Two Questions on the Ontology of Money
This dialogue reflects and synthesized the content of a recent publication (Einaudi, 2018) entitled Il denaro e i suoi inganni (by John R. Searle and Maurizio Ferraris, ed. by Angela Condello). The two philosophers present their perspectives on the ontology of money, which are different and yet inte...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Rosenberg & Sellier
2018-09-01
|
Series: | Ardeth |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://journals.openedition.org/ardeth/676 |
id |
doaj-64c7bfb16a4348df9b0b961f72c74f59 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-64c7bfb16a4348df9b0b961f72c74f592021-07-08T16:42:03ZengRosenberg & SellierArdeth2532-64572611-934X2018-09-013180191Two Questions on the Ontology of MoneyAngela CondelloThis dialogue reflects and synthesized the content of a recent publication (Einaudi, 2018) entitled Il denaro e i suoi inganni (by John R. Searle and Maurizio Ferraris, ed. by Angela Condello). The two philosophers present their perspectives on the ontology of money, which are different and yet interestingly intertwined. On the one hand, Searle returns on the crucial function of intentionality in the construction of social reality: it is intentionality that gives value to banknotes. On the other hand, Ferraris responds with his theory of documentality, that today – with bitcoins and blockchains – must be defined as “documediality”. Money emerges as the paradigmatic social object, which we should observe as a meaningful symbol of contemporary societies.http://journals.openedition.org/ardeth/676moneysocial ontologydocumentalityintentionality |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Angela Condello |
spellingShingle |
Angela Condello Two Questions on the Ontology of Money Ardeth money social ontology documentality intentionality |
author_facet |
Angela Condello |
author_sort |
Angela Condello |
title |
Two Questions on the Ontology of Money |
title_short |
Two Questions on the Ontology of Money |
title_full |
Two Questions on the Ontology of Money |
title_fullStr |
Two Questions on the Ontology of Money |
title_full_unstemmed |
Two Questions on the Ontology of Money |
title_sort |
two questions on the ontology of money |
publisher |
Rosenberg & Sellier |
series |
Ardeth |
issn |
2532-6457 2611-934X |
publishDate |
2018-09-01 |
description |
This dialogue reflects and synthesized the content of a recent publication (Einaudi, 2018) entitled Il denaro e i suoi inganni (by John R. Searle and Maurizio Ferraris, ed. by Angela Condello). The two philosophers present their perspectives on the ontology of money, which are different and yet interestingly intertwined. On the one hand, Searle returns on the crucial function of intentionality in the construction of social reality: it is intentionality that gives value to banknotes. On the other hand, Ferraris responds with his theory of documentality, that today – with bitcoins and blockchains – must be defined as “documediality”. Money emerges as the paradigmatic social object, which we should observe as a meaningful symbol of contemporary societies. |
topic |
money social ontology documentality intentionality |
url |
http://journals.openedition.org/ardeth/676 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT angelacondello twoquestionsontheontologyofmoney |
_version_ |
1721312883356205056 |