Proximal tibial replacement in revision knee arthroplasty for non-oncologic indications

Proximal tibial metaphyseal bone loss compromises the alignment and fixation of components during revision total knee arthroplasty. In massive, segmental defects with loss of collateral ligamentous support and lack of bone to support the use of prosthetic augments or metaphyseal cones or sleeves, a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Brianna Fram, MD, Eric B. Smith, MD, Gregory K. Deirmengian, MD, John A. Abraham, MD, John Strony, BS, Michael B. Cross, MD, Danielle Y. Ponzio, MD
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2020-03-01
Series:Arthroplasty Today
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S235234411930158X
id doaj-64b6d275dc85488e9f392f171d96799c
record_format Article
spelling doaj-64b6d275dc85488e9f392f171d96799c2020-11-25T02:19:41ZengElsevierArthroplasty Today2352-34412020-03-01612335Proximal tibial replacement in revision knee arthroplasty for non-oncologic indicationsBrianna Fram, MD0Eric B. Smith, MD1Gregory K. Deirmengian, MD2John A. Abraham, MD3John Strony, BS4Michael B. Cross, MD5Danielle Y. Ponzio, MD6Rothman Institute, Philadelphia, PA, USARothman Institute, Philadelphia, PA, USARothman Institute, Philadelphia, PA, USARothman Institute, Philadelphia, PA, USARothman Institute, Philadelphia, PA, USAHospital For Special Surgery, New York, NY, USARothman Institute, Philadelphia, PA, USA; Corresponding author. Rothman Institute, 2500 English Creek Avenue, Building 1300, Egg Harbor, Township, NJ 08234, USA. Tel.: +1 856 371 2453.Proximal tibial metaphyseal bone loss compromises the alignment and fixation of components during revision total knee arthroplasty. In massive, segmental defects with loss of collateral ligamentous support and lack of bone to support the use of prosthetic augments or metaphyseal cones or sleeves, a hinged proximal tibial replacement or a so-called “megaprosthesis” should be available. While proximal tibial replacement is the reconstructive method of choice in the setting of bone tumor resection, applications in non-oncologic joint arthroplasty are rare and may offer an opportunity for limb salvage in dire clinical scenarios with massive proximal tibial bone loss. This report reviews 6 cases of proximal tibial replacement. Keywords: Proximal tibial replacement, Megaprosthesis, Revision knee arthroplasty, Bone losshttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S235234411930158X
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Brianna Fram, MD
Eric B. Smith, MD
Gregory K. Deirmengian, MD
John A. Abraham, MD
John Strony, BS
Michael B. Cross, MD
Danielle Y. Ponzio, MD
spellingShingle Brianna Fram, MD
Eric B. Smith, MD
Gregory K. Deirmengian, MD
John A. Abraham, MD
John Strony, BS
Michael B. Cross, MD
Danielle Y. Ponzio, MD
Proximal tibial replacement in revision knee arthroplasty for non-oncologic indications
Arthroplasty Today
author_facet Brianna Fram, MD
Eric B. Smith, MD
Gregory K. Deirmengian, MD
John A. Abraham, MD
John Strony, BS
Michael B. Cross, MD
Danielle Y. Ponzio, MD
author_sort Brianna Fram, MD
title Proximal tibial replacement in revision knee arthroplasty for non-oncologic indications
title_short Proximal tibial replacement in revision knee arthroplasty for non-oncologic indications
title_full Proximal tibial replacement in revision knee arthroplasty for non-oncologic indications
title_fullStr Proximal tibial replacement in revision knee arthroplasty for non-oncologic indications
title_full_unstemmed Proximal tibial replacement in revision knee arthroplasty for non-oncologic indications
title_sort proximal tibial replacement in revision knee arthroplasty for non-oncologic indications
publisher Elsevier
series Arthroplasty Today
issn 2352-3441
publishDate 2020-03-01
description Proximal tibial metaphyseal bone loss compromises the alignment and fixation of components during revision total knee arthroplasty. In massive, segmental defects with loss of collateral ligamentous support and lack of bone to support the use of prosthetic augments or metaphyseal cones or sleeves, a hinged proximal tibial replacement or a so-called “megaprosthesis” should be available. While proximal tibial replacement is the reconstructive method of choice in the setting of bone tumor resection, applications in non-oncologic joint arthroplasty are rare and may offer an opportunity for limb salvage in dire clinical scenarios with massive proximal tibial bone loss. This report reviews 6 cases of proximal tibial replacement. Keywords: Proximal tibial replacement, Megaprosthesis, Revision knee arthroplasty, Bone loss
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S235234411930158X
work_keys_str_mv AT briannaframmd proximaltibialreplacementinrevisionkneearthroplastyfornononcologicindications
AT ericbsmithmd proximaltibialreplacementinrevisionkneearthroplastyfornononcologicindications
AT gregorykdeirmengianmd proximaltibialreplacementinrevisionkneearthroplastyfornononcologicindications
AT johnaabrahammd proximaltibialreplacementinrevisionkneearthroplastyfornononcologicindications
AT johnstronybs proximaltibialreplacementinrevisionkneearthroplastyfornononcologicindications
AT michaelbcrossmd proximaltibialreplacementinrevisionkneearthroplastyfornononcologicindications
AT danielleyponziomd proximaltibialreplacementinrevisionkneearthroplastyfornononcologicindications
_version_ 1724875012721082368