys from five major comparative cross-national survey projects in Europe carried out in the period from 1981 to 2017. We describe the variation in the quality of the survey documentation, and in the survey methodologies themselves, focusing on survey procedures with respect to: 1) sampling frames, 2) types of survey samples and sampling designs, 3) within-household selection of target persons in address-based samples, 4) fieldwork execution and 5) fieldwork outcome rates. Our results show substantial differences in sample designs and fieldwork procedures across survey projects, as well as changes within projects over time. This variation invites caution when selecting data for analysis. We conclude with recommendations regarding the use of information about the survey process to select existing survey data for comparative analyses.https://meth.psychopen.eu/index.php/meth/article/view/2795cross-national comparative surveyssample representativenesssampling and fieldwork proceduressurvey documentation
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Piotr Jabkowski
Marta Kołczyńska
spellingShingle Piotr Jabkowski
Marta Kołczyńska
Sampling and Fieldwork Practices in Europe: Analysis of Methodological Documentation From 1,537 Surveys in Five Cross-National Projects, 1981-2017
Methodology
cross-national comparative surveys
sample representativeness
sampling and fieldwork procedures
survey documentation
author_facet Piotr Jabkowski
Marta Kołczyńska
author_sort Piotr Jabkowski
title Sampling and Fieldwork Practices in Europe: Analysis of Methodological Documentation From 1,537 Surveys in Five Cross-National Projects, 1981-2017
title_short Sampling and Fieldwork Practices in Europe: Analysis of Methodological Documentation From 1,537 Surveys in Five Cross-National Projects, 1981-2017
title_full Sampling and Fieldwork Practices in Europe: Analysis of Methodological Documentation From 1,537 Surveys in Five Cross-National Projects, 1981-2017
title_fullStr Sampling and Fieldwork Practices in Europe: Analysis of Methodological Documentation From 1,537 Surveys in Five Cross-National Projects, 1981-2017
title_full_unstemmed Sampling and Fieldwork Practices in Europe: Analysis of Methodological Documentation From 1,537 Surveys in Five Cross-National Projects, 1981-2017
title_sort sampling and fieldwork practices in europe: analysis of methodological documentation from 1,537 surveys in five cross-national projects, 1981-2017
publisher PsychOpen
series Methodology
issn 1614-2241
publishDate 2020-09-01
description This article addresses the comparability of sampling and fieldwork with an analysis of methodological data describing 1,537 national surveys from five major comparative cross-national survey projects in Europe carried out in the period from 1981 to 2017. We describe the variation in the quality of the survey documentation, and in the survey methodologies themselves, focusing on survey procedures with respect to: 1) sampling frames, 2) types of survey samples and sampling designs, 3) within-household selection of target persons in address-based samples, 4) fieldwork execution and 5) fieldwork outcome rates. Our results show substantial differences in sample designs and fieldwork procedures across survey projects, as well as changes within projects over time. This variation invites caution when selecting data for analysis. We conclude with recommendations regarding the use of information about the survey process to select existing survey data for comparative analyses.
topic cross-national comparative surveys
sample representativeness
sampling and fieldwork procedures
survey documentation
url https://meth.psychopen.eu/index.php/meth/article/view/2795
work_keys_str_mv AT piotrjabkowski samplingandfieldworkpracticesineuropeanalysisofmethodologicaldocumentationfrom1537surveysinfivecrossnationalprojects19812017
AT martakołczynska samplingandfieldworkpracticesineuropeanalysisofmethodologicaldocumentationfrom1537surveysinfivecrossnationalprojects19812017
_version_ 1721305163903270912