Job Desirability

By 2016, U.S. higher education institutions will face significant turnover among senior leaders. About 50% of university presidents are expected to retire. Historically, the chief academic officer (CAO) has been next in line for the presidency. New evidence suggests that fewer CAOs are interested in...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Radecka Appiah-Padi PhD
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2014-09-01
Series:SAGE Open
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244014551711
id doaj-64dd31b09daa46f99d8e0eb2cab0169f
record_format Article
spelling doaj-64dd31b09daa46f99d8e0eb2cab0169f2020-11-25T03:32:22ZengSAGE PublishingSAGE Open2158-24402014-09-01410.1177/215824401455171110.1177_2158244014551711Job DesirabilityRadecka Appiah-Padi PhD0The Pennsylvania State University, Williamsport, USABy 2016, U.S. higher education institutions will face significant turnover among senior leaders. About 50% of university presidents are expected to retire. Historically, the chief academic officer (CAO) has been next in line for the presidency. New evidence suggests that fewer CAOs are interested in this position. Using Job Choice Theory, this article examines the reasons given by CAOs for opting out of pursuing the presidency. Data analysis shows that subjective (psycho-social) factors rather than objective (economic) factors are making the role of president undesirable to CAOs.https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244014551711
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Radecka Appiah-Padi PhD
spellingShingle Radecka Appiah-Padi PhD
Job Desirability
SAGE Open
author_facet Radecka Appiah-Padi PhD
author_sort Radecka Appiah-Padi PhD
title Job Desirability
title_short Job Desirability
title_full Job Desirability
title_fullStr Job Desirability
title_full_unstemmed Job Desirability
title_sort job desirability
publisher SAGE Publishing
series SAGE Open
issn 2158-2440
publishDate 2014-09-01
description By 2016, U.S. higher education institutions will face significant turnover among senior leaders. About 50% of university presidents are expected to retire. Historically, the chief academic officer (CAO) has been next in line for the presidency. New evidence suggests that fewer CAOs are interested in this position. Using Job Choice Theory, this article examines the reasons given by CAOs for opting out of pursuing the presidency. Data analysis shows that subjective (psycho-social) factors rather than objective (economic) factors are making the role of president undesirable to CAOs.
url https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244014551711
work_keys_str_mv AT radeckaappiahpadiphd jobdesirability
_version_ 1724568786983452672