Basal cell hyperplasia (BCH) versus high grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (HGPIN) in tiny prostatic needle biopsies: Unusual diagnostic dilemma

Background: Histopathological differentiation between BCH and HGPIN in prostatic needle biopsies is a diagnostic challenge. The gold standard for detection of HGPIN and BCH is histopathological examination; however subjectivity in interpretation and tiny volume of obtained tissue hamper reliable dia...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Fatma El-Zahraa Salah El-Deen Yassin, Eman M.S. Muhammad, Mohammed Zaki, Mohammed Dyaa Saleem, Rabab Ahmed Ahmed Mohammed
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SpringerOpen 2014-03-01
Series:Journal of the Egyptian National Cancer Institute
Subjects:
p63
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1110036213000915
id doaj-64d5ef0f4a60453e81ad329136013650
record_format Article
spelling doaj-64d5ef0f4a60453e81ad3291360136502020-11-25T01:46:19ZengSpringerOpenJournal of the Egyptian National Cancer Institute1110-03622014-03-01261152210.1016/j.jnci.2013.08.004Basal cell hyperplasia (BCH) versus high grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (HGPIN) in tiny prostatic needle biopsies: Unusual diagnostic dilemmaFatma El-Zahraa Salah El-Deen Yassin0Eman M.S. Muhammad1Mohammed Zaki2Mohammed Dyaa Saleem3Rabab Ahmed Ahmed Mohammed4Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Sohag University, Sohag, EgyptDepartment of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Sohag University, Sohag, EgyptDepartment of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Sohag University, Sohag, EgyptDepartment of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Sohag University, Sohag, EgyptDepartment of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Assiut University, Assiut, EgyptBackground: Histopathological differentiation between BCH and HGPIN in prostatic needle biopsies is a diagnostic challenge. The gold standard for detection of HGPIN and BCH is histopathological examination; however subjectivity in interpretation and tiny volume of obtained tissue hamper reliable diagnosis. Aims: The aim of this study was to assess usefulness of using the p63 and p504s to solve this problem. Although the use of p63 and p504s is now well established in differentiation between preneoplastic and neoplastic prostatic lesions, their usefulness in tiny tissue material is, however, not fully studied. Methods: The study included a spectrum of 30 prostatic needle biopsies (5 BCH, 10 HGPIN, 10 indefinite luminal proliferations where BCH and HGPIN could not be distinguished from each other and 5 adenocarcinomas). H&E stained sections were examined for histopathological features. Other sections were stained immunohistochemically with p63 and p504s. Results: The mean age of patients was 69 (SD = 7.6) years. PSA range was 1.3–2.7 ng/ml. Ultrasongraphic findings were unremarkable. All BCH showed p504s−/p63+ pattern, All HGPIN had p504s+/p63+ pattern while carcinomas were p504s+/p63−. After immunostaining combined with histopathological features; the 10 indefinite specimens could be diagnosed as 4 BCH and 6 HGPIN. The article explains how applying this staining pattern on the challenging specimens, combined with histopathological features, can be helpful in proper identification of prostatic proliferations.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1110036213000915Prostatic carcinomaBasal cell hyperplasiaProstatic intraepithelial neoplasiap63P504s
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Fatma El-Zahraa Salah El-Deen Yassin
Eman M.S. Muhammad
Mohammed Zaki
Mohammed Dyaa Saleem
Rabab Ahmed Ahmed Mohammed
spellingShingle Fatma El-Zahraa Salah El-Deen Yassin
Eman M.S. Muhammad
Mohammed Zaki
Mohammed Dyaa Saleem
Rabab Ahmed Ahmed Mohammed
Basal cell hyperplasia (BCH) versus high grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (HGPIN) in tiny prostatic needle biopsies: Unusual diagnostic dilemma
Journal of the Egyptian National Cancer Institute
Prostatic carcinoma
Basal cell hyperplasia
Prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia
p63
P504s
author_facet Fatma El-Zahraa Salah El-Deen Yassin
Eman M.S. Muhammad
Mohammed Zaki
Mohammed Dyaa Saleem
Rabab Ahmed Ahmed Mohammed
author_sort Fatma El-Zahraa Salah El-Deen Yassin
title Basal cell hyperplasia (BCH) versus high grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (HGPIN) in tiny prostatic needle biopsies: Unusual diagnostic dilemma
title_short Basal cell hyperplasia (BCH) versus high grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (HGPIN) in tiny prostatic needle biopsies: Unusual diagnostic dilemma
title_full Basal cell hyperplasia (BCH) versus high grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (HGPIN) in tiny prostatic needle biopsies: Unusual diagnostic dilemma
title_fullStr Basal cell hyperplasia (BCH) versus high grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (HGPIN) in tiny prostatic needle biopsies: Unusual diagnostic dilemma
title_full_unstemmed Basal cell hyperplasia (BCH) versus high grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (HGPIN) in tiny prostatic needle biopsies: Unusual diagnostic dilemma
title_sort basal cell hyperplasia (bch) versus high grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (hgpin) in tiny prostatic needle biopsies: unusual diagnostic dilemma
publisher SpringerOpen
series Journal of the Egyptian National Cancer Institute
issn 1110-0362
publishDate 2014-03-01
description Background: Histopathological differentiation between BCH and HGPIN in prostatic needle biopsies is a diagnostic challenge. The gold standard for detection of HGPIN and BCH is histopathological examination; however subjectivity in interpretation and tiny volume of obtained tissue hamper reliable diagnosis. Aims: The aim of this study was to assess usefulness of using the p63 and p504s to solve this problem. Although the use of p63 and p504s is now well established in differentiation between preneoplastic and neoplastic prostatic lesions, their usefulness in tiny tissue material is, however, not fully studied. Methods: The study included a spectrum of 30 prostatic needle biopsies (5 BCH, 10 HGPIN, 10 indefinite luminal proliferations where BCH and HGPIN could not be distinguished from each other and 5 adenocarcinomas). H&E stained sections were examined for histopathological features. Other sections were stained immunohistochemically with p63 and p504s. Results: The mean age of patients was 69 (SD = 7.6) years. PSA range was 1.3–2.7 ng/ml. Ultrasongraphic findings were unremarkable. All BCH showed p504s−/p63+ pattern, All HGPIN had p504s+/p63+ pattern while carcinomas were p504s+/p63−. After immunostaining combined with histopathological features; the 10 indefinite specimens could be diagnosed as 4 BCH and 6 HGPIN. The article explains how applying this staining pattern on the challenging specimens, combined with histopathological features, can be helpful in proper identification of prostatic proliferations.
topic Prostatic carcinoma
Basal cell hyperplasia
Prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia
p63
P504s
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1110036213000915
work_keys_str_mv AT fatmaelzahraasalaheldeenyassin basalcellhyperplasiabchversushighgradeprostaticintraepithelialneoplasiahgpinintinyprostaticneedlebiopsiesunusualdiagnosticdilemma
AT emanmsmuhammad basalcellhyperplasiabchversushighgradeprostaticintraepithelialneoplasiahgpinintinyprostaticneedlebiopsiesunusualdiagnosticdilemma
AT mohammedzaki basalcellhyperplasiabchversushighgradeprostaticintraepithelialneoplasiahgpinintinyprostaticneedlebiopsiesunusualdiagnosticdilemma
AT mohammeddyaasaleem basalcellhyperplasiabchversushighgradeprostaticintraepithelialneoplasiahgpinintinyprostaticneedlebiopsiesunusualdiagnosticdilemma
AT rababahmedahmedmohammed basalcellhyperplasiabchversushighgradeprostaticintraepithelialneoplasiahgpinintinyprostaticneedlebiopsiesunusualdiagnosticdilemma
_version_ 1725020312393744384